Archive for the ‘World War III’ Category

Download & Forward PDF

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor, officially applied for political asylum in Switzerland on July 17, 2015, the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called “natural disasters” I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, the Swiss CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in Switzerland, know this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland was harboring the CIA; and b) the CIA has historically not shat where it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland.

WORLD WAR III: CIA Plotting Proxy War Between US & Russia in Syria to Spark World War III—Russian-Based Nuclear Missile Strike on US and/or Russian-Based Attack/Invasion of Alaska, Syria and/or Ukraine Imminent

RED DAWN SCENARIO: CIA Plotting Chinese Pearl Harbor-Like Surprise Attack—Cloaked Chinese Drone Attack, US Drone Cyber-Hijack Attack & Sub-Based Nuclear Strike on US Top Terror Scenarios

NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST: CIA Plotting Iranian Nuclear Terror Attack on America—LA, NYC, DC & NFL Cities Most Likely to Suffer Attack

ISIS ENDGAME:
How & Why the CIA Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks

BOOM: CIA Plotting Man-Made Asteroid Strike this October—JADE HELM States, Gulf of Mexico & Pacific Rim of Fire Most Likely to Suffer Attack

BREAKING NEWS: CERN Is Secret Entrance to Subterranean CIA Headquarters Located Beneath Lake Geneva in Switzerland

RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA

David Chase Taylor
October 15, 2015
Truther.org

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Ever since Truther.org revealed that the CIA in Switzerland created ISIS as political cover for nuclear and biological terror attacks, CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva has been grooming Russia for a confrontation with the U.S. that will predictably lead to World War III.

In short, the 700-year cover of the CIA in Switzerland was officially blown for the first time in history by whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor in his shocking new book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) and therefore the Swiss CIA is beyond desperate to start World War III.

It is imperative to note that NATO, Russia, the United States and its two respective puppets named Putin and Obama are under the command and control of the CIA in Switzerland, all of which are indirectly funded by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland.

Exactly what type of Russian terror is planned is not known, but a Russian-based cyber terror-attack and/or nuclear missile strike on America, and/or the Russian-based attack/invasion of Alaska, Iraq, Poland, Syria, Sweden, Turkey, and/or Ukraine may be imminent.

That being said, it now appears that the CIA will stage ISIS-related attacks in Russia, most likely bio-chemical in nature. Since ISIS is openly being funded by the Obama administration, ISIS-related attacks in Russia will be blamed on the U.S, drawing America into World War III with Russia.

In order to provide a timely motive for ISIS-related attacks in Russia, it was reported back on October 2, 2015, that Russia launched 18 attacks in Syria within a 24-hour period, destroying an alleged ISIS command center, training camp and bomb factory.

In what appears to be pre-Russian terror attack programming, it was reported October 5, 2015, that a huge explosion occurred near the Russian embassy in Kabul. The bomb was designed to foreshadow the notion that ISIS-related terrorists are now targeting Russia..

A day later on October 6, 2015, it was reported that some 3,000 terrorists have left Syria following the Russian airstrikes. The report was designed to sell the notion that ISIS-inspired terrorists are now leaving Syria for safer locations such as Russia.

In order to sell the notion that ISIS-inspired terrorists will return to Russia in order to commit terror attacks, Russia Today published a report on October 8, 2015, entitled “ISIS Training Militants from Russia In Afghanistan, ‘US and UK Citizens Among Instructors’”.

In what appears to be a preview of ISIS-related terror to come, it was reported on October 11, 2015, that Russian anti-terror forces thwarted a terror attack in Moscow. The alleged thwarting of the attack was in all likelihood the terror drill for the impending ISIS attack.

A day later on October 12, 2015, it was reported that ISIS-trained terrorists planned an attack on Moscow public transport. Consequently, a bio-terror attack to spark the 2015 bio-terror pandemic now appears to be planned for Russia.

A day later on October 13, 2015, it was reported that so-called insurgents shelled the Russian embassy in Syria. The bombing was designed to foreshadow the notion that ISIS-related terrorists are now targeting Russian entities.

Lastly, in order to provide a timely motive for ISIS-related terror attacks in Russia, it was reported on October 14, 2015, that Russia is “deliberately targeting” U.S.-backed forces in Syria. Considering that U.S.-backed forces is code-word for ISIS, when Russia is attacked by ISIS World War III with the U.S. will likely ensue.

TOP RUSSIAN ATTACK SCENARIOS:

1. ISIS-Inspired Terror Attacks in Russia
2. Russian WMD Missile Strike on America
3. Russian-Based Cyber-Terror Attack
4.
Russian Attack on U.S. Ships in Mediterranean
5. Russian Attack/Invasion of Alaska
6. Russian Attack/Invasion of Iraq
7. Russian Attack/Invasion of Poland
8.
Russian Attack/Invasion of Sweden
9. Russian Attack/Invasion of Syria
10.
Russian Attack/Invasion of Ukraine

Putin Russia

Russian Attack Trending
In order to provide a timely motive for a Russian-based attack on the United States, it was reported back on August 11, 2015, that the hit TV terror show “Homeland” will take on Russian President Vladimir Putin in season 5. Three days later on August 14, 2015, it was reported that a classified Pentagon exercises revealed that the U.S. would struggle to win a war with Russia. The timely report of the once classified exercise was designed to foreshadow the notion that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent. Then notion that a deadly conflict between the U.S. and Russia is imminent was confirmed on September 19, 2015, when Russia Today published a report entitled “Pentagon Updates Plans for War with ‘Potentially Aggressive’ Russia”. In what appears to be a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to highlight Russia on an international level just prior to an unprecedented attack, it was reported on September 22, 2015, that former U.S. military General David Petraeus accused Putin of trying to re-establish Russian Empire. A day later on September 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Kremlin Promises ‘Counter-Steps’ in Reply to US Deploying Nuclear Weapons to Germany”. Needless to say, the escalation of U.S. weapons in Europe has provided a timely motive for a Russian-based attack on the U.S. or her troops in Syria. Roughly a week later on October 1, 2015, it was reported that Russia is “pouring gasoline on the fire” in Syria as airstrikes hit CIA-backed rebels, providing a timely motive for a revenge attack by the United States that will most likely be blamed on Russia. That same day, October 1, 2015, U.S. Senator John McCain stated that the Syrian Rebels should shoot down Russian planes in Syria, raising the notion of incoming Russian aircraft just prior to the aerial invasion of Iraq by Russia. In order to sell the notion that Russia is planning the full-scale invasion just prior to its fruition in reality, it was reported on October 1, 2015, that Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree drafting 150,000 conscripts into the Russian military. Lastly, four days later on October 5, 2015, it was reported that Turkish jets intercepted a Russian plane. The incident was likely staged by the CIA in order to foreshadow the notion of a Russian aerial invasion which will most likely take place in Alaska, Iraq, Poland, Syria or Ukraine.

Latest Russian War Games
Back on September 20, 2015, it was reported that Russia’s biggest-ever military drill entitled “Center-2015” is ending its final stage. Whether the final stage involves a direct attack on America or a proxy attack on U.S. troops (i.e., ISIS) in Iraq or Syria is not known, but it’s highly likely. Russia’s Center-2015, which began on September 14, 2015, targeted “terrorists” and involved 95,000 Russian servicemen, over 7,000 military hardware and vehicles, 170 military aircraft, and 20 warships. Consequently, it’s possible that the CIA will use Russian troops to exterminate the U.S.-lead ISIS. Four days later on September 24, 2015, Russia announced naval drills in the “east Mediterranean” that will take place this September and October. The drills will reportedly involve “40 combat exercises, including rocket and artillery fire at sea and airborne targets”. Needless to say, the drills will go live at some point. The Russian drills will reportedly include three warships from Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, including the Saratov landing ship, the Moskva guided missile cruiser and the Russian Destroyer Smetlivy. Consequently, it’s highly likely that one or more of these ships will be involved in a naval confrontation with U.S. or NATO allies in the region.

I. WORLD WAR III FLASHPOINTS:

1.1: Global Flashpoints
Whenever blood must be spilled by the CIA, disputed areas like Crimea (Eastern Europe), Jerusalem (Middle East), Kashmir (Central Asia) or the Senkaku Islands (Asia) are suddenly inflamed by the CIA through the television channels which they control outright. Consequently, politicians, soldiers and militaries equipment are moved like pawns in the global scheme run by the Swiss CIA. In respect to the impending World War III scenario between the U.S. and Russia, Truther.org has identified 5 flashpoints which are blinking red in respect to a Russian-based attack, invasion or terror attacks.

1.2: Russian Attack on Turkey
Based on breaking news and events, it now appears that CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva is planning to stage the Russian attack/invasion of Turkey. The notion that Russia is planning to go into Turkey was first identified back on October 5, 2015, when a Turkish jet intercepted a Russian plane. That same day, October 5, 2015, Russia reportedly stated that the Turkish airspace violation “a mistake”, one which they will likely make again. In what appears to be pre-Russian attack on Turkey programming, the Guardian published a report on October 8, 2015, entitled “NATO Ready to ‘Defend’ Turkey as Russia Strikes Syria”, foreshadowing that a Russian attack on Tukey is imminent. Two days later on October 10, 2015, it was reported that a Russian jet was shot down by Turkey after it flew into Turkish airspace. The incident was evidently designed to provide a timely motive for a Russian revenge attack on Turkey just prior to its fruition in reality.

1.3: Russian Attack on Iraq
Based on breaking news and events, it now appears that CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva is planning to stage the Russian invasion of Iraq. Since ISIS is defined as the “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria”, the logical step after attacking Syria is for Russia to finish the job in Iraq. The notion that Russia will invade Iraq was first identified back on September 26, 2015, when it was reported that Russia, Iran, Iraq and Syria are setting up a “joint information center” to coordinate anti-ISIS operations. Translation: Russia is setting up logistics to take over Iraq and Syria. The notion that Russia is not done invading the Middle East was highlighted in a CNN report from September 27, 2015, entitled “Russia’s Syria Expedition: Why Now and What’s Next?”. Evidently, what’s next for Russia is the full-scale invasion of Iraq. This notion was confirmed in an October 5, 2015, report entitled “Preview Of World War III? Russia Is Putting On A Display Of Firepower That Is Shocking The World”, which quoted Russian political commentator Yulia Latynina who stated that Russia wants to see the destruction of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). A day after launching a campaign of airstrikes in Syria, Russia announced that it is now considering going into Iraq. A foreign ministry representative from Russia stated that they would consider any request from Iraq to conduct anti-ISIS airstrikes in the country. Iraqi President Haider al-Abadi reportedly told Western news outlets that Russian airstrikes were “a possibility” and that Iraq would “welcome it”. In the event that Russia invades Iraq, U.S. forces will respond with violence, leading to World War III between the U.S. and Russia. A day later on October 6, 2015, it was reported that Russia is ready to consider the Iraqi request for airstrikes. Less than 24-hours later on October 7, 2015, Reuters published a report entitled “Iraq Leans Toward Russia in War on Islamic State”, suggesting that Russian military activity in Iraq is now imminent. That same day, October 7, 2015, it was reported that an Iraqi official may soon request Russian air strikes on ISIS. Also on October 7, 2015, the Iraq defense committee chairman reportedly stated that “We are seeking bigger role for Russia than Americans’, suggesting that Russian involvement in Iraq is imminent Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that the Russian attack/invasion of Iraq is imminent.

ISIS Russia Putin III

1.4: Russian Attack on Syria
Based on breaking news and events, it appears that CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva is plotting a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia in Syria. Said proxy war is designed to spark a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia which will lead to World War III. This particular narrative was first identified back on September 8, 2015, when the New York Times published a report entitled “U.S. Moves to Block Russian Military Buildup in Syria”, confirming that Russia is essentially invading Syria. Two days later on September 10, 2015, the U.S. reportedly warned Russia on its military buildup in Syria, giving Russia an ultimatum in respect to Syria. That same day, September 10, 2015, it was reported that Russian troops have joined the fight in Syria to “prop up” Assad. In other words, Russia is now publically backing Assad in Syria and therefore is diametrically opposed to the Syrian Rebels which are being funded by Obama to oust Assad. Four days later on September 14, 2015, it was reported that Russia is shipping tanks into Syria, the “first clear sign of offensive weapons” in Syria. Translation: a Russian offensive involving tanks in Syria appears imminent. That same day, September 14, 2015, the Pentagon reportedly stated that Russia is establishing a new military air base in Syria. Consequently, a full-scale aerial-based confrontation between the U.S. and Syria appears imminent. Lastly, in what appears to be the military drill for the Russian invasion of Syria, it was reported on September 14, 2015, that 95,000 Russian troops are now engaged in massive military drill entitled Centre-2015. Said military drill will likely go live in just a matter of time. A day later on September 15, 2015, the BBC published a report entitled “Syria Conflict: Russia ‘to Continue Assad Military Aid’”, further confirming the notion that a proxy war between the Obama-funded Syrian Rebels and the Putin-funded Assad is brewing. A day later on September 16, 2015, CNN published a report entitled “U.S. Looks on Warily as Russian Helicopters Arrive in Syria”, further confirming Russia’s military buildup in Syria. Roughly 24-hours later on September 17, 2015, the BBC published a report entitled “What is Russia’s Role in Syria?”, drawing international media publicity to Russia motives just prior to the start of a proxy war in Syria. A day later on September 18, 2015, Foreign Policy published a report entitled “The Pentagon Is Preparing New War Plans for a Baltic Battle Against Russia”, confirming that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent, although a conflict in Syria is far more likely than in the Baltics. Also on September 18, 2015, Fox News reported that US-Russia military talks will begin amid Russia’s military buildup in Syria, drawing international attention to the escalating conflict. Also on September 18, 2015, it was reported that Russia has moved its first tactical fighter jets to a military base in Syria, further confirming Russia’s military buildup in Syria. That same day, traitorous Infowars published a report on September 18, 2015, entitled “Putin Sends Tanks to Syria: Largest Deployment of Outside Russian Forces Since USSR Collapse”, essentially confirming that Russia has invaded Syria. Also on September 18, 2015, it was reported that the Syrian Army is starting to use new weapons provided to them by Russia, confirming that a proxy war in Syria has already begun. Three days later on September 21, 2015, Russia reportedly began flying unmanned drones over Syria, and is sending more fighter jets to the region. A day later on September 22, 2015, the Wall Street Journal published a report entitled “Russia Expands Military Presence in Syria, Satellite Photos Show”, further corroborating the notion that Russia military involvement in Syria is escalating prior to the impending proxy war. Lastly, a day later on September 23, 2015, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry warned that the U.S. and Russia may clash in Syria, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that the CIA is indeed plotting a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia in Syria. Said proxy war will no doubt lead to a nuclear World War III. Four days later on September 27, 2015, Putin stated that the U.S. proxy war in Syria violates international law, confirming that a proxy was in Syria is already in progress. Three days later on September 30, 2015, the Russian parliament unanimously approved the use of military forces to fight ISIS in Syria. Translation: Russia is planning a lengthy incursion of Syria. Two days later on October 2, 2015, it was reported that Russia launched 18 attacks in Syria which reportedly destroyed an ISIS command center, bomb factory and training camp. Five days later on October 7, 2015, it was reported that Russia and the U.S. are working on an agreement to coordinate air operations in Syria. Needless to say, the agreement is being drafted specifically so that it can be breached at a later date. That same day, October 7, 2015, it was reported that Russian jets intercepted a U.S. predator drones over Syria, an apparent preview of the U.S. vs. Russia confrontation to come. A week later on October 14, 2015, a similar incident occurred when Russia stated that its jet neared a U.S. aircraft over Syria, further foreshadowing an impending conflict between the U.S. and Russia in Syria. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based attack/invasion of Syria is imminent.

Putin Crimea

1.5: Russian Attack on Ukraine
Considering that Ukraine, a NATO nation, was already invaded by Russia during the crisis in Crimea, it’s the most likely country in Europe to suffer a Russian attack and secondary invasion. Based on recent news in respect to both Ukraine and nuclear warfare, a nuclear strike in Ukraine now appears to be in order. This particular narrative was first identified back on March 15, 2015, when Putin stated that Russia was preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary” while simultaneously blaming the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Ukraine. Roughly a month later on April 28, 2015, it was reported that forest fires were heading for Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine. Roughly a month later on June 5, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Kiev to Allow Foreign Armed Forces in Ukraine, incl. ‘Potential Carriers of Nukes’”. These 4 reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based nuclear strike on Ukraine is imminent. The nuclear attack will likely happen just prior to, during, or right after the U.S. led NATO invasion of Ukraine. In order to foreshadow further Russian aggression in Ukraine, CNN published a report on June 11, 2015, entitled “U.S. Ambassador to U.N. Visits Ukraine, Slams Russian ‘Aggression’”. Four days later on June 15, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, starting that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. In a clear sign that war in Ukraine is imminent, it was reported on June 18, 2015, that Iraq War criminal Tony Blair will take on an advisory role in Ukraine. Three days later on June 21, 2015, Ukraine’s Right Sector rejects the Minsk deal, calling for a renewed offensive in Ukraine. The notion that war is about to break out in Ukraine was confirmed on June 22, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S. will provide weapons for NATO commandos to attack Ukrainian separatists. That same day, June 22, 2015, it was also reported that a member of Kiev’s top brass ‘defects’ to anti-government forces. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the traitorous general will lead the opposition to Russia in the coming war. A day later on June 23, 2015, the Guardian published a report entitled “EU Extends Sanctions against Russia as Ukraine Conflict Rumbles On”. Although the conflict in Ukraine has been dormant for months, it apparently going to get a shot in the arm. Lastly, in what appears to be pre-nuclear terror programming for Ukraine, it was reported on August 6, 2015, that ISIS uranium smugglers were busted in special op in western Ukraine. In what appears to be pre-Russian attack on Ukraine programing, it was reported on August 22, 2015, that Ukrainian leader Poroshenko stated that the Minsk agreement allows for a Kiev military buildup. In other words, the CIA is plotting a new war between Ukraine and Russia, hence the military buildup. In what appears to be an ominous sign of Ukrainian terror to come, it was reported on August 31, 2015, that 1 person was killed and 100 injured in political clashes in Ukraine. The state-sponsored riots are a red flag that war in Ukraine is imminent. Lastly, on September 14, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “U.S.-Installed Ukrainian Regime Now Fears Return of Donbass to Ukraine”, further foreshadowing a proxy war between NATO-led U.S. and Russia in Ukraine. Roughly 10-days later on September 25, 2015, it was reported that Ukraine’s president signed a new military doctrine which named Russia as the biggest threat. The timely report was designed to provide a timely motive for a Russian-based revenge attack. Four days later on September 29, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon’s top official on Russia and Ukraine was resigning. The resignation was likely due to a Russian-Syria proxy war terror plot which was foiled four days prior on September 25, 2015. Lastly, in order to provide a timely motive for a Russian-based attack on Ukraine, it was reported on October 12, 2015, that Ukraine has closed its skies to Russian aircraft. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based attack/invasion of Ukraine is imminent.

US Russia World War III

1.6: Russian Attack on Alaska
Although a Russian-based attack could theoretically transpire anywhere along its vast borders (e.g., Poland, Sweden, Ukraine, etc.), breaking news suggest that the U.S. state of Alaska will suffer a Russian attack and subsequent invasion. Considering Alaska was purchased from Russia for only $7.2 million in 1867, an invasion to take it back is all but expected. The notion that the U.S. in concerned about the potential Russian invasion of Alaska was recently rehashed on September 1, 2014, by Telegraph report entitled “America’s Secret Plan to Stop Russian Invasion of Alaska Revealed” which highlighted the Operation Washtub. According to reports, Operation Washtub was a U.S. military program designed to recruit Alaskan fishermen, trappers and bush pilots as “stay-behind agents” to form a secret American resistance network if and when Russia staged a widely-feared invasion of the state. The notion that Russia is targeting Alaska was first identified on May 1, 2015, when it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska. The incident conforms, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing an attack on Alaska. Shortly thereafter in June of 2015, the U.S. war game exercise entitled Northern Edge 2015 was executed in Alaska. The drills reportedly involved more than 200 aircraft and 6,000 U.S. soldiers from all four branches of the military. The unprecedented drill appears to be the U.S. military’s planned response to the impending Russian invasion. In order to sell the notion that a Russian invasion is imminent, Russian bombers executed a flyby of Alaska on July 4, 2015. Considering that the incident was not reported until 3-weeks later, it can be deduced that the incident was fabricated by the CIA in order to foreshadow a Russia attack on Alaska. The notion that Russia is about to stage an invasion of the artic was foreshadowed in an August 8, 2015, report from Fox News entitled “Republicans Slam Obama Administration as Russia Tries Arctic Land Grab”. Considering that Alaska is in the artic, an invasion by Russia may be forthcoming. In order to foreshadow that native Alaskans will suddenly become Russia citizens, it was also reported on August 11, 2015, that visa-free travel to Russia will be reinstated for eligible Alaska Natives. The shocking development was designed to show that diplomatic relations with Russia are about to change in a major way. A day later on August 12, 2015, it was reported that Japanese paratroopers took part in landmark jump over Alaska. Needless to say, the timely report was designed to foreshadow an invasion of Alaska, most likely by Russian paratroopers. In what appears to be an ominous sign that a Russian invasion of the U.S. is imminent, it was reported on August 13, 2015, that Russia has moved a huge number of troops to its western border. The alleged move by Russia is an apparent fake to invade Europe while they secretly plot to invade Alaska. A day later on August 14, 2015, it was reported that a classified Pentagon exercises revealed that the U.S. would struggle to win a war with Russia. The timely report of the once classified exercise was designed to foreshadow the notion that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent. That same day, August 14, 2015, it was also reported that the American F-35 fighter is “inferior” to Russia’s Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter aircraft. Again, the timely report was designed to show that the U.S. is inferior to Russia just prior to the surprise attack and/or invasion of Alaska. A day later on August 15, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Radical Christians Raid Soviet Art Show in Moscow”. The timely report was designed to foreshadow a Russian “raid” just prior to the full-scale invasion of Alaska by Russia. In what appears to be pre-Russian attack politics, it was reported on August 16, 2015, that Russia is now squeezing critics at home by declaring them “foreign agents”. In other words, Putin is now cracking down on dissent just prior to an unprovoked attack on America, namely Alaska. In order to put Alaska in the international spotlight just prior to Russian invasion, it was reported on August 18, 2015, that the U.S. will now let Shell drill for oil off the coast of Alaska. Considering that Shell has been drilling in Alaska for years, it can be deduced that the report is a fabricated propaganda report. That same day, August 18, 2015, it was reported that an Alaska Village is now seeking to be reunited with their Russian relatives. Again, the timely report was designed to foreshadow that Alaska will be reunited with Russia post-Russian invasion. Lastly, on August 19, 2015, it was reported that 3 men are missing and presumed dead after several landslides in Alaska. The landslides were man-made in nature in order to put Alaska in the national media spotlight just prior to an attack.

1.7: Russian Attack on Poland
The notion that NATO and Russia are about to go to war was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO. Three days later on June 10, 2015, NATO started “very high readiness” war games in Poland, providing a timely motive for a Russian-based attack. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. The CIA-spawned hoax was a publicity stunt designed to provide another timely motive for a Russian-based attack on NATO. Three days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now win talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe, posing a direct threat to Russia. The notion of Russian tanks rolling into Poland was ominously foreshadowed on June 14, 2015, when the Sunday Times published a report entitled “German Tanks Roll Back into Poland”. Similar to the invasion of Crimea, the impending invasion of Poland will be used to sell the notion of a new Cold War between Russia and the West. In order to provide another blatant motive for a Russian attack on Poland, it was reported on June 14, 2015, that Poland has erected observation towers on its border with Russia. The red-and-white metal radio-tower-like structures are reportedly equipped with cameras, rising up to 164 feet. A day later on June 15, 2015, it was confirmed that the U.S. will store heavy weapons in Poland under NATO’s new plan, proving yet another motive for a Russian-based attack on Poland, Islamic terrorist or otherwise. Lastly, the notion that Russia is planning a retaliatory attack on NATO was all but confirmed on June 16, 2015, when it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep in Poland. Consequently, an Islamic and/or Russian based attack is expected.

1.8: Russian Attack on Sweden
Aside from being an active participant in numerous NATO war games, Sweden borders Russia to the West and therefore is the most likely of the Western European countries to suffer a direct attack or invasion by Russia. Although a nuclear strike on Sweden is highly unlikely, a bio-terror attack is a far more realistic possibility, possibly sparking the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. The notion of a Sweden-based bio-terror attack was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when it was reported that migrant beggars in Sweden were attacked with acid. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO.

II. RUSSIAN ATTACK:

Russia Putin

2.1: Russian Missile Strike
Since the CIA has thus far been unable to execute a Russian-based attack on the United States, they may resort to staging Russian-based WMD missile strikes on America. Said attack will most likely originate from a submarine within the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean. In what appears to be pre-Russian missile strike programing, it was reported back on June 16, 2015, that Russian President Putin stated that Russia will create 40 new intercontinental missiles this year, all of which are nuclear in nature. Roughly 2-months later on August 11, 2015, it was reported that the White House blocked a Pentagon report on a missile treaty that was breached by Russia. Considering that Russia allegedly violated the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, nuclear missile strikes by Russia may now be forthcoming. In order to highlight Russia and nuclear missiles just prior to a staged nuclear attack, it was reported on August 19, 2015, that the Russia has moved ahead with a missile sale to Iran. That same day, August 19, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force has test-launched an unarmed missile from California. The so-called missile test appears to be a beta-test for a Russian-based nuclear strike on California, most likely targeting Los Angeles and/or San Francisco. Lastly, that same day, August 19, 2015, it was also reported that the U.S. military has launched a second airship near Baltimore to test America’s missile defense system. Again, the missile defense test appears to be a beta-test for a Russian-based nuclear strike on east coast of America, most likely targeting New York City and/or Washington, D.C.

Putin Nuke Nuclear

2.2: Russian Nuclear Terror Attack
Exactly one month before the aforementioned book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) was published on December 21, 2014, Forbes published a report on November 21, 2014, entitled “Does Russia Think Their New Nuclear Weapons Could Win A War?”. This was the first-ever report identified by Truther.org which foreshadowed an unprecedented and unprovoked nuclear strike by Russia. Ever since revelations where made public that Switzerland harbors the CIA, the international media (which operates at the behest of the CIA) has been inundated with the Russian nuclear attack narrative. For example, it was reported back on March 15, 2015, that Vladimir Putin stated that Russia is preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary”. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin again threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Crimea in Ukraine. It is imperative to note that the latter two reports invoking Ukraine and a nuclear attack are key because aside from the United States, Ukraine is most likely NATO country to suffer a Russian nuclear strike. Roughly a month later on May 1, 2015, it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska, conforming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing a nuclear strike. Roughly 4-weeks later on May 27, 2015, a NATO general warned that Russian President Putin is a “dangerous gambler…willing to use nuclear weapons”, an apparent preview of things to come. The notion of a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia was foreshadowed in a Russia Today report from June 7, 2015, entitled “UK Could Host US Nukes to Counter Increased ‘Russian Activity’”, as well as a Telegraph report entitled “Nuclear Missiles Could be Sited Again on British Soil in New ‘Cold War’ with Russia”. In what appears to be an ominous sign of things to come, the Daily Star published a report on June 8, 2015, entitled “Armageddon Strikes: Massive Cloud Sparks Russian Nuclear Attack Panic”. A day later on June 9, 2015, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt was enacted by intelligence operative Mark Dice who created a petition to nuke Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “US and Russia ‘Playing Nuclear Chicken with Each Other’”, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that nuclear war between the two nations is imminent. A day later on June 12, 2015, it was reported that people in Moscow widely oppose the fake petition to nuke America, further raising the specter of nuclear war between the two countries. Five days later on June 17, 2015, Kremlin officials stated that Russia’s nuclear buildup is being forced by the West. Three days later on June 20, 2015, Putin stated that the world was no closer to Cold War-style nuclear standoff, raising the notion of a nuclear confrontation just prior to its fruition in reality. Three days later on June 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “The Pentagon Goes Nuclear on Russia” which stated that Russian submarines off the coast of America could engage in a “nuclear turkey shoot”, knocking out every major American city within a few minutes. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles which travel through space. Lastly, on June 25, 2015, Reuters published a report entitled “Russia ‘Playing with Fire’ with Nuclear Saber-Rattling”, further inferring that a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia is now in play by the CIA.

2.3: Russian Bio-Terror Attack
Although a Russian-based nuclear attack are the most likely scenario, there is also the chance that the Swiss CIA could spark a biological pandemic in Europe during the impending conflict between the U.S. and Russia. How this bio-terror pandemic will manifest is not yet known, but it has been foreshadowed in the news nonetheless. For example, on June 5, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Expert Predicts Anthrax Attacks Will Be Used to Push Russian War”, consummating the terms Anthrax and Russia within the same headlines. Ten days later on June 15, 2015, Infowars published another report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, stating that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. Needless to say, one of these bio-labs in Eastern Europe could be directly attacked or suffer collateral damage, leading to a biological outbreak that could spark the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015.

2.4: Russian Cyber-Attack
In the aftermath of unprecedented cyber-related terror attacks on the travel industry, the Swiss CIA will may finger Russia. In order to create the narrative in the media that Russia is actively targeting America with cyber-related attacks, it was reported back on April 8, 2015, that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network, a fraudulent notion to be sure. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks, an apparent preview of things to come. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. Lastly, less than 2-weeks later on June 9, 2015, TV5 Monde was reportedly attacked ‘by Russia-based hackers’, setting the precedent the impending attack. Lastly, on September 16, 2015, it was reported that a Russian national plead guilty in a major corporate hack attack case, further selling the notion that Russia is targeting the west with cyber-attacks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that Russia will be scapegoated in the aftermath of an unprecedented cyber-terror attack targeting American and/or European airliners, likely leading to a new Cold War.

III. ALL THE WORLD IS A STAGE:

BIS (2)

3.1: US & Russia Funded by BIS in Switzerland
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland is the financial backbone of the CIA in Switzerland which secretly funds its black operations around the world. In short, the BIS funds 60 central banks which are collectively responsible for 95% of the world’s GDP, making it the sole progenitor of the world’s fiat money supply. These central banks include the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States which funds the U.S. government and her military, and the Bank of Russia which funds the Russian government and her military. Consequently, all monies allocated to the U.S. and Russia for World War III originated from the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland which, aside from Vatican City, is the only country to bear a sovereign flag. Consequently, the United States and Russia do not have sovereign flags, meaning that they are not in control of their own destiny nor their own respective militaries.

PutinObama2013G20Summit640

3.2: Presidential Puppets Obama & Putin
Since both U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin are puppets of the CIA, they have no real power and only act when told to do so. In other words, neither of them is actually in charge; they are just political puppets posing for the cameras. However, in order to create the public perception that the beef between the U.S. and Russia is real, Obama reportedly urged G7 leaders to maintain the sanctions on Russia while simultaneously admitting that they don’t work. A day later on June 6, 2015, Putin reportedly stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. The premediated soundbite was given in order to create the perception that Putin is crazy, especially in the aftermath of unprovoked nuclear strikes against the U.S. and NATO. Lastly, it was reported on June 24, 2015, that Putin’s approval rating is at an historic high at 89%, inferring that virtually all of Russia supports his reckless policy. In the aftermath of a nuclear World War III, Putin will be blamed rather that the CIA who orchestrated the nuclear conflict to begin with.

IV. PRE-WORLD WAR III PROGRAMMING:

Russia

4.1: World War III Saber Rattling
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, saber rattling between the NATO nations and Russia is currently at an all-time high which suggests that a real world attack between the two nations is imminent. Aside from the fact that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska on May 1, 2015, Russia instituted a travel ban against EU officials on May 31, 2015. Less than a week later on June 5, 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military training and exercises to counter Russia. A day later on June 6, 2015, a government reported stated that the U.S. is now considering a harder stance on Russia, one that will predictably lead to war. Two days later on June 7, 2015, U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO, suggesting that an armed conflict is only a matter of time. Less than 48-hours later on June 9, 2015, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush called for a tougher policy toward Russia and Putin. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015, a top Russian security official reportedly stated that the “U.S. would like Russia to cease to exist as a country”, a declaration of war if there ever was one. Lastly, that same day, June 22, 2015, the Independent published a report entitled “Russia ‘Aggression’: US Nuclear Missile Commander says Vladimir Putin’s Actions Echo Those of Nazi Germany in the 1930s”, a report evidently designed to invoke a Russian attack and invasion that may be nuclear in nature. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

Putin Russia

4.2: Motives for a Russian Attack
In order to create the necessary narrative in the media prior to unprovoked Russian nuclear strikes against NATO nations, a number of timely motives have been created by the Swiss CIA. For example, on May 31, 2015, it was reported that Russian President Putin was shut out from the G7 Meeting for the second year running. Less than 2-weeks later on June 10, 2015, the United States reportedly overtook Russia as the world’s top oil and gas producer. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. Roughly a week later on June 19, 2015, the EU Parliament voted to prolong economic sanctions against Crimea till June 2016. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, have given Russia at least 4 motives for an attack against NATO, one which may be nuclear in nature.

4.3: Russian Threats
Prior to a World War III between the U.S. and Russia, a number of threats must be leveled from both sides in order to give the perception that the conflict is real and not being orchestrated by the CIA in Switzerland. The first threat was identified on May 8, 2015, when it was reported that Russia intends to restore a spy base in Cuba, some 90 miles from American shores. That same day, May 8, 2015, Russian students projected a Russian-based tank attack on the White House, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to foreshadow a Russian attack on America. Roughly a month later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep. Since NATO is currently moving military equipment to its border with Russia, a Russian attack is forthcoming. Three days later on June 19, 2015, Russian President Putin stated that no one should talk to Russia through ultimatums, inferring that he will no longer be subjugated by the West. That same day, June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO, an off-handed threat to Ukraine which did in fact join NATO. Lastly, on June 23, 2015, a senior Russian diplomat stated that Russia will longer accept lectures from the United States. The timely comments were designed to show that Russia feels belittled by NATO and may lash out, possibly with nuclear strikes. Needless to say, these threats, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

4.4: Close Calls
Aside from the aforementioned World War III rhetoric and propaganda, there have been a number of close calls which have set the scene for a military showdown between the United States and Russia. One of these incidents could be misinterpreted (purposely of course) which could translate into a hot war between Russia and U.S. and NATO forces. The first close call between the U.S. and Russia was reported on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea. The incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia naval conflict in the Black Sea. This notion is confirmed by NATO war games ongoing in the Black Sea. A day later on June 1, 2015, it was reported that Russian and U.S. planes had a close encounter near Crimea, foreshadowing an aerial-related conflict between the two countries. Again, the incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia conflict in Ukraine. Nine days later on June 10, 2015, it was reported that a Russian jet reportedly harassed U.S. reconnaissance plane, otherwise known as a spy plane. According to reports, the Russian Su-27 fighters reportedly intercepted a US RC-135 intelligence aircraft on May 30, 2015. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a similar incident will lead to a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia.

World War III US & Russia

4.5: World War III Propaganda
Prior to World War III between the U.S. and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, U.S. versus Russia propaganda is now at an all-time high which suggests that a false-flag attack that triggers a nuclear World War III is imminent. This particular narrative was first identified by Truther.org back on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea, causing the Russian defense minister to state that the incident “pose[d] a danger to strategic stability” between the two countries. Roughly a week later on June 8, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Russia has Better Things To Do than Start WW3”, raising the notion of World War III involving Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations visited Ukraine, slamming Russian ‘aggression’. The timely comment foreshadows a Russian-based attack on Ukraine, one which may be nuclear in nature. Five days later on June 16, 2015, Russia herself warned of a “new military confrontation” in Europe, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia will be at war in Europe in the near future. A day later on June 17, 2015, CNN published a report entitled “U.S.-Russia Military Tit for Tat Raises Fears of Greater Conflict”, suggesting that a local U.S.-Russian conflict could translate into World War III. Lastly, on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III between the U.S. and Russia.

V. WORLD WAR III ARMS BUILDUP:

5.1: Russian Military Buildup
Prior to the start of World War III, Russia must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 15, 2015, when it was reported that Russia may beef up its border if U.S. military arms are stationed in Eastern Europe. Since U.S. arms are now flowing into NATO countries such as Poland, it can be assumed that Russia has made good on its promise. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was Russian President Putin stated that Russia will get 40 new nuclear intercontinental missiles this year, an ominous sign that nuclear war is imminent. Less than 24-hours later on June 17, 2015, it was reported that the Russian military is developing an anti-drone microwave gun. The timely propaganda report was designed to associate an aerial aircraft (drone) with radiation (microwave) just prior to nuclear airstrikes by Russia, most likely in America and/or Eastern Europe. Lastly, that same day, June 17, 2015, Russia showed off its news military equipment and vehicles at Army 2015 Expo near Moscow, a flexing of the Russian military muscle if you will. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

5.2: US & NATO Military Buildup

Prior to the start of World War III, NATO must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 4, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S, may deploy missiles in Europe to counter Russia. Ten days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now in talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe. That same day, June 14, 2015, it was reported that Poland and Lithuania discussing plans with the U.S. to harbor military equipment. Said talks became reality a day later on June 15, 2015, when the Pentagon reportedly sent heavy military equipment to Eastern Europe. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force may send F-22s to Europe over the “threat” from Russia. The massive military escalation in Eastern Europe was confirmed on June 18, 2015, when it was reported that NATO is conducting the biggest beef up of defenses since the Cold War. That same day, June 18, 2015, it was also reported that the Pentagon is now building a cruise missile shield to defend U.S. cities from Russia, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that U.S. cities will be attacked by Russian missiles, most likely nuclear in nature. Four days later on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive NATO arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III. The ongoing NATO buildup of weapons was confirmed yet again on June 5, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military aid to NATO to counter Russia. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015: Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide weapons, aircraft and commandos to NATO. A day later on June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. military is now moving tanks and other equipment to allied nations near the Russian border, including but not limited to: 250 military vehicles and Abrams tanks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

5.3: Black Sea Naval Buildup
In order to create the scene for a spectacular World War III battle between the U.S. and Russia, both sides must get their aircraft and ships in position prior an attack. Aside from the USS Taylor (FFG-50) and the USS Mount Whitney (LCC-20) which were originally stationed in the Black Sea during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, the U.S. has also sent the USS Truxtun to the Black Sea which is part of the USS George H.W. Bush strike group stationed in Mediterranean. On the Russian side, there are a total of 7 ships in the Black Sea. According to a March 5, 2014 report, two Russian warships have now entered the Black Sea through the Bosphorus en route to Crimea. The 150 ‘Saratov’ landing ship and the 156 ‘Yamal’ assault ship will reportedly join five other Russian naval ships which are currently stationed in the port city of Sevastopol which is adjacent to Crimea. These ships include the 30th Surface Ship Division, the 41st Missile Boat Brigade, the 247th Separate Submarine Division, the 68th Harbor Defense Ship, and the 422nd Separate Hydrographic Ship Division. In total, there are at least 11 ships in or near the Black Sea.

IV: WHEN RUSSIA ATTACKS
:

6.1: Russian Attacks
In order to set the precedent for an unprecedented nuclear attack by Russia, a narrative has been created in the media by the Swiss CIA that Russia is responsible for a wave of cyber-attacks against the United States, setting the precedent for a far greater attack. This particular narrative was first identified back on January 18, 2014, when it was reported that Russia created the ‘BlackPOS Malware’ to hack Target and Neiman Marcus. Roughly 3-months later on April 8, 2015, it was reported that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. The notion of a Russia-based attack was foreshadowed by Russian President Putin on June 6, 2015, when he stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. Three days later on June 9, 2015, it was reported that the television station TV5 Monde was attack by Russia-based hackers. In the event that Russia launches nuclear strikes against NATO, the world’s TV stations will likely be simultaneously hijacked by a cyber-attack so that the world will collectively witness the nuclear detonation on live on TV. Lastly, on August 6, 2015, it was reported that Russia is “strongly suspected” of the latest cyberattack on the Pentagon.

ISIS Russia Putin II

6.2: Russia Terror Attacks
In the last 2-years, at least 5 terror-related incidents (see below) have either been committed by Russian terrorists and/or the Russia government. Whether or not these Russian-based terror attacks will commence with a Russian terror attacks against NATO countries is not known, but it’s highly likely. Said attacks will likely transpire a few days prior to a full-scale nuclear attack by Russia. The notion that terror attacks are now in play for NATO was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, on June 22, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide commandos to NATO. Translation: Special Forces (i.e., professional terrorists) will be used to commit terror attacks in NATO countries (e.g., Lithuania, Poland, etc.). This notion that Russian-based terrorism is imminent was confirmed on June 5, 2015, when it was reported that a 19-year old Russian girl was an ISIS recruit. The girl was reportedly one 13 Russians who were on their way to join ISIS in Syria. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 17, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Pentagon Trained ISIS Unleashed on Russia”, associating Russia with ISIS just prior to state-sponsored Islamic terror attacks in NATO countries. That same day, June 17, 2015, Moscow reportedly launches an anti-ISIS training program for Russian imams, further associating Russia with ISIS just prior to Islamic terror attacks against NATO. Once a war between the U.S. and a Russia commences, it’s highly likely that the creation and funding of ISIS will be blamed on Russia, instead of the CIA in Switzerland where it belongs.

Russian Terror Timeline
:

1. April 15, 2013: Russian Brothers Tsarnaev Execute Boston Marathon Bombings (Boston, MA)
2. December 29, 2013: 14 Dead after Suicide Bombing at Russia Railway Station (Volgograd, Russia)
3. December 30, 2014: Second Suicide Bomber hits Russian City, 14 Killed (Volgograd, Russia)
4. January 25, 2014: Russian Teen Charged in US with Weapon of Mass Destruction (Altoona, PA)
5. August 8, 2015: Jury convicts Russian commander of terror-related charges (Richmond, VA)
6. August 12, 2015: US jury convicts Uzbek refugee of 3 terrorism-related charges (Boise, ID)
7. September 16, 2015: Russian national pleads guilty in major corporate hack attack (Camden, NJ)

[Does not purport to be a complete list of Russian-related terror attacks]

VII. WORLD WAR III ENDGAME:

henry-gruver-russian-invasion-of-america-last-days

7.1: World War III Endgame
In the wake of Russian nuclear attacks in Ukraine or elsewhere, a European Union-type of army will likely be formed to counter Russia. This particular notion was foreshadowed back on March 8, 2015, it was reported that the current President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, called for the creation of EU army. Russian nuclear attacks in Eastern Europe will also provide the Swiss government the political capital it needs to drastically change their current asylum and immigration laws, likely resulting in the immediate removal of all European Union citizens, whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor included. Draconian changes to Swiss asylum and immigration law will predictably result in Taylor’s deportation and subsequent assassination, which is exactly why the CIA in Switzerland is now targeting Europe with Russian nuclear strikes. The notion that Switzerland will deport foreigners was foreshadowed by The Local back on June 19, 2015, when they published a report entitled “Russian Crisis Threatens 40,000 Swiss Jobs”. In the United States, nuclear war will lead to martial law as well as the naked dictatorship of one Barack Hussein Obama. As dictator, Obama will execute Rex 84, a classified government scenario that features a military dictatorship in order to carry out the industrial slaughter of millions of Americans.

7.2: Nuclear Cold War
In the wake of Russian nuclear attack in Ukraine or elsewhere, Putin will predictably blame the U.S. and Obama will predictably blame Russia. This will of course escalate tensions between the two nations which will eventually lead to a new nuclear Cold War. A new and improved U.S. versus Russia feud is coincidentally the theme of the televisions show entitled “The Americans” (2013), as well as the new television mini-series entitled “The Assets” (see trailer) which premiered in the U.S. on January 2, 2014.

About the Author
David Chase Taylor is an American journalist and the editor-in-chief of Truther.org, a state-sponsored terror whistle-blower website. Taylor currently lives in Switzerland where he applied for political asylum on July 17, 2015. Taylor authored The Nuclear Bible, a book credited with foiling a nuclear terror attack upon Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011, and Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now, a book and website exposing the true power structure of the world, especially in respect to Greenland and its primary proxy state of Switzerland which is coincidentally home to the CIA. Taylor has also published The Bio-Terror Bible, a book and website exposing the global bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. To date, Taylor has blown the whistle on over 100 state-sponsored terror plots, including the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror Plot, the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the Terrorgate Scandal, the 2014 Memorial Day Massacre, the man-made asteroid attack planned for 2015, and the drone strike which killed “Fast and Furious” star Paul Walker. Taylor was also the first to expose Alex Jones’ treacherous links to STRATFOR and is noted for the 10 reasons why the Rosetta Comet landing was a hoax.

READ: World’s ‘Most Wanted’ Whistle-Blower Journalist David Chase Taylor Applies for Political Asylum in Switzerland

Truther.org Legal Disclaimer
Truther.org’s stated purpose is to stop terrorism by drawing unwanted global attention to terror plots prior to their fruition. Terror alerts and warnings made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility that they may occur based on breaking terror-related news, events and data. Historically speaking, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed, it is immediately canceled, postponed, or reworked (e.g., the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Freedom Tower Nuclear Terror Plot, etc.). State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats, create plausible deniability, and mislead the public from the usual suspects of terror which work at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland. Please support real citizen journalism and help make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste

0001 SAFDCT
customLogo.gif
truther-rss

Download & Forward PDF

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor, officially applied for political asylum in Switzerland on July 17, 2015, the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called “natural disasters” I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, the Swiss CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in Switzerland, know this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland was harboring the CIA; and b) the CIA has historically not shat where it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland.

RED DAWN SCENARIO: CIA Plotting Chinese Pearl Harbor-Like Surprise Attack—Cloaked Chinese Drone Attack, US Drone Cyber-Hijack Attack & Sub-Based Nuclear Strike on US Top Terror Scenarios

WORLD WAR III: CIA Plotting Proxy War Between US & Russia in Syria to Spark World War III—Russian-Based Nuclear Missile Strike on US and/or Russian-Based Attack/Invasion of Alaska, Syria and/or Ukraine Imminent

NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST: CIA Plotting Wave of Iranian Nuclear Terror Attacks in America—LA, NYC, DC & NFL Cities Most Likely to Suffer Attack

ISIS ENDGAME:
How & Why the CIA Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks

BOOM: CIA Plotting Man-Made Asteroid Strike this October—JADE HELM States, Gulf of Mexico & Pacific Rim of Fire Most Likely to Suffer Attack

BREAKING NEWS: CERN Is Secret Entrance to Subterranean CIA Headquarters Located Beneath Lake Geneva in Switzerland

RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA

David Chase Taylor
October 5, 2015
Truther.org

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Ever since Truther.org revealed that the CIA in Switzerland created ISIS as political cover for nuclear and biological terror attacks, CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva has been grooming Russia for a confrontation with the U.S. that will predictably lead to World War III.

In short, the 700-year cover of the CIA in Switzerland was officially blown for the first time in history by whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor in his shocking new book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) and therefore the Swiss CIA is beyond desperate to start World War III.

It is imperative to note that NATO, Russia, the United States and its two respective puppets named Putin and Obama are under the command and control of the CIA in Switzerland, all of which are indirectly funded by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland.

Exactly what type of Russian attack us now in play is not known, but a Russian-based cyber terror-attack and/or nuclear missile strike on the U.S., and/or the Russian invasion of Alaska and/or Ukraine are possible. That being said, it now appears that a full-scale proxy war between the U.S. and Russia in Iraq and Syria is imminent.

ISIS and/or Russian-related terror attacks in Alaska, Iraq, Poland, Syria or Ukraine may also be imminent. In the aftermath of the attacks, the CIA will predictably state that Russia has been funding the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) from its inception.

That being said, it now appears that CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva is planning to stage the Russian invasion of Iraq. Since ISIS is defined as the “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria”, the logical step after attacking Syria is for Russia to finish the job in Iraq.

The notion that Russia will invade Iraq was first identified back on September 26, 2015, when it was reported that Russia, Iran, Iraq and Syria are setting up a “joint information center” to coordinate anti-ISIS operations. Translation: Russia is setting up logistics to take over Iraq and Syria.

The notion that Russia is not done invading the Middle East was highlighted in a CNN report from September 27, 2015, entitled “Russia’s Syria Expedition: Why Now and What’s Next?”. Evidently, what’s next for Russia is the full-scale invasion of Iraq.

This notion was confirmed in an October 5, 2015, report entitled “Preview Of World War III? Russia Is Putting On A Display Of Firepower That Is Shocking The World”, which quoted Russian political commentator Yulia Latynina who stated that Russia wants to see the destruction of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

A day after launching a campaign of airstrikes in Syria, Russia announced that it is now considering going into Iraq. A foreign ministry representative from Russia stated that they would consider any request from Iraq to conduct anti-ISIS airstrikes in the country.

Iraqi President Haider al-Abadi reportedly told Western news outlets that Russian airstrikes were “a possibility” and that Iraq would “welcome it”. In the event that Russia invades Iraq, U.S. forces will respond with violence, leading to World War III between the U.S. and Russia.

TOP RUSSIAN ATTACK SCENARIOS:

1. Russian Proxy War with U.S. in Syria
2. Russian Proxy War with U.S. in Iraq
3. Attack on U.S. by Russian Ships in Mediterranean (e.g., Moskva, Saratov, Smetlivy, etc.)
4.
Russian WMD Missile Strike on America
5. Russian Attack/Invasion of Alaska
6. Russian-Based Cyber-Terror Attack
7. Russian Attack/Invasion of Ukraine and/or NATO country

Putin Russia

Russian Attack Trending
In order to provide a timely motive for a Russian-based attack on the United States, it was reported back on August 11, 2015, that the hit TV terror show “Homeland” will take on Russian President Vladimir Putin in season 5. Three days later on August 14, 2015, it was reported that a classified Pentagon exercises revealed that the U.S. would struggle to win a war with Russia. The timely report of the once classified exercise was designed to foreshadow the notion that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent. Then notion that a deadly conflict between the U.S. and Russia is imminent was confirmed on September 19, 2015, when Russia Today published a report entitled “Pentagon Updates Plans for War with ‘Potentially Aggressive’ Russia”. In what appears to be a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to highlight Russia on an international level just prior to an unprecedented attack, it was reported on September 22, 2015, that former U.S. military General David Petraeus accused Putin of trying to re-establish Russian Empire. A day later on September 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Kremlin Promises ‘Counter-Steps’ in Reply to US Deploying Nuclear Weapons to Germany”. Needless to say, the escalation of U.S. weapons in Europe has provided a timely motive for a Russian-based attack on the U.S. or her troops in Syria. Roughly a week later on October 1, 2015, it was reported that Russia is “pouring gasoline on the fire” in Syria as airstrikes hit CIA-backed rebels, providing a timely motive for a revenge attack by the United States that will most likely be blamed on Russia. That same day, October 1, 2015, U.S. Senator John McCain stated that the Syrian Rebels should shoot down Russian planes in Syria, raising the notion of incoming Russian aircraft just prior to the aerial invasion of Iraq by Russia. In order to sell the notion that Russia is planning the full-scale invasion just prior to its fruition in reality, it was reported on October 1, 2015, that Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree drafting 150,000 conscripts into the Russian military. Lastly, four days later on October 5, 2015, it was reported that Turkish jets intercepted a Russian plane. The incident was likely staged by the CIA in order to foreshadow the notion of a Russian aerial invasion which will most likely take place in Alaska, Iraq, Poland, Syria or Ukraine.

putin-binoculars-AP

Latest Russian War Games
Back on September 20, 2015, it was reported that Russia’s biggest-ever military drill entitled “Center-2015” is ending its final stage. Whether the final stage involves a direct attack on America or a proxy attack on U.S. troops (i.e., ISIS) in Iraq or Syria is not known, but it’s highly likely. Russia’s Center-2015, which began on September 14, 2015, targeted “terrorists” and involved 95,000 Russian servicemen, over 7,000 military hardware and vehicles, 170 military aircraft, and 20 warships. Consequently, it’s possible that the CIA will use Russian troops to exterminate the U.S.-lead ISIS. Four days later on September 24, 2015, Russia announced naval drills in the “east Mediterranean” that will take place this September and October. The drills will reportedly involve “40 combat exercises, including rocket and artillery fire at sea and airborne targets”. Needless to say, the drills will go live at some point. The Russian drills will reportedly include three warships from Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, including the Saratov landing ship, the Moskva guided missile cruiser and the Russian Destroyer Smetlivy. Consequently, it’s highly likely that one or more of these ships will be involved in a naval confrontation with U.S. or NATO allies in the region.

I. OTHER WORLD WAR III FLASHPOINTS:

1.1: Global Flashpoints
Whenever blood must be spilled by the CIA, disputed areas like Crimea (Eastern Europe), Jerusalem (Middle East), Kashmir (Central Asia) or the Senkaku Islands (Asia) are suddenly inflamed by the CIA through the television channels which they control outright. Consequently, politicians, soldiers and militaries equipment are moved like pawns in the global scheme run by the Swiss CIA. In respect to the impending World War III scenario between the U.S. and Russia, Truther.org has identified 5 flashpoints which are blinking red in respect to a Russian-based attack, invasion or terror attacks.

ISIS Russia Putin I

1.2: Russian Attack on Syria
Based on breaking news and events, it appears that CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva is plotting a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia in Syria. Said proxy war is designed to spark a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia which will lead to World War III. This particular narrative was first identified back on September 8, 2015, when the New York Times published a report entitled “U.S. Moves to Block Russian Military Buildup in Syria”, confirming that Russia is essentially invading Syria. Two days later on September 10, 2015, the U.S. reportedly warned Russia on its military buildup in Syria, giving Russia an ultimatum in respect to Syria. That same day, September 10, 2015, it was reported that Russian troops have joined the fight in Syria to “prop up” Assad. In other words, Russia is now publically backing Assad in Syria and therefore is diametrically opposed to the Syrian Rebels which are being funded by Obama to oust Assad. Four days later on September 14, 2015, it was reported that Russia is shipping tanks into Syria, the “first clear sign of offensive weapons” in Syria. Translation: a Russian offensive involving tanks in Syria appears imminent. That same day, September 14, 2015, the Pentagon reportedly stated that Russia is establishing a new military air base in Syria. Consequently, a full-scale aerial-based confrontation between the U.S. and Syria appears imminent. Lastly, in what appears to be the military drill for the Russian invasion of Syria, it was reported on September 14, 2015, that 95,000 Russian troops are now engaged in massive military drill entitled Centre-2015. Said military drill will likely go live in just a matter of time. A day later on September 15, 2015, the BBC published a report entitled “Syria Conflict: Russia ‘to Continue Assad Military Aid’”, further confirming the notion that a proxy war between the Obama-funded Syrian Rebels and the Putin-funded Assad is brewing. A day later on September 16, 2015, CNN published a report entitled “U.S. Looks on Warily as Russian Helicopters Arrive in Syria”, further confirming Russia’s military buildup in Syria. Roughly 24-hours later on September 17, 2015, the BBC published a report entitled “What is Russia’s Role in Syria?”, drawing international media publicity to Russia motives just prior to the start of a proxy war in Syria. A day later on September 18, 2015, Foreign Policy published a report entitled “The Pentagon Is Preparing New War Plans for a Baltic Battle Against Russia”, confirming that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent, although a conflict in Syria is far more likely than in the Baltics. Also on September 18, 2015, Fox News reported that US-Russia military talks will begin amid Russia’s military buildup in Syria, drawing international attention to the escalating conflict. Also on September 18, 2015, it was reported that Russia has moved its first tactical fighter jets to a military base in Syria, further confirming Russia’s military buildup in Syria. That same day, traitorous Infowars published a report on September 18, 2015, entitled “Putin Sends Tanks to Syria: Largest Deployment of Outside Russian Forces Since USSR Collapse”, essentially confirming that Russia has invaded Syria. Also on September 18, 2015, it was reported that the Syrian Army is starting to use new weapons provided to them by Russia, confirming that a proxy war in Syria has already begun. Three days later on September 21, 2015, Russia reportedly began flying unmanned drones over Syria, and is sending more fighter jets to the region. A day later on September 22, 2015, the Wall Street Journal published a report entitled “Russia Expands Military Presence in Syria, Satellite Photos Show”, further corroborating the notion that Russia military involvement in Syria is escalating prior to the impending proxy war. Lastly, a day later on September 23, 2015, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry warned that the U.S. and Russia may clash in Syria, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that the CIA is indeed plotting a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia in Syria. Said proxy war will no doubt lead to a nuclear World War III. Four days later on September 27, 2015, Putin stated that the U.S. proxy war in Syria violates international law, confirming that a proxy was in Syria is already in progress. Three days later on September 30, 2015, the Russian parliament unanimously approved the use of military forces to fight ISIS in Syria. Translation: Russia is planning a lengthy incursion of Syria. Two days later on October 2, 2015, it was reported that Russia launched 18 attacks in Syria which reportedly destroyed an ISIS command center, bomb factory and training camp.

Putin Crimea

1.3: Russian Attack on Ukraine
Considering that Ukraine, a NATO nation, was already invaded by Russia during the crisis in Crimea, it’s the most likely country in Europe to suffer a Russian attack and secondary invasion. Based on recent news in respect to both Ukraine and nuclear warfare, a nuclear strike in Ukraine now appears to be in order. This particular narrative was first identified back on March 15, 2015, when Putin stated that Russia was preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary” while simultaneously blaming the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Ukraine. Roughly a month later on April 28, 2015, it was reported that forest fires were heading for Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine. Roughly a month later on June 5, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Kiev to Allow Foreign Armed Forces in Ukraine, incl. ‘Potential Carriers of Nukes’”. These 4 reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based nuclear strike on Ukraine is imminent. The nuclear attack will likely happen just prior to, during, or right after the U.S. led NATO invasion of Ukraine. In order to foreshadow further Russian aggression in Ukraine, CNN published a report on June 11, 2015, entitled “U.S. Ambassador to U.N. Visits Ukraine, Slams Russian ‘Aggression’”. Four days later on June 15, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, starting that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. In a clear sign that war in Ukraine is imminent, it was reported on June 18, 2015, that Iraq War criminal Tony Blair will take on an advisory role in Ukraine. Three days later on June 21, 2015, Ukraine’s Right Sector rejects the Minsk deal, calling for a renewed offensive in Ukraine. The notion that war is about to break out in Ukraine was confirmed on June 22, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S. will provide weapons for NATO commandos to attack Ukrainian separatists. That same day, June 22, 2015, it was also reported that a member of Kiev’s top brass ‘defects’ to anti-government forces. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the traitorous general will lead the opposition to Russia in the coming war. A day later on June 23, 2015, the Guardian published a report entitled “EU Extends Sanctions against Russia as Ukraine Conflict Rumbles On”. Although the conflict in Ukraine has been dormant for months, it apparently going to get a shot in the arm. Lastly, in what appears to be pre-nuclear terror programming for Ukraine, it was reported on August 6, 2015, that ISIS uranium smugglers were busted in special op in western Ukraine. In what appears to be pre-Russian attack on Ukraine programing, it was reported on August 22, 2015, that Ukrainian leader Poroshenko stated that the Minsk agreement allows for a Kiev military buildup. In other words, the CIA is plotting a new war between Ukraine and Russia, hence the military buildup. In what appears to be an ominous sign of Ukrainian terror to come, it was reported on August 31, 2015, that 1 person was killed and 100 injured in political clashes in Ukraine. The state-sponsored riots are a red flag that war in Ukraine is imminent. Lastly, on September 14, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “U.S.-Installed Ukrainian Regime Now Fears Return of Donbass to Ukraine”, further foreshadowing a proxy war between NATO-led U.S. and Russia in Ukraine. Roughly 10-days later on September 25, 2015, it was reported that Ukraine’s president signed a new military doctrine which named Russia as the biggest threat. The timely report was designed to provide a timely motive for a Russian-based revenge attack. Four days later on September 29, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon’s top official on Russia and Ukraine was resigning. The resignation was likely due to a Russian-Syria proxy war terror plot which was foiled four days prior on September 25, 2015. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based attack/invasion of Ukraine is imminent.

US Russia World War III

1.4: Russian Attack on Alaska
Although a Russian-based attack could theoretically transpire anywhere along its vast borders (e.g., Poland, Sweden, Ukraine, etc.), breaking news suggest that the U.S. state of Alaska will suffer a Russian attack and subsequent invasion. Considering Alaska was purchased from Russia for only $7.2 million in 1867, an invasion to take it back is all but expected. The notion that the U.S. in concerned about the potential Russian invasion of Alaska was recently rehashed on September 1, 2014, by Telegraph report entitled “America’s Secret Plan to Stop Russian Invasion of Alaska Revealed” which highlighted the Operation Washtub. According to reports, Operation Washtub was a U.S. military program designed to recruit Alaskan fishermen, trappers and bush pilots as “stay-behind agents” to form a secret American resistance network if and when Russia staged a widely-feared invasion of the state. The notion that Russia is targeting Alaska was first identified on May 1, 2015, when it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska. The incident conforms, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing an attack on Alaska. Shortly thereafter in June of 2015, the U.S. war game exercise entitled Northern Edge 2015 was executed in Alaska. The drills reportedly involved more than 200 aircraft and 6,000 U.S. soldiers from all four branches of the military. The unprecedented drill appears to be the U.S. military’s planned response to the impending Russian invasion. In order to sell the notion that a Russian invasion is imminent, Russian bombers executed a flyby of Alaska on July 4, 2015. Considering that the incident was not reported until 3-weeks later, it can be deduced that the incident was fabricated by the CIA in order to foreshadow a Russia attack on Alaska. The notion that Russia is about to stage an invasion of the artic was foreshadowed in an August 8, 2015, report from Fox News entitled “Republicans Slam Obama Administration as Russia Tries Arctic Land Grab”. Considering that Alaska is in the artic, an invasion by Russia may be forthcoming. In order to foreshadow that native Alaskans will suddenly become Russia citizens, it was also reported on August 11, 2015, that visa-free travel to Russia will be reinstated for eligible Alaska Natives. The shocking development was designed to show that diplomatic relations with Russia are about to change in a major way. A day later on August 12, 2015, it was reported that Japanese paratroopers took part in landmark jump over Alaska. Needless to say, the timely report was designed to foreshadow an invasion of Alaska, most likely by Russian paratroopers. In what appears to be an ominous sign that a Russian invasion of the U.S. is imminent, it was reported on August 13, 2015, that Russia has moved a huge number of troops to its western border. The alleged move by Russia is an apparent fake to invade Europe while they secretly plot to invade Alaska. A day later on August 14, 2015, it was reported that a classified Pentagon exercises revealed that the U.S. would struggle to win a war with Russia. The timely report of the once classified exercise was designed to foreshadow the notion that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent. That same day, August 14, 2015, it was also reported that the American F-35 fighter is “inferior” to Russia’s Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter aircraft. Again, the timely report was designed to show that the U.S. is inferior to Russia just prior to the surprise attack and/or invasion of Alaska. A day later on August 15, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Radical Christians Raid Soviet Art Show in Moscow”. The timely report was designed to foreshadow a Russian “raid” just prior to the full-scale invasion of Alaska by Russia. In what appears to be pre-Russian attack politics, it was reported on August 16, 2015, that Russia is now squeezing critics at home by declaring them “foreign agents”. In other words, Putin is now cracking down on dissent just prior to an unprovoked attack on America, namely Alaska. In order to put Alaska in the international spotlight just prior to Russian invasion, it was reported on August 18, 2015, that the U.S. will now let Shell drill for oil off the coast of Alaska. Considering that Shell has been drilling in Alaska for years, it can be deduced that the report is a fabricated propaganda report. That same day, August 18, 2015, it was reported that an Alaska Village is now seeking to be reunited with their Russian relatives. Again, the timely report was designed to foreshadow that Alaska will be reunited with Russia post-Russian invasion. Lastly, on August 19, 2015, it was reported that 3 men are missing and presumed dead after several landslides in Alaska. The landslides were man-made in nature in order to put Alaska in the national media spotlight just prior to an attack.

1.5: Russian Attack on Poland
The notion that NATO and Russia are about to go to war was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO. Three days later on June 10, 2015, NATO started “very high readiness” war games in Poland, providing a timely motive for a Russian-based attack. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. The CIA-spawned hoax was a publicity stunt designed to provide another timely motive for a Russian-based attack on NATO. Three days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now win talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe, posing a direct threat to Russia. The notion of Russian tanks rolling into Poland was ominously foreshadowed on June 14, 2015, when the Sunday Times published a report entitled “German Tanks Roll Back into Poland”. Similar to the invasion of Crimea, the impending invasion of Poland will be used to sell the notion of a new Cold War between Russia and the West. In order to provide another blatant motive for a Russian attack on Poland, it was reported on June 14, 2015, that Poland has erected observation towers on its border with Russia. The red-and-white metal radio-tower-like structures are reportedly equipped with cameras, rising up to 164 feet. A day later on June 15, 2015, it was confirmed that the U.S. will store heavy weapons in Poland under NATO’s new plan, proving yet another motive for a Russian-based attack on Poland, Islamic terrorist or otherwise. Lastly, the notion that Russia is planning a retaliatory attack on NATO was all but confirmed on June 16, 2015, when it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep in Poland. Consequently, an Islamic and/or Russian based attack is expected.

1.6: Russian Attack on Sweden
Aside from being an active participant in numerous NATO war games, Sweden borders Russia to the West and therefore is the most likely of the Western European countries to suffer a direct attack or invasion by Russia. Although a nuclear strike on Sweden is highly unlikely, a bio-terror attack is a far more realistic possibility, possibly sparking the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. The notion of a Sweden-based bio-terror attack was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when it was reported that migrant beggars in Sweden were attacked with acid. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO.

II. RUSSIAN ATTACK:

Russia Putin

2.1: Russian Missile Strike
Since the CIA has thus far been unable to execute a Russian-based attack on the United States, they may resort to staging Russian-based WMD missile strikes on America. Said attack will most likely originate from a submarine within the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean. In what appears to be pre-Russian missile strike programing, it was reported back on June 16, 2015, that Russian President Putin stated that Russia will create 40 new intercontinental missiles this year, all of which are nuclear in nature. Roughly 2-months later on August 11, 2015, it was reported that the White House blocked a Pentagon report on a missile treaty that was breached by Russia. Considering that Russia allegedly violated the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, nuclear missile strikes by Russia may now be forthcoming. In order to highlight Russia and nuclear missiles just prior to a staged nuclear attack, it was reported on August 19, 2015, that the Russia has moved ahead with a missile sale to Iran. That same day, August 19, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force has test-launched an unarmed missile from California. The so-called missile test appears to be a beta-test for a Russian-based nuclear strike on California, most likely targeting Los Angeles and/or San Francisco. Lastly, that same day, August 19, 2015, it was also reported that the U.S. military has launched a second airship near Baltimore to test America’s missile defense system. Again, the missile defense test appears to be a beta-test for a Russian-based nuclear strike on east coast of America, most likely targeting New York City and/or Washington, D.C.

Putin Nuke Nuclear

2.2: Russian Nuclear Terror Attack
Exactly one month before the aforementioned book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) was published on December 21, 2014, Forbes published a report on November 21, 2014, entitled “Does Russia Think Their New Nuclear Weapons Could Win A War?”. This was the first-ever report identified by Truther.org which foreshadowed an unprecedented and unprovoked nuclear strike by Russia. Ever since revelations where made public that Switzerland harbors the CIA, the international media (which operates at the behest of the CIA) has been inundated with the Russian nuclear attack narrative. For example, it was reported back on March 15, 2015, that Vladimir Putin stated that Russia is preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary”. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin again threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Crimea in Ukraine. It is imperative to note that the latter two reports invoking Ukraine and a nuclear attack are key because aside from the United States, Ukraine is most likely NATO country to suffer a Russian nuclear strike. Roughly a month later on May 1, 2015, it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska, conforming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing a nuclear strike. Roughly 4-weeks later on May 27, 2015, a NATO general warned that Russian President Putin is a “dangerous gambler…willing to use nuclear weapons”, an apparent preview of things to come. The notion of a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia was foreshadowed in a Russia Today report from June 7, 2015, entitled “UK Could Host US Nukes to Counter Increased ‘Russian Activity’”, as well as a Telegraph report entitled “Nuclear Missiles Could be Sited Again on British Soil in New ‘Cold War’ with Russia”. In what appears to be an ominous sign of things to come, the Daily Star published a report on June 8, 2015, entitled “Armageddon Strikes: Massive Cloud Sparks Russian Nuclear Attack Panic”. A day later on June 9, 2015, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt was enacted by intelligence operative Mark Dice who created a petition to nuke Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “US and Russia ‘Playing Nuclear Chicken with Each Other’”, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that nuclear war between the two nations is imminent. A day later on June 12, 2015, it was reported that people in Moscow widely oppose the fake petition to nuke America, further raising the specter of nuclear war between the two countries. Five days later on June 17, 2015, Kremlin officials stated that Russia’s nuclear buildup is being forced by the West. Three days later on June 20, 2015, Putin stated that the world was no closer to Cold War-style nuclear standoff, raising the notion of a nuclear confrontation just prior to its fruition in reality. Three days later on June 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “The Pentagon Goes Nuclear on Russia” which stated that Russian submarines off the coast of America could engage in a “nuclear turkey shoot”, knocking out every major American city within a few minutes. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles which travel through space. Lastly, on June 25, 2015, Reuters published a report entitled “Russia ‘Playing with Fire’ with Nuclear Saber-Rattling”, further inferring that a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia is now in play by the CIA.

2.3: Russian Bio-Terror Attack
Although a Russian-based nuclear attack are the most likely scenario, there is also the chance that the Swiss CIA could spark a biological pandemic in Europe during the impending conflict between the U.S. and Russia. How this bio-terror pandemic will manifest is not yet known, but it has been foreshadowed in the news nonetheless. For example, on June 5, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Expert Predicts Anthrax Attacks Will Be Used to Push Russian War”, consummating the terms Anthrax and Russia within the same headlines. Ten days later on June 15, 2015, Infowars published another report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, stating that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. Needless to say, one of these bio-labs in Eastern Europe could be directly attacked or suffer collateral damage, leading to a biological outbreak that could spark the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015.

2.4: Russian Cyber-Attack
In the aftermath of unprecedented cyber-related terror attacks on the travel industry, the Swiss CIA will may finger Russia. In order to create the narrative in the media that Russia is actively targeting America with cyber-related attacks, it was reported back on April 8, 2015, that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network, a fraudulent notion to be sure. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks, an apparent preview of things to come. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. Lastly, less than 2-weeks later on June 9, 2015, TV5 Monde was reportedly attacked ‘by Russia-based hackers’, setting the precedent the impending attack. Lastly, on September 16, 2015, it was reported that a Russian national plead guilty in a major corporate hack attack case, further selling the notion that Russia is targeting the west with cyber-attacks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that Russia will be scapegoated in the aftermath of an unprecedented cyber-terror attack targeting American and/or European airliners, likely leading to a new Cold War.

III. ALL THE WORLD IS A STAGE:

BIS (2)

3.1: US & Russia Funded by BIS in Switzerland
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland is the financial backbone of the CIA in Switzerland which secretly funds its black operations around the world. In short, the BIS funds 60 central banks which are collectively responsible for 95% of the world’s GDP, making it the sole progenitor of the world’s fiat money supply. These central banks include the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States which funds the U.S. government and her military, and the Bank of Russia which funds the Russian government and her military. Consequently, all monies allocated to the U.S. and Russia for World War III originated from the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland which, aside from Vatican City, is the only country to bear a sovereign flag. Consequently, the United States and Russia do not have sovereign flags, meaning that they are not in control of their own destiny nor their own respective militaries.

PutinObama2013G20Summit640

3.2: Presidential Puppets Obama & Putin
Since both U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin are puppets of the CIA, they have no real power and only act when told to do so. In other words, neither of them is actually in charge; they are just political puppets posing for the cameras. However, in order to create the public perception that the beef between the U.S. and Russia is real, Obama reportedly urged G7 leaders to maintain the sanctions on Russia while simultaneously admitting that they don’t work. A day later on June 6, 2015, Putin reportedly stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. The premediated soundbite was given in order to create the perception that Putin is crazy, especially in the aftermath of unprovoked nuclear strikes against the U.S. and NATO. Lastly, it was reported on June 24, 2015, that Putin’s approval rating is at an historic high at 89%, inferring that virtually all of Russia supports his reckless policy. In the aftermath of a nuclear World War III, Putin will be blamed rather that the CIA who orchestrated the nuclear conflict to begin with.

IV. PRE-WORLD WAR III PROGRAMMING:

Russia

4.1: World War III Saber Rattling
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, saber rattling between the NATO nations and Russia is currently at an all-time high which suggests that a real world attack between the two nations is imminent. Aside from the fact that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska on May 1, 2015, Russia instituted a travel ban against EU officials on May 31, 2015. Less than a week later on June 5, 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military training and exercises to counter Russia. A day later on June 6, 2015, a government reported stated that the U.S. is now considering a harder stance on Russia, one that will predictably lead to war. Two days later on June 7, 2015, U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO, suggesting that an armed conflict is only a matter of time. Less than 48-hours later on June 9, 2015, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush called for a tougher policy toward Russia and Putin. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015, a top Russian security official reportedly stated that the “U.S. would like Russia to cease to exist as a country”, a declaration of war if there ever was one. Lastly, that same day, June 22, 2015, the Independent published a report entitled “Russia ‘Aggression’: US Nuclear Missile Commander says Vladimir Putin’s Actions Echo Those of Nazi Germany in the 1930s”, a report evidently designed to invoke a Russian attack and invasion that may be nuclear in nature. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

Putin Russia

4.2: Motives for a Russian Attack
In order to create the necessary narrative in the media prior to unprovoked Russian nuclear strikes against NATO nations, a number of timely motives have been created by the Swiss CIA. For example, on May 31, 2015, it was reported that Russian President Putin was shut out from the G7 Meeting for the second year running. Less than 2-weeks later on June 10, 2015, the United States reportedly overtook Russia as the world’s top oil and gas producer. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. Roughly a week later on June 19, 2015, the EU Parliament voted to prolong economic sanctions against Crimea till June 2016. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, have given Russia at least 4 motives for an attack against NATO, one which may be nuclear in nature.

4.3: Russian Threats
Prior to a World War III between the U.S. and Russia, a number of threats must be leveled from both sides in order to give the perception that the conflict is real and not being orchestrated by the CIA in Switzerland. The first threat was identified on May 8, 2015, when it was reported that Russia intends to restore a spy base in Cuba, some 90 miles from American shores. That same day, May 8, 2015, Russian students projected a Russian-based tank attack on the White House, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to foreshadow a Russian attack on America. Roughly a month later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep. Since NATO is currently moving military equipment to its border with Russia, a Russian attack is forthcoming. Three days later on June 19, 2015, Russian President Putin stated that no one should talk to Russia through ultimatums, inferring that he will no longer be subjugated by the West. That same day, June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO, an off-handed threat to Ukraine which did in fact join NATO. Lastly, on June 23, 2015, a senior Russian diplomat stated that Russia will longer accept lectures from the United States. The timely comments were designed to show that Russia feels belittled by NATO and may lash out, possibly with nuclear strikes. Needless to say, these threats, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

4.4: Close Calls
Aside from the aforementioned World War III rhetoric and propaganda, there have been a number of close calls which have set the scene for a military showdown between the United States and Russia. One of these incidents could be misinterpreted (purposely of course) which could translate into a hot war between Russia and U.S. and NATO forces. The first close call between the U.S. and Russia was reported on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea. The incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia naval conflict in the Black Sea. This notion is confirmed by NATO war games ongoing in the Black Sea. A day later on June 1, 2015, it was reported that Russian and U.S. planes had a close encounter near Crimea, foreshadowing an aerial-related conflict between the two countries. Again, the incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia conflict in Ukraine. Nine days later on June 10, 2015, it was reported that a Russian jet reportedly harassed U.S. reconnaissance plane, otherwise known as a spy plane. According to reports, the Russian Su-27 fighters reportedly intercepted a US RC-135 intelligence aircraft on May 30, 2015. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a similar incident will lead to a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia.

World War III US & Russia

4.5: World War III Propaganda
Prior to World War III between the U.S. and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, U.S. versus Russia propaganda is now at an all-time high which suggests that a false-flag attack that triggers a nuclear World War III is imminent. This particular narrative was first identified by Truther.org back on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea, causing the Russian defense minister to state that the incident “pose[d] a danger to strategic stability” between the two countries. Roughly a week later on June 8, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Russia has Better Things To Do than Start WW3”, raising the notion of World War III involving Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations visited Ukraine, slamming Russian ‘aggression’. The timely comment foreshadows a Russian-based attack on Ukraine, one which may be nuclear in nature. Five days later on June 16, 2015, Russia herself warned of a “new military confrontation” in Europe, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia will be at war in Europe in the near future. A day later on June 17, 2015, CNN published a report entitled “U.S.-Russia Military Tit for Tat Raises Fears of Greater Conflict”, suggesting that a local U.S.-Russian conflict could translate into World War III. Lastly, on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III between the U.S. and Russia.

V. WORLD WAR III ARMS BUILDUP:

5.1: Russian Military Buildup
Prior to the start of World War III, Russia must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 15, 2015, when it was reported that Russia may beef up its border if U.S. military arms are stationed in Eastern Europe. Since U.S. arms are now flowing into NATO countries such as Poland, it can be assumed that Russia has made good on its promise. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was Russian President Putin stated that Russia will get 40 new nuclear intercontinental missiles this year, an ominous sign that nuclear war is imminent. Less than 24-hours later on June 17, 2015, it was reported that the Russian military is developing an anti-drone microwave gun. The timely propaganda report was designed to associate an aerial aircraft (drone) with radiation (microwave) just prior to nuclear airstrikes by Russia, most likely in America and/or Eastern Europe. Lastly, that same day, June 17, 2015, Russia showed off its news military equipment and vehicles at Army 2015 Expo near Moscow, a flexing of the Russian military muscle if you will. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

5.2: US & NATO Military Buildup

Prior to the start of World War III, NATO must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 4, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S, may deploy missiles in Europe to counter Russia. Ten days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now in talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe. That same day, June 14, 2015, it was reported that Poland and Lithuania discussing plans with the U.S. to harbor military equipment. Said talks became reality a day later on June 15, 2015, when the Pentagon reportedly sent heavy military equipment to Eastern Europe. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force may send F-22s to Europe over the “threat” from Russia. The massive military escalation in Eastern Europe was confirmed on June 18, 2015, when it was reported that NATO is conducting the biggest beef up of defenses since the Cold War. That same day, June 18, 2015, it was also reported that the Pentagon is now building a cruise missile shield to defend U.S. cities from Russia, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that U.S. cities will be attacked by Russian missiles, most likely nuclear in nature. Four days later on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive NATO arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III. The ongoing NATO buildup of weapons was confirmed yet again on June 5, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military aid to NATO to counter Russia. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015: Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide weapons, aircraft and commandos to NATO. A day later on June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. military is now moving tanks and other equipment to allied nations near the Russian border, including but not limited to: 250 military vehicles and Abrams tanks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

5.3: Black Sea Naval Buildup
In order to create the scene for a spectacular World War III battle between the U.S. and Russia, both sides must get their aircraft and ships in position prior an attack. Aside from the USS Taylor (FFG-50) and the USS Mount Whitney (LCC-20) which were originally stationed in the Black Sea during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, the U.S. has also sent the USS Truxtun to the Black Sea which is part of the USS George H.W. Bush strike group stationed in Mediterranean. On the Russian side, there are a total of 7 ships in the Black Sea. According to a March 5, 2014 report, two Russian warships have now entered the Black Sea through the Bosphorus en route to Crimea. The 150 ‘Saratov’ landing ship and the 156 ‘Yamal’ assault ship will reportedly join five other Russian naval ships which are currently stationed in the port city of Sevastopol which is adjacent to Crimea. These ships include the 30th Surface Ship Division, the 41st Missile Boat Brigade, the 247th Separate Submarine Division, the 68th Harbor Defense Ship, and the 422nd Separate Hydrographic Ship Division. In total, there are at least 11 ships in or near the Black Sea.

IV: WHEN RUSSIA ATTACKS
:

6.1: Russian Attacks
In order to set the precedent for an unprecedented nuclear attack by Russia, a narrative has been created in the media by the Swiss CIA that Russia is responsible for a wave of cyber-attacks against the United States, setting the precedent for a far greater attack. This particular narrative was first identified back on January 18, 2014, when it was reported that Russia created the ‘BlackPOS Malware’ to hack Target and Neiman Marcus. Roughly 3-months later on April 8, 2015, it was reported that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. The notion of a Russia-based attack was foreshadowed by Russian President Putin on June 6, 2015, when he stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. Three days later on June 9, 2015, it was reported that the television station TV5 Monde was attack by Russia-based hackers. In the event that Russia launches nuclear strikes against NATO, the world’s TV stations will likely be simultaneously hijacked by a cyber-attack so that the world will collectively witness the nuclear detonation on live on TV. Lastly, on August 6, 2015, it was reported that Russia is “strongly suspected” of the latest cyberattack on the Pentagon.

ISIS Russia Putin II

6.2: Russia Terror Attacks
In the last 2-years, at least 5 terror-related incidents (see below) have either been committed by Russian terrorists and/or the Russia government. Whether or not these Russian-based terror attacks will commence with a Russian terror attacks against NATO countries is not known, but it’s highly likely. Said attacks will likely transpire a few days prior to a full-scale nuclear attack by Russia. The notion that terror attacks are now in play for NATO was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, on June 22, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide commandos to NATO. Translation: Special Forces (i.e., professional terrorists) will be used to commit terror attacks in NATO countries (e.g., Lithuania, Poland, etc.). This notion that Russian-based terrorism is imminent was confirmed on June 5, 2015, when it was reported that a 19-year old Russian girl was an ISIS recruit. The girl was reportedly one 13 Russians who were on their way to join ISIS in Syria. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 17, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Pentagon Trained ISIS Unleashed on Russia”, associating Russia with ISIS just prior to state-sponsored Islamic terror attacks in NATO countries. That same day, June 17, 2015, Moscow reportedly launches an anti-ISIS training program for Russian imams, further associating Russia with ISIS just prior to Islamic terror attacks against NATO. Once a war between the U.S. and a Russia commences, it’s highly likely that the creation and funding of ISIS will be blamed on Russia, instead of the CIA in Switzerland where it belongs.

Russian Terror Timeline
:

1. April 15, 2013: Russian Brothers Tsarnaev Execute Boston Marathon Bombings (Boston, MA)
2. December 29, 2013: 14 Dead after Suicide Bombing at Russia Railway Station (Volgograd, Russia)
3. December 30, 2014: Second Suicide Bomber hits Russian City, 14 Killed (Volgograd, Russia)
4. January 25, 2014: Russian Teen Charged in US with Weapon of Mass Destruction (Altoona, PA)
5. August 8, 2015: Jury convicts Russian commander of terror-related charges (Richmond, VA)
6. August 12, 2015: US jury convicts Uzbek refugee of 3 terrorism-related charges (Boise, ID)
7. September 16, 2015: Russian national pleads guilty in major corporate hack attack (Camden, NJ)

[Does not purport to be a complete list of Russian-related terror attacks]

VII. WORLD WAR III ENDGAME:

henry-gruver-russian-invasion-of-america-last-days

7.1: World War III Endgame
In the wake of Russian nuclear attacks in Ukraine or elsewhere, a European Union-type of army will likely be formed to counter Russia. This particular notion was foreshadowed back on March 8, 2015, it was reported that the current President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, called for the creation of EU army. Russian nuclear attacks in Eastern Europe will also provide the Swiss government the political capital it needs to drastically change their current asylum and immigration laws, likely resulting in the immediate removal of all European Union citizens, whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor included. Draconian changes to Swiss asylum and immigration law will predictably result in Taylor’s deportation and subsequent assassination, which is exactly why the CIA in Switzerland is now targeting Europe with Russian nuclear strikes. The notion that Switzerland will deport foreigners was foreshadowed by The Local back on June 19, 2015, when they published a report entitled “Russian Crisis Threatens 40,000 Swiss Jobs”. In the United States, nuclear war will lead to martial law as well as the naked dictatorship of one Barack Hussein Obama. As dictator, Obama will execute Rex 84, a classified government scenario that features a military dictatorship in order to carry out the industrial slaughter of millions of Americans.

7.2: Nuclear Cold War
In the wake of Russian nuclear attack in Ukraine or elsewhere, Putin will predictably blame the U.S. and Obama will predictably blame Russia. This will of course escalate tensions between the two nations which will eventually lead to a new nuclear Cold War. A new and improved U.S. versus Russia feud is coincidentally the theme of the televisions show entitled “The Americans” (2013), as well as the new television mini-series entitled “The Assets” (see trailer) which premiered in the U.S. on January 2, 2014.

About the Author
David Chase Taylor is an American journalist and the editor-in-chief of Truther.org, a state-sponsored terror whistle-blower website. Taylor currently lives in Switzerland where he applied for political asylum on July 17, 2015. Taylor authored The Nuclear Bible, a book credited with foiling a nuclear terror attack upon Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011, and Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now, a book and website exposing the true power structure of the world, especially in respect to Greenland and its primary proxy state of Switzerland which is coincidentally home to the CIA. Taylor has also published The Bio-Terror Bible, a book and website exposing the global bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. To date, Taylor has blown the whistle on over 100 state-sponsored terror plots, including the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror Plot, the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the Terrorgate Scandal, the 2014 Memorial Day Massacre, the man-made asteroid attack planned for 2015, and the drone strike which killed “Fast and Furious” star Paul Walker. Taylor was also the first to expose Alex Jones’ treacherous links to STRATFOR and is noted for the 10 reasons why the Rosetta Comet landing was a hoax.

READ: World’s ‘Most Wanted’ Whistle-Blower Journalist David Chase Taylor Applies for Political Asylum in Switzerland

Truther.org Legal Disclaimer
Truther.org’s stated purpose is to stop terrorism by drawing unwanted global attention to terror plots prior to their fruition. Terror alerts and warnings made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility that they may occur based on breaking terror-related news, events and data. Historically speaking, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed, it is immediately canceled, postponed, or reworked (e.g., the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Freedom Tower Nuclear Terror Plot, etc.). State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats, create plausible deniability, and mislead the public from the usual suspects of terror which work at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland. Please support real citizen journalism and help make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste

0001 SAFDCT
customLogo.gif
truther-rss

Putin Russia

Download & Forward PDF

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor, officially applied for political asylum in Switzerland on July 17, 2015, the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called “natural disasters” I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, the Swiss CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in Switzerland, know this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland was harboring the CIA; and b) the CIA has historically not shat where it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland.

RED DAWN: CIA Plotting September Chinese Attack/Invasion of America, Australia, Japan, Taiwan or Philippines—New Pearl Harbor Attack, Cyber-Attack/Heist of US Banking System, Drone Cyber-Hijack Attack & Chinese Nuke Attack Top Terror Scenarios

ISIS ENDGAME: How & Why the CIA Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks

BOOM: CIA Plotting Man-Made Asteroid Strike this September—JADE HELM States & Gulf of Mexico Most Likely to Suffer Attack

BREAKING NEWS: CERN Is Secret Entrance to Subterranean CIA Headquarters Located Beneath Lake Geneva in Switzerland

RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA

David Chase Taylor
September 25, 2015
Truther.org

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Ever since Truther.org revealed that the CIA in Switzerland created ISIS as political cover for nuclear and biological terror attacks, CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva has been grooming Russia for a confrontation with the U.S. that will predictably lead to World War III.

In short, the 700-year cover of the CIA in Switzerland was officially blown for the first time in history by whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor in his shocking new book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) and therefore the Swiss CIA is beyond desperate to start World War III.

It is imperative to note that NATO, Russia, the United States and its two respective puppets named Putin and Obama are under the command and control of the CIA in Switzerland, all of which are indirectly funded by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland.

Exactly what type of Russian attack us now in play is not known, but a Russian-based cyber terror-attack and/or nuclear missile strike on the U.S., and/or the Russian invasion of Alaska and/or Ukraine is possible. That being said, it now appears that a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia in Syria is imminent.

The notion that Russia is targeting the U.S. was first identified back on May 1, 2015, when it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska. The incident conforms, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing an attack on Alaska.

In order to sell the notion that a Russian invasion is imminent, Russian bombers executed a flyby of Alaska on July 4, 2015. Considering that the incident was not reported until 3-weeks later, it can be deduced that the incident was fabricated by the CIA in order to foreshadow a Russia attack on America.

In order to provide a timely motive for a Russian-based attack on the United States, it was reported on August 11, 2015, that the hit TV terror show “Homeland” will take on Russian President Vladimir Putin in season 5.

That same day, August 11, 2015, it was also reported that the White House blocked a Pentagon report on a missile treaty that was breached by Russia. Considering that Russia allegedly violated the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, a Russian nuclear missile strike on the U.S. may be forthcoming.

In what appears to be an ominous sign that a Russian invasion of the U.S. is imminent, it was reported on August 13, 2015, that Russia has moved a huge number of troops to its western border. The alleged move by Russia is an apparent fake to invade Europe while they secretly plot to invade the U.S. via Alaska.

A day later on August 14, 2015, it was reported that a classified Pentagon exercises revealed that the U.S. would struggle to win a war with Russia. The timely report of the once classified exercise was designed to foreshadow the notion that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent.

In what appears to be pre-Russian attack on Ukraine programing, it was reported on August 22, 2015, that Ukrainian leader Poroshenko stated that the Minsk agreement allows for a Kiev military buildup. In other words, the CIA is plotting a new war between Ukraine and Russia, hence the military buildup.

In what appears to be an ominous sign of Ukrainian terror to come, it was reported on August 31, 2015, that 1 person was killed and 100 injured in political clashes in Ukraine. The state-sponsored riots are a red flag that war in Ukraine is imminent.

Then notion that a deadly conflict between the U.S. and Russia is imminent was confirmed on September 19, 2015, when Russia Today published a report entitled “Pentagon Updates Plans for War with ‘Potentially Aggressive’ Russia”.

A day later on September 20, 2015, it was reported that Russia’s biggest-ever military drill entitled “Center-2015” is ending its final stage. Whether the final stage involves a direct attack on America or a proxy attack on U.S. troops (i.e., ISIS) in Syria is not known, but it’s highly likely.

Russia’s Center-2015, which began on September 14, 2015, targeted “terrorists” and involved 95,000 Russian servicemen, over 7,000 military hardware and vehicles, 170 military aircraft, and 20 warships. Consequently, it’s possible that the CIA will use Russian troops to exterminate the U.S.-lead ISIS.

In what appears to be a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to highlight Russia on an international level just prior to an unprecedented attack, it was reported on September 22, 2015, that former U.S. military General David Petraeus accused Putin of trying to re-establish Russian Empire.

A day later on September 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Kremlin Promises ‘Counter-Steps’ in Reply to US Deploying Nuclear Weapons to Germany”. Needless to say, the escalation of U.S. weapons in Europe has provided a timely motive for a Russian-based attack on the U.S. or her troops in Syria.

In order to further highlight Russia on an international level just prior to an unprecedented conflict between the U.S. and Russia, it was reported on September 24, 2015, that President Obama will meet with Russian President Putin at the United Nations in New York City on September 28, 2015.

Lastly, on September 24, 2015, Russia announced naval drills in the “east Mediterranean” that will take place this September and October. The drills will reportedly involve “40 combat exercises, including rocket and artillery fire at sea and airborne targets”. Needless to say, the drills will go live at some point.

The Russian drills will reportedly include three warships from Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, including the Saratov landing ship, the Moskva guided missile cruiser and the Russian Destroyer Smetlivy. Consequently, it’s highly likely that one or more of these ships will be involved in a naval confrontation with U.S. or NATO allies in the region.

TOP RUSSIAN ATTACK SCENARIOS:

1. Russian Proxy War with U.S. in Syria
2. Russian Naval Attack on U.S. Ships in Mediterranean (e.g., Moskva, Saratov, Smetlivy, etc.)
3.
Russian WMD Missile Strike on America
4. Russian Attack/Invasion of Alaska
5. Russian-Based Cyber-Terror Attack
6. Russian Attack/Invasion of Ukraine and/or NATO country

I. RUSSIAN WMD MISSILE STRIKE:

Mideast Syria Putins Moment Analysis

Mideast Syria Putins Moment Analysis

1.1: Proxy War Between US & Russia Syria
Based on breaking news and events, it appears that CIA Headquarters beneath Lake Geneva is plotting a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia in Syria. Said proxy war is designed to spark a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia which will lead to World War III. This particular narrative was first identified back on September 8, 2015, when the New York Times published a report entitled “U.S. Moves to Block Russian Military Buildup in Syria”, confirming that Russia is essentially invading Syria. Two days later on September 10, 2015, the U.S. reportedly warned Russia on its military buildup in Syria, giving Russia an ultimatum in respect to Syria. That same day, September 10, 2015, it was reported that Russian troops have joined the fight in Syria to “prop up” Assad. In other words, Russia is now publically backing Assad in Syria and therefore is diametrically opposed to the Syrian Rebels which are being funded by Obama to oust Assad. Four days later on September 14, 2015, it was reported that Russia is shipping tanks into Syria, the “first clear sign of offensive weapons” in Syria. Translation: a Russian offensive involving tanks in Syria appears imminent. That same day, September 14, 2015, the Pentagon reportedly stated that Russia is establishing a new military air base in Syria. Consequently, a full-scale aerial-based confrontation between the U.S. and Syria appears imminent. Lastly, in what appears to be the military drill for the Russian invasion of Syria, it was reported on September 14, 2015, that 95,000 Russian troops are now engaged in massive military drill entitled Centre-2015. Said military drill will likely go live in just a matter of time. A day later on September 15, 2015, the BBC published a report entitled “Syria Conflict: Russia ‘to Continue Assad Military Aid’”, further confirming the notion that a proxy war between the Obama-funded Syrian Rebels and the Putin-funded Assad is brewing. A day later on September 16, 2015, CNN published a report entitled “U.S. Looks on Warily as Russian Helicopters Arrive in Syria”, further confirming Russia’s military buildup in Syria. Roughly 24-hours later on September 17, 2015, the BBC published a report entitled “What is Russia’s Role in Syria?”, drawing international media publicity to Russia motives just prior to the start of a proxy war in Syria. A day later on September 18, 2015, Foreign Policy published a report entitled “The Pentagon Is Preparing New War Plans for a Baltic Battle Against Russia”, confirming that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent, although a conflict in Syria is far more likely than in the Baltics. Also on September 18, 2015, Fox News reported that US-Russia military talks will begin amid Russia’s military buildup in Syria, drawing international attention to the escalating conflict. Also on September 18, 2015, it was reported that Russia has moved its first tactical fighter jets to a military base in Syria, further confirming Russia’s military buildup in Syria. That same day, traitorous Infowars published a report on September 18, 2015, entitled “Putin Sends Tanks to Syria: Largest Deployment of Outside Russian Forces Since USSR Collapse”, essentially confirming that Russia has invaded Syria. Also on September 18, 2015, it was reported that the Syrian Army is starting to use new weapons provided to them by Russia, confirming that a proxy war in Syria has already begun. Three days later on September 21, 2015, Russia reportedly began flying unmanned drones over Syria, and is sending more fighter jets to the region. A day later on September 22, 2015, the Wall Street Journal published a report entitled “Russia Expands Military Presence in Syria, Satellite Photos Show”, further corroborating the notion that Russia military involvement in Syria is escalating prior to the impending proxy war. Lastly, a day later on September 23, 2015, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry warned that the U.S. and Russia may clash in Syria, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that the CIA is indeed plotting a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia in Syria. Said proxy war will no doubt lead to a nuclear World War III.

Russian Sub

1.2: Russian Missile Strike
Since the CIA has thus far been unable to execute a Russian-based attack on the United States, they may resort to staging Russian-based WMD missile strikes on America. Said attack will most likely originate from a submarine within the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean. In what appears to be pre-Russian missile strike programing, it was reported back on June 16, 2015, that Russian President Putin stated that Russia will create 40 new intercontinental missiles this year, all of which are nuclear in nature. Roughly 2-months later on August 11, 2015, it was reported that the White House blocked a Pentagon report on a missile treaty that was breached by Russia. Considering that Russia allegedly violated the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, nuclear missile strikes by Russia may now be forthcoming. In order to highlight Russia and nuclear missiles just prior to a staged nuclear attack, it was reported on August 19, 2015, that the Russia has moved ahead with a missile sale to Iran. That same day, August 19, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force has test-launched an unarmed missile from California. The so-called missile test appears to be a beta-test for a Russian-based nuclear strike on California, most likely targeting Los Angeles and/or San Francisco. Lastly, that same day, August 19, 2015, it was also reported that the U.S. military has launched a second airship near Baltimore to test America’s missile defense system. Again, the missile defense test appears to be a beta-test for a Russian-based nuclear strike on east coast of America, most likely targeting New York City and/or Washington, D.C.

Putin Nuke Nuclear

1.3: Russian Nuclear Terror Attack
Exactly one month before the aforementioned book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) was published on December 21, 2014, Forbes published a report on November 21, 2014, entitled “Does Russia Think Their New Nuclear Weapons Could Win A War?”. This was the first-ever report identified by Truther.org which foreshadowed an unprecedented and unprovoked nuclear strike by Russia. Ever since revelations where made public that Switzerland harbors the CIA, the international media (which operates at the behest of the CIA) has been inundated with the Russian nuclear attack narrative. For example, it was reported back on March 15, 2015, that Vladimir Putin stated that Russia is preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary”. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin again threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Crimea in Ukraine. It is imperative to note that the latter two reports invoking Ukraine and a nuclear attack are key because aside from the United States, Ukraine is most likely NATO country to suffer a Russian nuclear strike. Roughly a month later on May 1, 2015, it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska, conforming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing a nuclear strike. Roughly 4-weeks later on May 27, 2015, a NATO general warned that Russian President Putin is a “dangerous gambler…willing to use nuclear weapons”, an apparent preview of things to come. The notion of a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia was foreshadowed in a Russia Today report from June 7, 2015, entitled “UK Could Host US Nukes to Counter Increased ‘Russian Activity’”, as well as a Telegraph report entitled “Nuclear Missiles Could be Sited Again on British Soil in New ‘Cold War’ with Russia”. In what appears to be an ominous sign of things to come, the Daily Star published a report on June 8, 2015, entitled “Armageddon Strikes: Massive Cloud Sparks Russian Nuclear Attack Panic”. A day later on June 9, 2015, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt was enacted by intelligence operative Mark Dice who created a petition to nuke Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “US and Russia ‘Playing Nuclear Chicken with Each Other’”, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that nuclear war between the two nations is imminent. A day later on June 12, 2015, it was reported that people in Moscow widely oppose the fake petition to nuke America, further raising the specter of nuclear war between the two countries. Five days later on June 17, 2015, Kremlin officials stated that Russia’s nuclear buildup is being forced by the West. Three days later on June 20, 2015, Putin stated that the world was no closer to Cold War-style nuclear standoff, raising the notion of a nuclear confrontation just prior to its fruition in reality. Three days later on June 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “The Pentagon Goes Nuclear on Russia” which stated that Russian submarines off the coast of America could engage in a “nuclear turkey shoot”, knocking out every major American city within a few minutes. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles which travel through space. Lastly, on June 25, 2015, Reuters published a report entitled “Russia ‘Playing with Fire’ with Nuclear Saber-Rattling”, further inferring that a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia is now in play by the CIA.

1.4: Russian Bio-Terror Attack
Although a Russian-based nuclear attack are the most likely scenario, there is also the chance that the Swiss CIA could spark a biological pandemic in Europe during the impending conflict between the U.S. and Russia. How this bio-terror pandemic will manifest is not yet known, but it has been foreshadowed in the news nonetheless. For example, on June 5, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Expert Predicts Anthrax Attacks Will Be Used to Push Russian War”, consummating the terms Anthrax and Russia within the same headlines. Ten days later on June 15, 2015, Infowars published another report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, stating that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. Needless to say, one of these bio-labs in Eastern Europe could be directly attacked or suffer collateral damage, leading to a biological outbreak that could spark the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015.

II. RUSSIAN INVASION OF ALASKA:

US Russia World War III

2.1: Russian Invasion of Alaska
Although a Russian-based attack could theoretically transpire anywhere along its vast borders (e.g., Poland, Sweden, Ukraine, etc.), breaking news suggest that the U.S. state of Alaska will suffer a Russian attack and subsequent invasion. Considering Alaska was purchased from Russia for only $7.2 million in 1867, an invasion to take it back is all but expected. The notion that the U.S. in concerned about the potential Russian invasion of Alaska was recently rehashed on September 1, 2014, by Telegraph report entitled “America’s Secret Plan to Stop Russian Invasion of Alaska Revealed” which highlighted the Operation Washtub. According to reports, Operation Washtub was a U.S. military program designed to recruit Alaskan fishermen, trappers and bush pilots as “stay-behind agents” to form a secret American resistance network if and when Russia staged a widely-feared invasion of the state. The notion that Russia is targeting Alaska was first identified on May 1, 2015, when it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska. The incident conforms, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing an attack on Alaska. Shortly thereafter in June of 2015, the U.S. war game exercise entitled Northern Edge 2015 was executed in Alaska. The drills reportedly involved more than 200 aircraft and 6,000 U.S. soldiers from all four branches of the military. The unprecedented drill appears to be the U.S. military’s planned response to the impending Russian invasion. In order to sell the notion that a Russian invasion is imminent, Russian bombers executed a flyby of Alaska on July 4, 2015. Considering that the incident was not reported until 3-weeks later, it can be deduced that the incident was fabricated by the CIA in order to foreshadow a Russia attack on Alaska. The notion that Russia is about to stage an invasion of the artic was foreshadowed in an August 8, 2015, report from Fox News entitled “Republicans Slam Obama Administration as Russia Tries Arctic Land Grab”. Considering that Alaska is in the artic, an invasion by Russia may be forthcoming. In order to foreshadow that native Alaskans will suddenly become Russia citizens, it was also reported on August 11, 2015, that visa-free travel to Russia will be reinstated for eligible Alaska Natives. The shocking development was designed to show that diplomatic relations with Russia are about to change in a major way. A day later on August 12, 2015, it was reported that Japanese paratroopers took part in landmark jump over Alaska. Needless to say, the timely report was designed to foreshadow an invasion of Alaska, most likely by Russian paratroopers. In what appears to be an ominous sign that a Russian invasion of the U.S. is imminent, it was reported on August 13, 2015, that Russia has moved a huge number of troops to its western border. The alleged move by Russia is an apparent fake to invade Europe while they secretly plot to invade Alaska. A day later on August 14, 2015, it was reported that a classified Pentagon exercises revealed that the U.S. would struggle to win a war with Russia. The timely report of the once classified exercise was designed to foreshadow the notion that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent. That same day, August 14, 2015, it was also reported that the American F-35 fighter is “inferior” to Russia’s Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter aircraft. Again, the timely report was designed to show that the U.S. is inferior to Russia just prior to the surprise attack and/or invasion of Alaska. A day later on August 15, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Radical Christians Raid Soviet Art Show in Moscow”. The timely report was designed to foreshadow a Russian “raid” just prior to the full-scale invasion of Alaska by Russia. In what appears to be pre-Russian attack politics, it was reported on August 16, 2015, that Russia is now squeezing critics at home by declaring them “foreign agents”. In other words, Putin is now cracking down on dissent just prior to an unprovoked attack on America, namely Alaska. In order to put Alaska in the international spotlight just prior to Russian invasion, it was reported on August 18, 2015, that the U.S. will now let Shell drill for oil off the coast of Alaska. Considering that Shell has been drilling in Alaska for years, it can be deduced that the report is a fabricated propaganda report. That same day, August 18, 2015, it was reported that an Alaska Village is now seeking to be reunited with their Russian relatives. Again, the timely report was designed to foreshadow that Alaska will be reunited with Russia post-Russian invasion. Lastly, on August 19, 2015, it was reported that 3 men are missing and presumed dead after several landslides in Alaska. The landslides were man-made in nature in order to put Alaska in the national media spotlight just prior to an attack.

III. RUSSIAN CYBER-ATTACK:

3.1: Russian Cyber-Scapegoat
In the aftermath of unprecedented cyber-related terror attacks on the travel industry, the Swiss CIA will may finger Russia. In order to create the narrative in the media that Russia is actively targeting America with cyber-related attacks, it was reported back on April 8, 2015, that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network, a fraudulent notion to be sure. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks, an apparent preview of things to come. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. Lastly, less than 2-weeks later on June 9, 2015, TV5 Monde was reportedly attacked ‘by Russia-based hackers’, setting the precedent the impending attack. Lastly, on September 16, 2015, it was reported that a Russian national plead guilty in a major corporate hack attack case, further selling the notion that Russia is targeting the west with cyber-attacks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that Russia will be scapegoated in the aftermath of an unprecedented cyber-terror attack targeting American and/or European airliners, likely leading to a new Cold War.

IV. RUSSIAN ATTACK ON UKRAINE:

Putin Crimea

4.1: Ukraine
Considering that Ukraine, a NATO nation, was already invaded by Russia during the crisis in Crimea, it’s the most likely country in Europe to suffer a Russian attack and secondary invasion. Based on recent news in respect to both Ukraine and nuclear warfare, a nuclear strike in Ukraine now appears to be in order. This particular narrative was first identified back on March 15, 2015, when Putin stated that Russia was preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary” while simultaneously blaming the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Ukraine. Roughly a month later on April 28, 2015, it was reported that forest fires were heading for Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine. Roughly a month later on June 5, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Kiev to Allow Foreign Armed Forces in Ukraine, incl. ‘Potential Carriers of Nukes’”. These 4 reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based nuclear strike on Ukraine is imminent. The nuclear attack will likely happen just prior to, during, or right after the U.S. led NATO invasion of Ukraine. In order to foreshadow further Russian aggression in Ukraine, CNN published a report on June 11, 2015, entitled “U.S. Ambassador to U.N. Visits Ukraine, Slams Russian ‘Aggression’”. Four days later on June 15, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, starting that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. In a clear sign that war in Ukraine is imminent, it was reported on June 18, 2015, that Iraq War criminal Tony Blair will take on an advisory role in Ukraine. Three days later on June 21, 2015, Ukraine’s Right Sector rejects the Minsk deal, calling for a renewed offensive in Ukraine. The notion that war is about to break out in Ukraine was confirmed on June 22, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S. will provide weapons for NATO commandos to attack Ukrainian separatists. That same day, June 22, 2015, it was also reported that a member of Kiev’s top brass ‘defects’ to anti-government forces. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the traitorous general will lead the opposition to Russia in the coming war. A day later on June 23, 2015, the Guardian published a report entitled “EU Extends Sanctions against Russia as Ukraine Conflict Rumbles On”. Although the conflict in Ukraine has been dormant for months, it apparently going to get a shot in the arm. Lastly, in what appears to be pre-nuclear terror programming for Ukraine, it was reported on August 6, 2015, that ISIS uranium smugglers were busted in special op in western Ukraine. In what appears to be pre-Russian attack on Ukraine programing, it was reported on August 22, 2015, that Ukrainian leader Poroshenko stated that the Minsk agreement allows for a Kiev military buildup. In other words, the CIA is plotting a new war between Ukraine and Russia, hence the military buildup. In what appears to be an ominous sign of Ukrainian terror to come, it was reported on August 31, 2015, that 1 person was killed and 100 injured in political clashes in Ukraine. The state-sponsored riots are a red flag that war in Ukraine is imminent. Lastly, on September 14, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “U.S.-Installed Ukrainian Regime Now Fears Return of Donbass to Ukraine”, further foreshadowing a proxy war between NATO-led U.S. and Russia in Ukraine. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based attack/invasion of Ukraine is imminent.

V. ALL THE WORLD IS A STAGE:

BIS (2)

5.1: US & Russia Funded by BIS in Switzerland
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland is the financial backbone of the CIA in Switzerland which secretly funds its black operations around the world. In short, the BIS funds 60 central banks which are collectively responsible for 95% of the world’s GDP, making it the sole progenitor of the world’s fiat money supply. These central banks include the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States which funds the U.S. government and her military, and the Bank of Russia which funds the Russian government and her military. Consequently, all monies allocated to the U.S. and Russia for World War III originated from the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland which, aside from Vatican City, is the only country to bear a sovereign flag. Consequently, the United States and Russia do not have sovereign flags, meaning that they are not in control of their own destiny nor their own respective militaries.

Obama Putin

5.2: Presidential Puppets Obama & Putin
Since both U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin are puppets of the CIA, they have no real power and only act when told to do so. In other words, neither of them is actually in charge; they are just political puppets posing for the cameras. However, in order to create the public perception that the beef between the U.S. and Russia is real, Obama reportedly urged G7 leaders to maintain the sanctions on Russia while simultaneously admitting that they don’t work. A day later on June 6, 2015, Putin reportedly stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. The premediated soundbite was given in order to create the perception that Putin is crazy, especially in the aftermath of unprovoked nuclear strikes against the U.S. and NATO. Lastly, it was reported on June 24, 2015, that Putin’s approval rating is at an historic high at 89%, inferring that virtually all of Russia supports his reckless policy. In the aftermath of a nuclear World War III, Putin will be blamed rather that the CIA who orchestrated the nuclear conflict to begin with.

VI. PRE-WORLD WAR III PROGRAMMING:

6.1: World War III Saber Rattling
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, saber rattling between the NATO nations and Russia is currently at an all-time high which suggests that a real world attack between the two nations is imminent. Aside from the fact that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska on May 1, 2015, Russia instituted a travel ban against EU officials on May 31, 2015. Less than a week later on June 5, 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military training and exercises to counter Russia. A day later on June 6, 2015, a government reported stated that the U.S. is now considering a harder stance on Russia, one that will predictably lead to war. Two days later on June 7, 2015, U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO, suggesting that an armed conflict is only a matter of time. Less than 48-hours later on June 9, 2015, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush called for a tougher policy toward Russia and Putin. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015, a top Russian security official reportedly stated that the “U.S. would like Russia to cease to exist as a country”, a declaration of war if there ever was one. Lastly, that same day, June 22, 2015, the Independent published a report entitled “Russia ‘Aggression’: US Nuclear Missile Commander says Vladimir Putin’s Actions Echo Those of Nazi Germany in the 1930s”, a report evidently designed to invoke a Russian attack and invasion that may be nuclear in nature. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

Russia

6.2: Motives for a Russian Attack
In order to create the necessary narrative in the media prior to unprovoked Russian nuclear strikes against NATO nations, a number of timely motives have been created by the Swiss CIA. For example, on May 31, 2015, it was reported that Russian President Putin was shut out from the G7 Meeting for the second year running. Less than 2-weeks later on June 10, 2015, the United States reportedly overtook Russia as the world’s top oil and gas producer. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. Roughly a week later on June 19, 2015, the EU Parliament voted to prolong economic sanctions against Crimea till June 2016. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, have given Russia at least 4 motives for an attack against NATO, one which may be nuclear in nature.

6.3: Russian Threats
Prior to a World War III between the U.S. and Russia, a number of threats must be leveled from both sides in order to give the perception that the conflict is real and not being orchestrated by the CIA in Switzerland. The first threat was identified on May 8, 2015, when it was reported that Russia intends to restore a spy base in Cuba, some 90 miles from American shores. That same day, May 8, 2015, Russian students projected a Russian-based tank attack on the White House, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to foreshadow a Russian attack on America. Roughly a month later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep. Since NATO is currently moving military equipment to its border with Russia, a Russian attack is forthcoming. Three days later on June 19, 2015, Russian President Putin stated that no one should talk to Russia through ultimatums, inferring that he will no longer be subjugated by the West. That same day, June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO, an off-handed threat to Ukraine which did in fact join NATO. Lastly, on June 23, 2015, a senior Russian diplomat stated that Russia will longer accept lectures from the United States. The timely comments were designed to show that Russia feels belittled by NATO and may lash out, possibly with nuclear strikes. Needless to say, these threats, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

PutinObama2013G20Summit640

6.4: Close Calls
Aside from the aforementioned World War III rhetoric and propaganda, there have been a number of close calls which have set the scene for a military showdown between the United States and Russia. One of these incidents could be misinterpreted (purposely of course) which could translate into a hot war between Russia and U.S. and NATO forces. The first close call between the U.S. and Russia was reported on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea. The incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia naval conflict in the Black Sea. This notion is confirmed by NATO war games ongoing in the Black Sea. A day later on June 1, 2015, it was reported that Russian and U.S. planes had a close encounter near Crimea, foreshadowing an aerial-related conflict between the two countries. Again, the incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia conflict in Ukraine. Nine days later on June 10, 2015, it was reported that a Russian jet reportedly harassed U.S. reconnaissance plane, otherwise known as a spy plane. According to reports, the Russian Su-27 fighters reportedly intercepted a US RC-135 intelligence aircraft on May 30, 2015. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a similar incident will lead to a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia.

World War III US & Russia

6.5: World War III Propaganda
Prior to World War III between the U.S. and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, U.S. versus Russia propaganda is now at an all-time high which suggests that a false-flag attack that triggers a nuclear World War III is imminent. This particular narrative was first identified by Truther.org back on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea, causing the Russian defense minister to state that the incident “pose[d] a danger to strategic stability” between the two countries. Roughly a week later on June 8, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Russia has Better Things To Do than Start WW3”, raising the notion of World War III involving Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations visited Ukraine, slamming Russian ‘aggression’. The timely comment foreshadows a Russian-based attack on Ukraine, one which may be nuclear in nature. Five days later on June 16, 2015, Russia herself warned of a “new military confrontation” in Europe, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia will be at war in Europe in the near future. A day later on June 17, 2015, CNN published a report entitled “U.S.-Russia Military Tit for Tat Raises Fears of Greater Conflict”, suggesting that a local U.S.-Russian conflict could translate into World War III. Lastly, on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III between the U.S. and Russia.

VII. WORLD WAR III ARMS BUILDUP:

Russia Putin

7.1: Russian Military Buildup
Prior to the start of World War III, Russia must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 15, 2015, when it was reported that Russia may beef up its border if U.S. military arms are stationed in Eastern Europe. Since U.S. arms are now flowing into NATO countries such as Poland, it can be assumed that Russia has made good on its promise. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was Russian President Putin stated that Russia will get 40 new nuclear intercontinental missiles this year, an ominous sign that nuclear war is imminent. Less than 24-hours later on June 17, 2015, it was reported that the Russian military is developing an anti-drone microwave gun. The timely propaganda report was designed to associate an aerial aircraft (drone) with radiation (microwave) just prior to nuclear airstrikes by Russia, most likely in America and/or Eastern Europe. Lastly, that same day, June 17, 2015, Russia showed off its news military equipment and vehicles at Army 2015 Expo near Moscow, a flexing of the Russian military muscle if you will. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

7.2: US & NATO Military Buildup

Prior to the start of World War III, NATO must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 4, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S, may deploy missiles in Europe to counter Russia. Ten days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now in talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe. That same day, June 14, 2015, it was reported that Poland and Lithuania discussing plans with the U.S. to harbor military equipment. Said talks became reality a day later on June 15, 2015, when the Pentagon reportedly sent heavy military equipment to Eastern Europe. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force may send F-22s to Europe over the “threat” from Russia. The massive military escalation in Eastern Europe was confirmed on June 18, 2015, when it was reported that NATO is conducting the biggest beef up of defenses since the Cold War. That same day, June 18, 2015, it was also reported that the Pentagon is now building a cruise missile shield to defend U.S. cities from Russia, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that U.S. cities will be attacked by Russian missiles, most likely nuclear in nature. Four days later on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive NATO arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III. The ongoing NATO buildup of weapons was confirmed yet again on June 5, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military aid to NATO to counter Russia. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015: Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide weapons, aircraft and commandos to NATO. A day later on June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. military is now moving tanks and other equipment to allied nations near the Russian border, including but not limited to: 250 military vehicles and Abrams tanks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

7.3: Black Sea Naval Buildup
In order to create the scene for a spectacular World War III battle between the U.S. and Russia, both sides must get their aircraft and ships in position prior an attack. Aside from the USS Taylor (FFG-50) and the USS Mount Whitney (LCC-20) which were originally stationed in the Black Sea during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, the U.S. has also sent the USS Truxtun to the Black Sea which is part of the USS George H.W. Bush strike group stationed in Mediterranean. On the Russian side, there are a total of 7 ships in the Black Sea. According to a March 5, 2014 report, two Russian warships have now entered the Black Sea through the Bosphorus en route to Crimea. The 150 ‘Saratov’ landing ship and the 156 ‘Yamal’ assault ship will reportedly join five other Russian naval ships which are currently stationed in the port city of Sevastopol which is adjacent to Crimea. These ships include the 30th Surface Ship Division, the 41st Missile Boat Brigade, the 247th Separate Submarine Division, the 68th Harbor Defense Ship, and the 422nd Separate Hydrographic Ship Division. In total, there are at least 11 ships in or near the Black Sea.

VIII. WORLD WAR III WAR GAMES:

putin-binoculars-AP

8.1: Russian War Games
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the Russian military must get their soldiers and equipment ready for battle. War games are in essence practice for war and they have been occurring at an alarming rate. The notion that Russia is actively training for an attack on NATO was first identified back on March 7, 2014, when the Pentagon confirmed that Russian is now conducting air defense drills that will conclude with live fire exercise. Two days later on March 9, 2015, it was reported that Russian jets are practicing “attack scenarios” on NATO ships, further foreshadowing a Russian-based attack, possibly nuclear in nature. Roughly a month later on April 30, 2015, it was reported that Russia and China will hold their first-ever joint naval drills in the Mediterranean in May 2015. Roughly a month later on May 25, 2015, it was reported that Russia launched a massive air force exercise with 250 aircraft, further foreshadowing the notion of a Russian-based aerial attack. Roughly 3-months later on August 11, 2015, it was reported that Iran and Russia held war games in which two Russian warships docked in Iran’s northern Anzali port. Whether these Russian ships will be used in a nuclear-related terror attack or invasion of the United States is not known, but it’s theoretically possible. Considering that war games have a tendency to go live, an armed conflict between NATO and Russia could commence at any time.

IX: WHEN RUSSIA ATTACKS
:

Putin Russia

9.1: Russian Attacks
In order to set the precedent for an unprecedented nuclear attack by Russia, a narrative has been created in the media by the Swiss CIA that Russia is responsible for a wave of cyber-attacks against the United States, setting the precedent for a far greater attack. This particular narrative was first identified back on January 18, 2014, when it was reported that Russia created the ‘BlackPOS Malware’ to hack Target and Neiman Marcus. Roughly 3-months later on April 8, 2015, it was reported that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. The notion of a Russia-based attack was foreshadowed by Russian President Putin on June 6, 2015, when he stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. Three days later on June 9, 2015, it was reported that the television station TV5 Monde was attack by Russia-based hackers. In the event that Russia launches nuclear strikes against NATO, the world’s TV stations will likely be simultaneously hijacked by a cyber-attack so that the world will collectively witness the nuclear detonation on live on TV. Lastly, on August 6, 2015, it was reported that Russia is “strongly suspected” of the latest cyberattack on the Pentagon.

Russia Putin ISIS

9.2: Russia Terror Attacks
In the last 2-years, at least 5 terror-related incidents (see below) have either been committed by Russian terrorists and/or the Russia government. Whether or not these Russian-based terror attacks will commence with a Russian terror attacks against NATO countries is not known, but it’s highly likely. Said attacks will likely transpire a few days prior to a full-scale nuclear attack by Russia. The notion that terror attacks are now in play for NATO was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, on June 22, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide commandos to NATO. Translation: Special Forces (i.e., professional terrorists) will be used to commit terror attacks in NATO countries (e.g., Lithuania, Poland, etc.). This notion that Russian-based terrorism is imminent was confirmed on June 5, 2015, when it was reported that a 19-year old Russian girl was an ISIS recruit. The girl was reportedly one 13 Russians who were on their way to join ISIS in Syria. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 17, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Pentagon Trained ISIS Unleashed on Russia”, associating Russia with ISIS just prior to state-sponsored Islamic terror attacks in NATO countries. That same day, June 17, 2015, Moscow reportedly launches an anti-ISIS training program for Russian imams, further associating Russia with ISIS just prior to Islamic terror attacks against NATO. Once a war between the U.S. and a Russia commences, it’s highly likely that the creation and funding of ISIS will be blamed on Russia, instead of the CIA in Switzerland where it belongs.

Russian Terror Timeline
:

1. April 15, 2013: Russian Brothers Tsarnaev Execute Boston Marathon Bombings (Boston, MA)
2. December 29, 2013: 14 Dead after Suicide Bombing at Russia Railway Station (Volgograd, Russia)
3. December 30, 2014: Second Suicide Bomber hits Russian City, 14 Killed (Volgograd, Russia)
4. January 25, 2014: Russian Teen Charged in US with Weapon of Mass Destruction (Altoona, PA)
5. August 8, 2015: Jury convicts Russian commander of terror-related charges (Richmond, VA)
6. August 12, 2015: US jury convicts Uzbek refugee of 3 terrorism-related charges (Boise, ID)
7. September 16, 2015: Russian national pleads guilty in major corporate hack attack (Camden, NJ)

[Does not purport to be a complete list of Russian-related terror attacks]

X. WORLD WAR III FLASHPOINTS:

10.1: Global Flashpoints
Whenever blood must be spilled by the CIA, disputed areas like Crimea (Eastern Europe), Jerusalem (Middle East), Kashmir (Central Asia) or the Senkaku Islands (Asia) are suddenly inflamed by the CIA through the television channels which they control outright. Consequently, politicians, soldiers and militaries equipment are moved like pawns in the global scheme run by the Swiss CIA. In respect to the impending World War III scenario between the U.S. and Russia, Truther.org has identified 4 flashpoints aside from Alaska, Syrian Ukraine that may suffer an attack, invasion or nuclear strike.

10.2: Poland
The notion that NATO and Russia are about to go to war was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO. Three days later on June 10, 2015, NATO started “very high readiness” war games in Poland, providing a timely motive for a Russian-based attack. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. The CIA-spawned hoax was a publicity stunt designed to provide another timely motive for a Russian-based attack on NATO. Three days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now win talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe, posing a direct threat to Russia. The notion of Russian tanks rolling into Poland was ominously foreshadowed on June 14, 2015, when the Sunday Times published a report entitled “German Tanks Roll Back into Poland”. Similar to the invasion of Crimea, the impending invasion of Poland will be used to sell the notion of a new Cold War between Russia and the West. In order to provide another blatant motive for a Russian attack on Poland, it was reported on June 14, 2015, that Poland has erected observation towers on its border with Russia. The red-and-white metal radio-tower-like structures are reportedly equipped with cameras, rising up to 164 feet. A day later on June 15, 2015, it was confirmed that the U.S. will store heavy weapons in Poland under NATO’s new plan, proving yet another motive for a Russian-based attack on Poland, Islamic terrorist or otherwise. Lastly, the notion that Russia is planning a retaliatory attack on NATO was all but confirmed on June 16, 2015, when it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep in Poland. Consequently, an Islamic and/or Russian based attack is expected.

10.3: Sweden
Aside from being an active participant in numerous NATO war games, Sweden borders Russia to the West and therefore is the most likely of the Western European countries to suffer a direct attack or invasion by Russia. Although a nuclear strike on Sweden is highly unlikely, a bio-terror attack is a far more realistic possibility, possibly sparking the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. The notion of a Sweden-based bio-terror attack was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when it was reported that migrant beggars in Sweden were attacked with acid. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO.

XI. WORLD WAR III ENDGAME:

henry-gruver-russian-invasion-of-america-last-days

11.1: World War III Endgame
In the wake of Russian nuclear attacks in Ukraine or elsewhere, a European Union-type of army will likely be formed to counter Russia. This particular notion was foreshadowed back on March 8, 2015, it was reported that the current President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, called for the creation of EU army. Russian nuclear attacks in Eastern Europe will also provide the Swiss government the political capital it needs to drastically change their current asylum and immigration laws, likely resulting in the immediate removal of all European Union citizens, whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor included. Draconian changes to Swiss asylum and immigration law will predictably result in Taylor’s deportation and subsequent assassination, which is exactly why the CIA in Switzerland is now targeting Europe with Russian nuclear strikes. The notion that Switzerland will deport foreigners was foreshadowed by The Local back on June 19, 2015, when they published a report entitled “Russian Crisis Threatens 40,000 Swiss Jobs”. In the United States, nuclear war will lead to martial law as well as the naked dictatorship of one Barack Hussein Obama. As dictator, Obama will execute Rex 84, a classified government scenario that features a military dictatorship in order to carry out the industrial slaughter of millions of Americans.

11.2: Nuclear Cold War
In the wake of Russian nuclear attack in Ukraine or elsewhere, Putin will predictably blame the U.S. and Obama will predictably blame Russia. This will of course escalate tensions between the two nations which will eventually lead to a new nuclear Cold War. A new and improved U.S. versus Russia feud is coincidentally the theme of the televisions show entitled “The Americans” (2013), as well as the new television mini-series entitled “The Assets” (see trailer) which premiered in the U.S. on January 2, 2014.

About the Author
David Chase Taylor is an American journalist and the editor-in-chief of Truther.org, a state-sponsored terror whistle-blower website. Taylor currently lives in Switzerland where he applied for political asylum on July 17, 2015. Taylor authored The Nuclear Bible, a book credited with foiling a nuclear terror attack upon Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011, and Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now, a book and website exposing the true power structure of the world, especially in respect to Greenland and its primary proxy state of Switzerland which is coincidentally home to the CIA. Taylor has also published The Bio-Terror Bible, a book and website exposing the global bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. To date, Taylor has blown the whistle on over 100 state-sponsored terror plots, including the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror Plot, the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the Terrorgate Scandal, the 2014 Memorial Day Massacre, the man-made asteroid attack planned for 2015, and the drone strike which killed “Fast and Furious” star Paul Walker. Taylor was also the first to expose Alex Jones’ treacherous links to STRATFOR and is noted for the 10 reasons why the Rosetta Comet landing was a hoax.

READ: World’s ‘Most Wanted’ Whistle-Blower Journalist David Chase Taylor Applies for Political Asylum in Switzerland

Truther.org Legal Disclaimer
Truther.org’s stated purpose is to stop terrorism by drawing unwanted global attention to terror plots prior to their fruition. Terror alerts and warnings made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility that they may occur based on breaking terror-related news, events and data. Historically speaking, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed, it is immediately canceled, postponed, or reworked (e.g., the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Freedom Tower Nuclear Terror Plot, etc.). State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats, create plausible deniability, and mislead the public from the usual suspects of terror which work at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland. Please support real citizen journalism and help make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste

0001 SAFDCT
customLogo.gif
truther-rss

Putin Russia

Download & Forward PDF

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor, officially applied for political asylum in Switzerland on July 17, 2015, the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called “natural disasters” I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, the Swiss CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in Switzerland, know this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland was harboring the CIA; and b) the CIA has historically not shat were it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland.

JADE HELM 15: CIA Plotting ISIS Invasion of America, Oak Keeper Massacres, Wave of Domestic/Jihad Terror Attacks, Predator Drone Strikes, Suspension of 2016 US Presidential Election, Martial Law & Obama Dictatorship

WORLD WAR III: CIA Plotting Russian-Based Nuclear Missile Strikes on America, Attack/Invasion of Alaska, Cyber- Attacks & Attack/Invasion of Ukraine

BUSTED: Alex Jones Flees America after Being Linked to Obama Plot to Spark a Civil War in Texas During JADE HELM 15

ISIS ENDGAME: How & Why the CIA Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks

BOOM: CIA Plotting Man-Made Asteroid Strike this September—JADE HELM States & Gulf of Mexico Most Likely to Suffer Attack

BREAKING: CERN Complex in Switzerland Identified as CIA Headquarters

SHOCK: Death Star Appears Over CERN, Switzerland, Home of the CIA

RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA

David Chase Taylor
September 15, 2015
Truther.org

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Ever since Truther.org revealed that the CIA in Switzerland created ISIS as political cover for nuclear and biological terror attacks, the Swiss CIA has been grooming Russia for a confrontation with the U.S. that will predictably lead to World War III.

In short, the 700-year cover of the CIA in Switzerland was officially blown for the first time in history by whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor in his shocking new book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) and therefore the Swiss CIA is beyond desperate to start World War III.

It is imperative to note that NATO, Russia, the United States and its two respective puppets named Putin and Obama are under the command and control of the CIA in Switzerland, all of which are indirectly funded by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland.

Exactly what type of Russian-based attack is planned is not known, but a Russian attack/invasion of Syria, a Russian nuclear missile strike on the U.S., a Russian invasion of Alaska, a Russian-based cyber-terror attack, and/or the Russian-based attack/invasion of Ukraine are the most likely Russian attack scenarios.

The notion that Russia is targeting the U.S. was first identified back on May 1, 2015, when it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska. The incident conforms, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing an attack on Alaska.

In order to sell the notion that a Russian invasion is imminent, Russian bombers executed a flyby of Alaska on July 4, 2015. Considering that the incident was not reported until 3-weeks later, it can be deduced that the incident was fabricated by the CIA in order to foreshadow a Russia attack on America.

In order to provide a timely motive for a Russian-based attack on the United States, it was reported on August 11, 2015, that the hit TV terror show “Homeland” will take on Russian President Vladimir Putin in season 5.

That same day, August 11, 2015, it was also reported that the White House blocked a Pentagon report on a missile treaty that was breached by Russia. Considering that Russia allegedly violated the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, a Russian nuclear missile strike on the U.S. may be forthcoming.

In what appears to be an ominous sign that a Russian invasion of the U.S. is imminent, it was reported on August 13, 2015, that Russia has moved a huge number of troops to its western border. The alleged move by Russia is an apparent fake to invade Europe while they secretly plot to invade the U.S. via Alaska.

A day later on August 14, 2015, it was reported that a classified Pentagon exercises revealed that the U.S. would struggle to win a war with Russia. The timely report of the once classified exercise was designed to foreshadow the notion that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent.

In what appears to be pre-Russian attack on Ukraine programing, it was reported on August 22, 2015, that Ukrainian leader Poroshenko stated that the Minsk agreement allows for a Kiev military buildup. In other words, the CIA is plotting a new war between Ukraine and Russia, hence the military buildup.

In what appears to be an ominous sign of Ukrainian terror to come, it was reported on August 31, 2015, that 1 person was killed and 100 injured in political clashes in Ukraine. The state-sponsored riots are a red flag that war in Ukraine is imminent.

Lastly, in what appears to be pre-Russian attack logistics, it was reported back on September 2, 2015, that Russia is executing its largest naval exercise yet. Whether the war game involves nuclear missile strike son the U.S. is not known, but it’s highly likely.

TOP RUSSIAN ATTACK SCENARIOS:

1. Russian Attack/Invasion of Syria
2.
Russian WMD Missile Strike
3. Russian Attack/Invasion of Alaska
4. Russian Cyber-Terror Attack
5. Russian Attack/Invasion of Ukraine and/or NATO country

I. RUSSIAN WMD MISSILE STRIKE:

1.1: Russian Attack/Invasion of Syria
Based on breaking news and events, it appears that the CIA in Switzerland is plotting a Russian-based attack/invasion of Syria. Said attack/invasion is designed to spark a larger proxy war between the U.S. and Russia in Syria. The Russian attack/invasion of Syria narrative was first identified back on September 8, 2015, when the New York Times published a report entitled “U.S. Moves to Block Russian Military Buildup in Syria”. Translation: Russia is plotting the full-scale invasion of Syria. Two days later on September 10, 2015, the U.S. reportedly warned Russia on its military buildup in Syria, giving Russia an ultimatum in respect to Syria. That same day, September 10, 2015, it was reported that Russian troops have joined the fight in Syria to “prop up” Assad. In other words, Russia is now publically backing Assad in Syria and therefore is diametrically opposed to the Syrian Rebels which are being funded by Obama to oust Assad. Four days later on September 14, 2015, it was reported that Russia is shipping tanks into Syria, the “first clear sign of offensive weapons” in Syria. Translation: a Russian offensive involving tanks in Syria appears imminent. That same day, September 14, 2015, the Pentagon reportedly stated that Russia is establishing a new military air base in Syria. Consequently, a full-scale aerial-based confrontation between the U.S. and Syria appears imminent. Lastly, in what appears to be the military drill for the Russian invasion of Syria, it was reported on September 14, 2015, that 95,000 Russian troops are now engaged in massive military drill entitled Centre-2015. Said military drill will likely go live in just a matter of time.

Russian Sub

1.2: Russian Missile Strike
Since the CIA has thus far been unable to execute a Russian-based attack on the United States, they may resort to staging Russian-based WMD missile strikes on America. Said attack will most likely originate from a submarine within the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean. In what appears to be pre-Russian missile strike programing, it was reported back on June 16, 2015, that Russian President Putin stated that Russia will create 40 new intercontinental missiles this year, all of which are nuclear in nature. Roughly 2-months later on August 11, 2015, it was reported that the White House blocked a Pentagon report on a missile treaty that was breached by Russia. Considering that Russia allegedly violated the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, nuclear missile strikes by Russia may now be forthcoming. In order to highlight Russia and nuclear missiles just prior to a staged nuclear attack, it was reported on August 19, 2015, that the Russia has moved ahead with a missile sale to Iran. That same day, August 19, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force has test-launched an unarmed missile from California. The so-called missile test appears to be a beta-test for a Russian-based nuclear strike on California, most likely targeting Los Angeles and/or San Francisco. Lastly, that same day, August 19, 2015, it was also reported that the U.S. military has launched a second airship near Baltimore to test America’s missile defense system. Again, the missile defense test appears to be a beta-test for a Russian-based nuclear strike on east coast of America, most likely targeting New York City and/or Washington, D.C.

Putin Nuke Nuclear

1.3: Russian Nuclear Terror Attack
Exactly one month before the aforementioned book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) was published on December 21, 2014, Forbes published a report on November 21, 2014, entitled “Does Russia Think Their New Nuclear Weapons Could Win A War?”. This was the first-ever report identified by Truther.org which foreshadowed an unprecedented and unprovoked nuclear strike by Russia. Ever since revelations where made public that Switzerland harbors the CIA, the international media (which operates at the behest of the CIA) has been inundated with the Russian nuclear attack narrative. For example, it was reported back on March 15, 2015, that Vladimir Putin stated that Russia is preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary”. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin again threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Crimea in Ukraine. It is imperative to note that the latter two reports invoking Ukraine and a nuclear attack are key because aside from the United States, Ukraine is most likely NATO country to suffer a Russian nuclear strike. Roughly a month later on May 1, 2015, it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska, conforming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing a nuclear strike. Roughly 4-weeks later on May 27, 2015, a NATO general warned that Russian President Putin is a “dangerous gambler…willing to use nuclear weapons”, an apparent preview of things to come. The notion of a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia was foreshadowed in a Russia Today report from June 7, 2015, entitled “UK Could Host US Nukes to Counter Increased ‘Russian Activity’”, as well as a Telegraph report entitled “Nuclear Missiles Could be Sited Again on British Soil in New ‘Cold War’ with Russia”. In what appears to be an ominous sign of things to come, the Daily Star published a report on June 8, 2015, entitled “Armageddon Strikes: Massive Cloud Sparks Russian Nuclear Attack Panic”. A day later on June 9, 2015, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt was enacted by intelligence operative Mark Dice who created a petition to nuke Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “US and Russia ‘Playing Nuclear Chicken with Each Other’”, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that nuclear war between the two nations is imminent. A day later on June 12, 2015, it was reported that people in Moscow widely oppose the fake petition to nuke America, further raising the specter of nuclear war between the two countries. Five days later on June 17, 2015, Kremlin officials stated that Russia’s nuclear buildup is being forced by the West. Three days later on June 20, 2015, Putin stated that the world was no closer to Cold War-style nuclear standoff, raising the notion of a nuclear confrontation just prior to its fruition in reality. Three days later on June 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “The Pentagon Goes Nuclear on Russia” which stated that Russian submarines off the coast of America could engage in a “nuclear turkey shoot”, knocking out every major American city within a few minutes. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles which travel through space. Lastly, on June 25, 2015, Reuters published a report entitled “Russia ‘Playing with Fire’ with Nuclear Saber-Rattling”, further inferring that a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia is now in play by the CIA.

1.4: Russian Bio-Terror Attack
Although a Russian-based nuclear attack are the most likely scenario, there is also the chance that the Swiss CIA could spark a biological pandemic in Europe during the impending conflict between the U.S. and Russia. How this bio-terror pandemic will manifest is not yet known, but it has been foreshadowed in the news nonetheless. For example, on June 5, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Expert Predicts Anthrax Attacks Will Be Used to Push Russian War”, consummating the terms Anthrax and Russia within the same headlines. Ten days later on June 15, 2015, Infowars published another report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, stating that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. Needless to say, one of these bio-labs in Eastern Europe could be directly attacked or suffer collateral damage, leading to a biological outbreak that could spark the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015.

II. RUSSIAN INVASION OF ALASKA:

US Russia World War III

2.1: Russian Invasion of Alaska
Although a Russian-based attack could theoretically transpire anywhere along its vast borders (e.g., Poland, Sweden, Ukraine, etc.), breaking news suggest that the U.S. state of Alaska will suffer a Russian attack and subsequent invasion. Considering Alaska was purchased from Russia for only $7.2 million in 1867, an invasion to take it back is all but expected. The notion that the U.S. in concerned about the potential Russian invasion of Alaska was recently rehashed on September 1, 2014, by Telegraph report entitled “America’s Secret Plan to Stop Russian Invasion of Alaska Revealed” which highlighted the Operation Washtub. According to reports, Operation Washtub was a U.S. military program designed to recruit Alaskan fishermen, trappers and bush pilots as “stay-behind agents” to form a secret American resistance network if and when Russia staged a widely-feared invasion of the state. The notion that Russia is targeting Alaska was first identified on May 1, 2015, when it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska. The incident conforms, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing an attack on Alaska. Shortly thereafter in June of 2015, the U.S. war game exercise entitled Northern Edge 2015 was executed in Alaska. The drills reportedly involved more than 200 aircraft and 6,000 U.S. soldiers from all four branches of the military. The unprecedented drill appears to be the U.S. military’s planned response to the impending Russian invasion. In order to sell the notion that a Russian invasion is imminent, Russian bombers executed a flyby of Alaska on July 4, 2015. Considering that the incident was not reported until 3-weeks later, it can be deduced that the incident was fabricated by the CIA in order to foreshadow a Russia attack on Alaska. The notion that Russia is about to stage an invasion of the artic was foreshadowed in an August 8, 2015, report from Fox News entitled “Republicans Slam Obama Administration as Russia Tries Arctic Land Grab”. Considering that Alaska is in the artic, an invasion by Russia may be forthcoming. In order to foreshadow that native Alaskans will suddenly become Russia citizens, it was also reported on August 11, 2015, that visa-free travel to Russia will be reinstated for eligible Alaska Natives. The shocking development was designed to show that diplomatic relations with Russia are about to change in a major way. A day later on August 12, 2015, it was reported that Japanese paratroopers took part in landmark jump over Alaska. Needless to say, the timely report was designed to foreshadow an invasion of Alaska, most likely by Russian paratroopers. In what appears to be an ominous sign that a Russian invasion of the U.S. is imminent, it was reported on August 13, 2015, that Russia has moved a huge number of troops to its western border. The alleged move by Russia is an apparent fake to invade Europe while they secretly plot to invade Alaska. A day later on August 14, 2015, it was reported that a classified Pentagon exercises revealed that the U.S. would struggle to win a war with Russia. The timely report of the once classified exercise was designed to foreshadow the notion that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent. That same day, August 14, 2015, it was also reported that the American F-35 fighter is “inferior” to Russia’s Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter aircraft. Again, the timely report was designed to show that the U.S. is inferior to Russia just prior to the surprise attack and/or invasion of Alaska. A day later on August 15, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Radical Christians Raid Soviet Art Show in Moscow”. The timely report was designed to foreshadow a Russian “raid” just prior to the full-scale invasion of Alaska by Russia. In what appears to be pre-Russian attack politics, it was reported on August 16, 2015, that Russia is now squeezing critics at home by declaring them “foreign agents”. In other words, Putin is now cracking down on dissent just prior to an unprovoked attack on America, namely Alaska. In order to put Alaska in the international spotlight just prior to Russian invasion, it was reported on August 18, 2015, that the U.S. will now let Shell drill for oil off the coast of Alaska. Considering that Shell has been drilling in Alaska for years, it can be deduced that the report is a fabricated propaganda report. That same day, August 18, 2015, it was reported that an Alaska Village is now seeking to be reunited with their Russian relatives. Again, the timely report was designed to foreshadow that Alaska will be reunited with Russia post-Russian invasion. Lastly, on August 19, 2015, it was reported that 3 men are missing and presumed dead after several landslides in Alaska. The landslides were man-made in nature in order to put Alaska in the national media spotlight just prior to an attack.

III. RUSSIAN CYBER-ATTACK:

3.1: Russian Cyber-Scapegoat
In the aftermath of unprecedented cyber-related terror attacks on the travel industry, the Swiss CIA will may finger Russia. In order to create the narrative in the media that Russia is actively targeting America with cyber-related attacks, it was reported back on April 8, 2015, that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network, a fraudulent notion to be sure. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks, an apparent preview of things to come. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. Lastly, less than 2-weeks later on June 9, 2015, TV5 Monde was reportedly attacked ‘by Russia-based hackers’, setting the precedent the impending attack. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that Russia will be scapegoated in the aftermath of an unprecedented cyber-terror attack targeting American and/or European airliners, likely leading to a new Cold War.

IV. RUSSIAN ATTACK ON UKRAINE:

Putin Crimea

4.1: Ukraine
Considering that Ukraine, a NATO nation, was already invaded by Russia during the crisis in Crimea, it’s the most likely country in Europe to suffer a Russian attack and secondary invasion. Based on recent news in respect to both Ukraine and nuclear warfare, a nuclear strike in Ukraine now appears to be in order. This particular narrative was first identified back on March 15, 2015, when Putin stated that Russia was preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary” while simultaneously blaming the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Ukraine. Roughly a month later on April 28, 2015, it was reported that forest fires were heading for Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine. Roughly a month later on June 5, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Kiev to Allow Foreign Armed Forces in Ukraine, incl. ‘Potential Carriers of Nukes’”. These 4 reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based nuclear strike on Ukraine is imminent. The nuclear attack will likely happen just prior to, during, or right after the U.S. led NATO invasion of Ukraine. In order to foreshadow further Russian aggression in Ukraine, CNN published a report on June 11, 2015, entitled “U.S. Ambassador to U.N. Visits Ukraine, Slams Russian ‘Aggression’”. Four days later on June 15, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, starting that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. In a clear sign that war in Ukraine is imminent, it was reported on June 18, 2015, that Iraq War criminal Tony Blair will take on an advisory role in Ukraine. Three days later on June 21, 2015, Ukraine’s Right Sector rejects the Minsk deal, calling for a renewed offensive in Ukraine. The notion that war is about to break out in Ukraine was confirmed on June 22, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S. will provide weapons for NATO commandos to attack Ukrainian separatists. That same day, June 22, 2015, it was also reported that a member of Kiev’s top brass ‘defects’ to anti-government forces. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the traitorous general will lead the opposition to Russia in the coming war. A day later on June 23, 2015, the Guardian published a report entitled “EU Extends Sanctions against Russia as Ukraine Conflict Rumbles On”. Although the conflict in Ukraine has been dormant for months, it apparently going to get a shot in the arm. Lastly, in what appears to be pre-nuclear terror programming for Ukraine, it was reported on August 6, 2015, that ISIS uranium smugglers were busted in special op in western Ukraine. In what appears to be pre-Russian attack on Ukraine programing, it was reported on August 22, 2015, that Ukrainian leader Poroshenko stated that the Minsk agreement allows for a Kiev military buildup. In other words, the CIA is plotting a new war between Ukraine and Russia, hence the military buildup. In what appears to be an ominous sign of Ukrainian terror to come, it was reported on August 31, 2015, that 1 person was killed and 100 injured in political clashes in Ukraine. The state-sponsored riots are a red flag that war in Ukraine is imminent. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based attack/invasion of Ukraine is imminent.

V. ALL THE WORLD IS A STAGE:

BIS (2)

5.1: US & Russia Funded by BIS in Switzerland
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland is the financial backbone of the CIA in Switzerland which secretly funds its black operations around the world. In short, the BIS funds 60 central banks which are collectively responsible for 95% of the world’s GDP, making it the sole progenitor of the world’s fiat money supply. These central banks include the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States which funds the U.S. government and her military, and the Bank of Russia which funds the Russian government and her military. Consequently, all monies allocated to the U.S. and Russia for World War III originated from the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland which, aside from Vatican City, is the only country to bear a sovereign flag. Consequently, the United States and Russia do not have sovereign flags, meaning that they are not in control of their own destiny nor their own respective militaries.

Obama Putin

5.2: Presidential Puppets Obama & Putin
Since both U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin are puppets of the CIA, they have no real power and only act when told to do so. In other words, neither of them is actually in charge; they are just political puppets posing for the cameras. However, in order to create the public perception that the beef between the U.S. and Russia is real, Obama reportedly urged G7 leaders to maintain the sanctions on Russia while simultaneously admitting that they don’t work. A day later on June 6, 2015, Putin reportedly stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. The premediated soundbite was given in order to create the perception that Putin is crazy, especially in the aftermath of unprovoked nuclear strikes against the U.S. and NATO. Lastly, it was reported on June 24, 2015, that Putin’s approval rating is at an historic high at 89%, inferring that virtually all of Russia supports his reckless policy. In the aftermath of a nuclear World War III, Putin will be blamed rather that the CIA who orchestrated the nuclear conflict to begin with.

VI. PRE-WORLD WAR III PROGRAMMING:

6.1: World War III Saber Rattling
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, saber rattling between the NATO nations and Russia is currently at an all-time high which suggests that a real world attack between the two nations is imminent. Aside from the fact that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska on May 1, 2015, Russia instituted a travel ban against EU officials on May 31, 2015. Less than a week later on June 5, 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military training and exercises to counter Russia. A day later on June 6, 2015, a government reported stated that the U.S. is now considering a harder stance on Russia, one that will predictably lead to war. Two days later on June 7, 2015, U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO, suggesting that an armed conflict is only a matter of time. Less than 48-hours later on June 9, 2015, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush called for a tougher policy toward Russia and Putin. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015, a top Russian security official reportedly stated that the “U.S. would like Russia to cease to exist as a country”, a declaration of war if there ever was one. Lastly, that same day, June 22, 2015, the Independent published a report entitled “Russia ‘Aggression’: US Nuclear Missile Commander says Vladimir Putin’s Actions Echo Those of Nazi Germany in the 1930s”, a report evidently designed to invoke a Russian attack and invasion that may be nuclear in nature. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

Russia

6.2: Motives for a Russian Attack
In order to create the necessary narrative in the media prior to unprovoked Russian nuclear strikes against NATO nations, a number of timely motives have been created by the Swiss CIA. For example, on May 31, 2015, it was reported that Russian President Putin was shut out from the G7 Meeting for the second year running. Less than 2-weeks later on June 10, 2015, the United States reportedly overtook Russia as the world’s top oil and gas producer. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. Roughly a week later on June 19, 2015, the EU Parliament voted to prolong economic sanctions against Crimea till June 2016. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, have given Russia at least 4 motives for an attack against NATO, one which may be nuclear in nature.

6.3: Russian Threats
Prior to a World War III between the U.S. and Russia, a number of threats must be leveled from both sides in order to give the perception that the conflict is real and not being orchestrated by the CIA in Switzerland. The first threat was identified on May 8, 2015, when it was reported that Russia intends to restore a spy base in Cuba, some 90 miles from American shores. That same day, May 8, 2015, Russian students projected a Russian-based tank attack on the White House, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to foreshadow a Russian attack on America. Roughly a month later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep. Since NATO is currently moving military equipment to its border with Russia, a Russian attack is forthcoming. Three days later on June 19, 2015, Russian President Putin stated that no one should talk to Russia through ultimatums, inferring that he will no longer be subjugated by the West. That same day, June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO, an off-handed threat to Ukraine which did in fact join NATO. Lastly, on June 23, 2015, a senior Russian diplomat stated that Russia will longer accept lectures from the United States. The timely comments were designed to show that Russia feels belittled by NATO and may lash out, possibly with nuclear strikes. Needless to say, these threats, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

PutinObama2013G20Summit640

6.4: Close Calls
Aside from the aforementioned World War III rhetoric and propaganda, there have been a number of close calls which have set the scene for a military showdown between the United States and Russia. One of these incidents could be misinterpreted (purposely of course) which could translate into a hot war between Russia and U.S. and NATO forces. The first close call between the U.S. and Russia was reported on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea. The incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia naval conflict in the Black Sea. This notion is confirmed by NATO war games ongoing in the Black Sea. A day later on June 1, 2015, it was reported that Russian and U.S. planes had a close encounter near Crimea, foreshadowing an aerial-related conflict between the two countries. Again, the incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia conflict in Ukraine. Nine days later on June 10, 2015, it was reported that a Russian jet reportedly harassed U.S. reconnaissance plane, otherwise known as a spy plane. According to reports, the Russian Su-27 fighters reportedly intercepted a US RC-135 intelligence aircraft on May 30, 2015. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a similar incident will lead to a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia.

World War III US & Russia

6.5: World War III Propaganda
Prior to World War III between the U.S. and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, U.S. versus Russia propaganda is now at an all-time high which suggests that a false-flag attack that triggers a nuclear World War III is imminent. This particular narrative was first identified by Truther.org back on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea, causing the Russian defense minister to state that the incident “pose[d] a danger to strategic stability” between the two countries. Roughly a week later on June 8, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Russia has Better Things To Do than Start WW3”, raising the notion of World War III involving Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations visited Ukraine, slamming Russian ‘aggression’. The timely comment foreshadows a Russian-based attack on Ukraine, one which may be nuclear in nature. Five days later on June 16, 2015, Russia herself warned of a “new military confrontation” in Europe, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia will be at war in Europe in the near future. A day later on June 17, 2015, CNN published a report entitled “U.S.-Russia Military Tit for Tat Raises Fears of Greater Conflict”, suggesting that a local U.S.-Russian conflict could translate into World War III. Lastly, on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III between the U.S. and Russia.

VII. WORLD WAR III ARMS BUILDUP:

Russia Putin

7.1: Russian Military Buildup
Prior to the start of World War III, Russia must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 15, 2015, when it was reported that Russia may beef up its border if U.S. military arms are stationed in Eastern Europe. Since U.S. arms are now flowing into NATO countries such as Poland, it can be assumed that Russia has made good on its promise. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was Russian President Putin stated that Russia will get 40 new nuclear intercontinental missiles this year, an ominous sign that nuclear war is imminent. Less than 24-hours later on June 17, 2015, it was reported that the Russian military is developing an anti-drone microwave gun. The timely propaganda report was designed to associate an aerial aircraft (drone) with radiation (microwave) just prior to nuclear airstrikes by Russia, most likely in America and/or Eastern Europe. Lastly, that same day, June 17, 2015, Russia showed off its news military equipment and vehicles at Army 2015 Expo near Moscow, a flexing of the Russian military muscle if you will. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

7.2: US & NATO Military Buildup

Prior to the start of World War III, NATO must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 4, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S, may deploy missiles in Europe to counter Russia. Ten days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now in talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe. That same day, June 14, 2015, it was reported that Poland and Lithuania discussing plans with the U.S. to harbor military equipment. Said talks became reality a day later on June 15, 2015, when the Pentagon reportedly sent heavy military equipment to Eastern Europe. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force may send F-22s to Europe over the “threat” from Russia. The massive military escalation in Eastern Europe was confirmed on June 18, 2015, when it was reported that NATO is conducting the biggest beef up of defenses since the Cold War. That same day, June 18, 2015, it was also reported that the Pentagon is now building a cruise missile shield to defend U.S. cities from Russia, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that U.S. cities will be attacked by Russian missiles, most likely nuclear in nature. Four days later on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive NATO arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III. The ongoing NATO buildup of weapons was confirmed yet again on June 5, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military aid to NATO to counter Russia. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015: Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide weapons, aircraft and commandos to NATO. A day later on June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. military is now moving tanks and other equipment to allied nations near the Russian border, including but not limited to: 250 military vehicles and Abrams tanks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

7.3: Black Sea Naval Buildup
In order to create the scene for a spectacular World War III battle between the U.S. and Russia, both sides must get their aircraft and ships in position prior an attack. Aside from the USS Taylor (FFG-50) and the USS Mount Whitney (LCC-20) which were originally stationed in the Black Sea during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, the U.S. has also sent the USS Truxtun to the Black Sea which is part of the USS George H.W. Bush strike group stationed in Mediterranean. On the Russian side, there are a total of 7 ships in the Black Sea. According to a March 5, 2014 report, two Russian warships have now entered the Black Sea through the Bosphorus en route to Crimea. The 150 ‘Saratov’ landing ship and the 156 ‘Yamal’ assault ship will reportedly join five other Russian naval ships which are currently stationed in the port city of Sevastopol which is adjacent to Crimea. These ships include the 30th Surface Ship Division, the 41st Missile Boat Brigade, the 247th Separate Submarine Division, the 68th Harbor Defense Ship, and the 422nd Separate Hydrographic Ship Division. In total, there are at least 11 ships in or near the Black Sea.

VIII. WORLD WAR III WAR GAMES:

putin-binoculars-AP

8.1: Russian War Games
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the Russian military must get their soldiers and equipment ready for battle. War games are in essence practice for war and they have been occurring at an alarming rate. The notion that Russia is actively training for an attack on NATO was first identified back on March 7, 2014, when the Pentagon confirmed that Russian is now conducting air defense drills that will conclude with live fire exercise. Two days later on March 9, 2015, it was reported that Russian jets are practicing “attack scenarios” on NATO ships, further foreshadowing a Russian-based attack, possibly nuclear in nature. Roughly a month later on April 30, 2015, it was reported that Russia and China will hold their first-ever joint naval drills in the Mediterranean in May 2015. Roughly a month later on May 25, 2015, it was reported that Russia launched a massive air force exercise with 250 aircraft, further foreshadowing the notion of a Russian-based aerial attack. Roughly 3-months later on August 11, 2015, it was reported that Iran and Russia held war games in which two Russian warships docked in Iran’s northern Anzali port. Whether these Russian ships will be used in a nuclear-related terror attack or invasion of the United States is not known, but it’s theoretically possible. Considering that war games have a tendency to go live, an armed conflict between NATO and Russia could commence at any time.

IX: WHEN RUSSIA ATTACKS
:

Putin Russia

9.1: Russian Attacks
In order to set the precedent for an unprecedented nuclear attack by Russia, a narrative has been created in the media by the Swiss CIA that Russia is responsible for a wave of cyber-attacks against the United States, setting the precedent for a far greater attack. This particular narrative was first identified back on January 18, 2014, when it was reported that Russia created the ‘BlackPOS Malware’ to hack Target and Neiman Marcus. Roughly 3-months later on April 8, 2015, it was reported that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. The notion of a Russia-based attack was foreshadowed by Russian President Putin on June 6, 2015, when he stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. Three days later on June 9, 2015, it was reported that the television station TV5 Monde was attack by Russia-based hackers. In the event that Russia launches nuclear strikes against NATO, the world’s TV stations will likely be simultaneously hijacked by a cyber-attack so that the world will collectively witness the nuclear detonation on live on TV. Lastly, on August 6, 2015, it was reported that Russia is “strongly suspected” of the latest cyberattack on the Pentagon.

Russia Putin ISIS

9.2: Russia Terror Attacks
In the last 2-years, at least 5 terror-related incidents (see below) have either been committed by Russian terrorists and/or the Russia government. Whether or not these Russian-based terror attacks will commence with a Russian terror attacks against NATO countries is not known, but it’s highly likely. Said attacks will likely transpire a few days prior to a full-scale nuclear attack by Russia. The notion that terror attacks are now in play for NATO was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, on June 22, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide commandos to NATO. Translation: Special Forces (i.e., professional terrorists) will be used to commit terror attacks in NATO countries (e.g., Lithuania, Poland, etc.). This notion that Russian-based terrorism is imminent was confirmed on June 5, 2015, when it was reported that a 19-year old Russian girl was an ISIS recruit. The girl was reportedly one 13 Russians who were on their way to join ISIS in Syria. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 17, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Pentagon Trained ISIS Unleashed on Russia”, associating Russia with ISIS just prior to state-sponsored Islamic terror attacks in NATO countries. That same day, June 17, 2015, Moscow reportedly launches an anti-ISIS training program for Russian imams, further associating Russia with ISIS just prior to Islamic terror attacks against NATO. Once a war between the U.S. and a Russia commences, it’s highly likely that the creation and funding of ISIS will be blamed on Russia, instead of the CIA in Switzerland where it belongs.

Russian Terror Timeline
:

1. April 15, 2013: Russian Brothers Tsarnaev Execute Boston Marathon Bombings (Boston, MA)
2. December 29, 2013: 14 Dead after Suicide Bombing at Russia Railway Station (Volgograd, Russia)
3. December 30, 2014: Second Suicide Bomber hits Russian City, 14 Killed (Volgograd, Russia)
4. January 25, 2014: Russian Teen Charged in US with Weapon of Mass Destruction (Altoona, PA)
5. August 8, 2015: Jury convicts Russian commander of terror-related charges (Richmond, VA)
6. August 12, 2015: US jury convicts Uzbek refugee of 3 terrorism-related charges (Boise, ID)

[Does not purport to be a complete list of Russian-related terror attacks]

X. WORLD WAR III FLASHPOINTS:

10.1: Global Flashpoints
Whenever blood must be spilled by the CIA, disputed areas like Crimea (Eastern Europe), Jerusalem (Middle East), Kashmir (Central Asia) or the Senkaku Islands (Asia) are suddenly inflamed by the CIA through the television channels which they control outright. Consequently, politicians, soldiers and militaries equipment are moved like pawns in the global scheme run by the Swiss CIA. In respect to the impending World War III scenario between the U.S. and Russia, Truther.org has identified 4 flashpoints aside from Alaska and Ukraine that may suffer an attack, invasion or nuclear strike.

10.2: Poland
The notion that NATO and Russia are about to go to war was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO. Three days later on June 10, 2015, NATO started “very high readiness” war games in Poland, providing a timely motive for a Russian-based attack. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. The CIA-spawned hoax was a publicity stunt designed to provide another timely motive for a Russian-based attack on NATO. Three days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now win talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe, posing a direct threat to Russia. The notion of Russian tanks rolling into Poland was ominously foreshadowed on June 14, 2015, when the Sunday Times published a report entitled “German Tanks Roll Back into Poland”. Similar to the invasion of Crimea, the impending invasion of Poland will be used to sell the notion of a new Cold War between Russia and the West. In order to provide another blatant motive for a Russian attack on Poland, it was reported on June 14, 2015, that Poland has erected observation towers on its border with Russia. The red-and-white metal radio-tower-like structures are reportedly equipped with cameras, rising up to 164 feet. A day later on June 15, 2015, it was confirmed that the U.S. will store heavy weapons in Poland under NATO’s new plan, proving yet another motive for a Russian-based attack on Poland, Islamic terrorist or otherwise. Lastly, the notion that Russia is planning a retaliatory attack on NATO was all but confirmed on June 16, 2015, when it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep in Poland. Consequently, an Islamic and/or Russian based attack is expected.

10.3: Sweden
Aside from being an active participant in numerous NATO war games, Sweden borders Russia to the West and therefore is the most likely of the Western European countries to suffer a direct attack or invasion by Russia. Although a nuclear strike on Sweden is highly unlikely, a bio-terror attack is a far more realistic possibility, possibly sparking the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. The notion of a Sweden-based bio-terror attack was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when it was reported that migrant beggars in Sweden were attacked with acid. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO.

XI. WORLD WAR III ENDGAME:

henry-gruver-russian-invasion-of-america-last-days

11.1: World War III Endgame
In the wake of Russian nuclear attacks in Ukraine or elsewhere, a European Union-type of army will likely be formed to counter Russia. This particular notion was foreshadowed back on March 8, 2015, it was reported that the current President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, called for the creation of EU army. Russian nuclear attacks in Eastern Europe will also provide the Swiss government the political capital it needs to drastically change their current asylum and immigration laws, likely resulting in the immediate removal of all European Union citizens, whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor included. Draconian changes to Swiss asylum and immigration law will predictably result in Taylor’s deportation and subsequent assassination, which is exactly why the CIA in Switzerland is now targeting Europe with Russian nuclear strikes. The notion that Switzerland will deport foreigners was foreshadowed by The Local back on June 19, 2015, when they published a report entitled “Russian Crisis Threatens 40,000 Swiss Jobs”. In the United States, nuclear war will lead to martial law as well as the naked dictatorship of one Barack Hussein Obama. As dictator, Obama will execute Rex 84, a classified government scenario that features a military dictatorship in order to carry out the industrial slaughter of millions of Americans.

11.2: Nuclear Cold War
In the wake of Russian nuclear attack in Ukraine or elsewhere, Putin will predictably blame the U.S. and Obama will predictably blame Russia. This will of course escalate tensions between the two nations which will eventually lead to a new nuclear Cold War. A new and improved U.S. versus Russia feud is coincidentally the theme of the televisions show entitled “The Americans” (2013), as well as the new television mini-series entitled “The Assets” (see trailer) which premiered in the U.S. on January 2, 2014.

About the Author
David Chase Taylor is an American journalist and the editor-in-chief of Truther.org, a state-sponsored terror whistle-blower website. Taylor currently lives in Switzerland where he applied for political asylum on July 17, 2015. Taylor authored The Nuclear Bible, a book credited with foiling a nuclear terror attack upon Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011, and Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now, a book and website exposing the true power structure of the world, especially in respect to Greenland and its primary proxy state of Switzerland which is coincidentally home to the CIA. Taylor has also published The Bio-Terror Bible, a book and website exposing the global bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. To date, Taylor has blown the whistle on over 100 state-sponsored terror plots, including the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror Plot, the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the Terrorgate Scandal, the 2014 Memorial Day Massacre, the man-made asteroid attack planned for 2015, and the drone strike which killed “Fast and Furious” star Paul Walker. Taylor was also the first to expose Alex Jones’ treacherous links to STRATFOR and is noted for the 10 reasons why the Rosetta Comet landing was a hoax.

READ: World’s ‘Most Wanted’ Whistle-Blower Journalist David Chase Taylor Applies for Political Asylum in Switzerland

Truther.org Legal Disclaimer
Truther.org’s stated purpose is to stop terrorism by drawing unwanted global attention to terror plots prior to their fruition. Terror alerts and warnings made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility that they may occur based on breaking terror-related news, events and data. Historically speaking, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed, it is immediately canceled, postponed, or reworked (e.g., the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Freedom Tower Nuclear Terror Plot, etc.). State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats, create plausible deniability, and mislead the public from the usual suspects of terror which work at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland. Please support real citizen journalism and help make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste

0001 SAFDCT
customLogo.gif
truther-rss

China pearl harbor

TRUTHER.ORG — “Peace by Revelation”

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor officially applied for political asylum in Switzerland on July 17, 2015, the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called “natural disasters” I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, the Swiss CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in Switzerland, know this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland was harboring the CIA; and b) the CIA has historically not shat were it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland.

JADE HELM 15: CIA Plotting ISIS Invasion of America, Oak Keeper Massacres, Wave of Domestic/Jihad Terror Attacks, Predator Drone Strikes, Suspension of 2016 US Presidential Election, Martial Law & Obama Dictatorship

BUSTED: Alex Jones Flees America after Being Linked to Obama Plot to Spark a Civil War in Texas During JADE HELM 15

WORLD WAR III: CIA Plotting War III between US & Russia—Staged Russian Invasion of Alaska Imminent

ISIS ENDGAME: How & Why the CIA Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks

BREAKING: CERN Complex in Switzerland Identified as CIA Headquarters

SHOCK: Death Star Appears Over CERN, Switzerland, Home of the CIA

RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA

David Chase Taylor
September 3, 2015
Truther.org

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Based on breaking news and events, it appears the CIA in Switzerland is preparing to stage a surprise Chinese attack and/or nuclear detonation, most likely targeting the countries of Australia, Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines and/or the United States.

The impending Chinese attack will most likely involve one or more of the following: a) a cyber-related attack targeting the U.S. financial system; b) a conventional nuclear attack; c) a TV-related cyber-hijack and subsequent nuclear attack; d) an EMP attack; and/or e) the full-scale Chinese invasion of Australia Hawaii, Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines and/or mainland United States.

That being said, the most likely Chinese attack scenario is the full-scale Chinese attack/invasion of Hawaii, a drone-related cyber-hijack and attack on the West Coast of America (e.g., Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, etc.) followed by a full-scale nuclear attack on Las Vegas and/or Los Angeles.

As previously reported, the Swiss CIA is desperately trying to trigger World War III between the United States and China. To date, at least 13 different of Chinese “surprise” attack plots have been identified and exposed by Truther.org, this being the latest.

In the wake of said Chinese attack plots, roughly 60 Chinese officials suddenly died due to unnatural causes. Although only conjecture, it appears that these Chinese officials were executed due to their first-hand knowledge of the aforementioned foiled war plots. After all, dead men tell no tales.

The notion that the Chinese are plotting a nuclear attack on Los Angeles was openly flaunted back on October 31, 2013, when the Chinese government released nuclear blast map projections for the American cities of Los Angeles and Seattle after they were hit by nuclear warheads from China.

In what appears to be pre-Chinese attack/invasion of Taiwan programming, it was reported on August 6, 2015, that Beijing has warned Taiwan against a return to “evil ways” of independence. Translation: a surprise Chinese attack on Taiwan is likely forthcoming, making the island dependent.

Four days later on August 10, 2015, Yahoo new published a report entitled “Aerial Assault Drone is Armed with Hacking Weapons”. The timely report was evidently designed to raise the specter of a drone-related hack and attack just prior to it transpiring in reality.

Four days later on August 14, 2015, the Financial Times published a report entitled “Chinese Launch Floating Fortress Project”. The timely report was evidently designed to foreshadow a Chinese naval attack, most likely against Taiwan and/or the United States.

That same day, August 14, 2015, it was reported that the NSA has now pinpointed China’s cyberattacks, citing a secret NSA document which revealed the “massive nature of China’s cyberattacks against the United States, with nearly 700 intrusions in private-sector and government networks”.

In what may be one of the slated Chinese targets, it was reported on August 14, 2015, that the Philippines will open a military base near the disputed sea with China. According to reports, U.S. forces will be present, providing a motive for a revenge-like attack by China.

In what appears to be the war game for a Chinese attack and subsequent invasion, it was reported on August 16, 2015, that China staged naval drills in the Sea of Japan which trained for beach landing. Consequently, the full scale invasion of Hawaii, Japan or Taiwan by China may be imminent.

In what appears to be pre-Chinese attack/invasion programming, more than 10 countries will join China’s massive military parade on September 3, 2015, which appears to be a global publicity stunt designed to show off China’s military strength just prior to a staged attack.

This notion was confirmed by CNN on August 30, 2015, when they published a report entitled “Military Parade to Lift Curtain on China’s ‘Game-Changing’ Missiles, Fighter Fleet” which foreshadowed that the game is about to change in respect to the China’s military.

In order to provide a timely motive for a Chinese-based attack on the United States, it was reported on August 30, 2015, that the U.S. is now developing sanctions against China over the alleged cyber-thefts. Consequently, a revenge-like attack by China is likely forthcoming.

The notion that the aforementioned Chinese military parade will lead to war was foreshadowed by a Russia Today report from August 31, 2015, entitled “Dogs of Western Resentment Bark as Chinese WWII Parade Passes”, further raising the specter of Chinese resentment of the West just prior to a staged attack.

In what appears to be pre-Chinese drone attack propaganda, Russia Today published a report on August 31, 2015, entitled “Toe to Toe with US: China Unveils its Heaviest Drone”, further highlighting a future confrontation between the U.S. and China.

Lastly, in what appears to be the state-sponsored war games for a Chinese attack on America, it was reported on September 2, 2015, that Russia and China are executing the largest naval exercise yet. Said drill will likely involve an unprovoked attack/invasion of Australia, Hawaii, Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines or the continental United States.

Top Chinese Attack Locations
Although a Pearl Harbor-like surprise attack against the United Stated by China could theoretically transpire in any American city or U.S. military base, the following seven location are the most likely due to their name recognition and close proximity to the Pacific Ocean.

Potential Chinese Attack Locations:

1. San Francisco, California
2. Seattle, Washington
3. Las Vegas, Nevada
4. Los Angeles, California
5. San Diego, California
6. Honolulu, Hawaii
7. Naval Station Pearl Harbor
8. Australia
9.
Japan
10.
Philippines
11.
Taiwan

Cyber War China

Chinese Cyber Attack  on US Banks/ATMs
In the event that China executes a major cyber-related attack against the U.S., it will most likely target America’s financial system, namely banks. A future cyber-terror scenario in which Chinese hackers either delete or add trillions of fraudulent U.S. dollars to bank accounts now appears to be in order. In the case of the latter, the U.S. dollar will become worthless overnight, causing a run on the banks as well as the bankruptcy of the U.S. In order to link China with ATM’s just prior to an attack that will add or minus trillions from ATM’s, it was reported back on June 1, 2015, that Chinese researchers have invented the world’s first facial recognition ATM. Roughly 6-weeks later on July 20, 2015, it was reported that police recovered a stolen ATM machine in a parking lot after it fell out of a robber’s getaway van. The incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to show that ATM’s are vulnerable just prior to an unprecedented financial-related cyber-attack that causes a run on the banks, namely ATM’s. In order to foreshadow the notion of frozen bank funds just prior to the state-sponsored hack, it was reported on August 5, 2015, that victims of Iranian terror attacks ae suing to block the release of frozen funds. Needless to say, in the aftermath of a hack which adds trillions to the money supply, the federal government will freeze all bank accounts until the crisis is over, causing chaos and looting across America. Two days later on August 7, 2015, Chinese hackers reportedly attacked the U.S. travel industry, an incident designed to sell the notion that China is now targeting the U.S. The notion of a financial-related attack was coincidentally witnessed 5-days later on August 11, 2015, when hackers made off with $100 million from insider trades. That same day, August 11, 2015, it was also reported that 32 people were charged in the $100 million insider-trading hacking plot. A day later on August 12, 2015, the Telegraph published a report entitled “China Cannot Risk the Global Chaos of Currency Devaluation”, associating China with both global chaos and currency devaluation just prior to a cyber-related attack that brings about both, namely in the U.S. The notion of a cyber-attack holding a country hostage was highlighted that same day on August 12, 2015, when Fox News published a video report entitled “Mideast Hackers Looking to Hold US Gas Pumps Hostage?”. Although gas pumps could theoretically be targeted, banks and their ATM’s are a far more likely target. Also on August 12, 2015, the Blaze published a report entitled “‘Soon, Very Soon You Will See’: ISIS Hacking Group Issues Chilling Warning to America”, further raising the notion that American is about to suffer a massive cyber-attack. A day later on August 13, 2015, Fox News published a report entitled 50 Cent’s Bankruptcy Is a Lesson in Valuing What You Earn”, highlighting the notion of bankruptcy just prior to the U.S. being forced to declare bankruptcy in the aftermath of a Chinese cyber-attack. Lastly, in order to highlight fake money just prior to an unprecedented cyber-related attack on the U.S. financial system that suddenly deposits trillions of fake dollars in people’s bank accounts, a number of propaganda reports citing the use of fake money or money-related certificates have been published. For example, on August 13, 2015, a Virginia man reportedly plead guilty to felony charges after cashing an erroneous check. That same day, August 13, 2015, a man reportedly admitted to bringing in counterfeit chips to a poker tournament. A day later on August 14, 2015, a former Brooklyn Nets basketball player reportedly cashed a fake money order for $1,000. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a state-sponsored cyber-related terror attack on America’s financial system is imminent. Although the country of China will be blamed, CIA minions in Switzerland will profit.

department-homeland-security-securing-the-cities-los-angeles-nuclear-attack-war-false-flag

California Nuclear Attack Drills
In what appears to be the nuclear terror drills for a Chinese nuke attack upon Las Vegas or Los Angeles, it was reported on April 1, 2015, that DHS executed a nuke attack drill on the US-Mexico border. According to reports, the exercise simulated “an emergency involving the detonation of a weapon of mass destruction near the U.S./Mexico border”. Authorities drilled on how they would deal with thousands of people crossing over from Mexico to escape the catastrophe, a scenario which would transpire in reality post-nuclear attack in Las Vegas and/or Los Angeles. Two days later on April 3, 2015, it was revealed that a dirty bomb drill would be executed on April 11, 2015 involving hundreds of soldiers, airmen, police and fire officials. According to reports, the nuclear terror drill was executed in Richmond, California, just 381 miles north of Los Angles.  Lastly, less than 2-weeks later on April 24, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Military held another dirty bomb decontamination exercise in Michigan. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the Michigan drill was preparation for the Chinese nuclear terror attack slated for Los Angeles and/or Las Vegas.

Earthquake/Tsunami Planned Post Nuclear Attack
In the aftermath of a Las Vegas and/or California nuclear attack by China, a man-made earthquake will predictably take place in California. This particular notion was confirmed on April 26, 2015, when the Financial Times published a report entitled “California Prepares for the Next ‘Big One’”. A day prior on April 25, 2015, the LA Times published a report entitled “Researcher Says a Sinking Santa Catalina could Pose Tsunami Threat”, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that a tsunami is planned in the wake of a nuclear attack and earthquake.

U.S. vs. China Trending
Recent reports in respect to China suggest that they are about to strike the United States. For example, back on August 21, 2014, it was reported that a Chinese jet carried out an “aggressive” intercept of a U.S. Navy intelligence jet, a potential act of war. Two days later on August 23, 2014, it was reported that the U.S. sent a second aircraft carrier to Asia amid tensions with China. In the wake of a Chinese attack, the carrier deployment by Obama will likely be cited as the motive for the drone attack. Three days later on August 26, 2014, it was reported that a futuristic Chinese “supersonic” sub could reach America’s shores in less than two hours. The report was evidently designed to show that the Chinese can attack America whenever they want. A day later on August 27, 2014, it was reported that a Chinese fighter jet’s interception of a U.S. Navy sub-hunter aircraft was possibly triggered when the American plane dropped a sonar surveillance system into the South China Sea. The incident was designed to be a U.S. provocation that could theoretically be construed as an act of war. Lastly, on September 9, 2014, it was reported that U.S. National Security Adviser Susan Rice stated that China and the United States should avoid close calls between their respective militaries. The statement by Rice was evidently made in order to show that the U.S. and China are on thin ice and one event could trigger an all-out war between the two nuclear powers.

Chinese EMP Nuke Drone Attack

Surprise Attack Propaganda
Prior to a high-profile Asian based attack on the United States, the public must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Hollywood movie propaganda is a slick way of showing that yes, it can happen. “Red Dawn” (2012) is a film (see trailer) in which the United States is the victim of a red-dawn surprise attack by military aircraft from North Korea. “Battleship” (2012) is another film (see trailer) in which the U.S. Navy and the State of Hawaii are the victims of a surprise attack, by transformer-like machines. “Olympus Has Fallen” (2013) is a film (see trailer) in which Washington D.C., is ambushed in a surprise attack by an ex-North Korean terrorists who employ military aircraft, suicide bombers and cyber-attacks in a bid to overthrow the U.S. government. “Pacific Rim” (2013) is a film (see trailer) which features a plot in which the U.S. is attacked by monster-like machines from deep under the Pacific Ocean. According to the trailer, the machines target San Francisco, California, Manila, Philippines, and Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, two of which are targets in reality. On May 16, 2014, “Godzilla” (2014) is a film (see trailer) which depicted an Asian-based monster who travels across the Pacific to attack the city of San Francisco. Interestingly, a day before the movie premiered, a San Francisco traffic sign was reportedly hacked to warn drivers of a “Godzilla Attack”. Exactly when this Asian “surprise” attack propaganda will manifest itself in reality is not known, but the masses have been conditioned for an attack on the West Coast of America, one which may transpire prior to during the 2014 RIMPAC Navel Exercise.

I. CHINESE CYBER-ATTACK:

u-s-government-warned-of-9-11-like-cyber-attack-67071d7042

1.1: Chinese Cyber-Attacks Trending
The notion that the Chinese government is actively hacking the U.S. military was confirmed back on September 18, 2014, when it was revealed by a U.S. Senate panel that the China has hacked U.S. military contractors. Roughly 2-months later on November 2, 2014, it was reported that China has successfully developed a laser-based drone defense system. The report was designed to show that China is actively developing drone system, one which will go offensive in the near future. A week later on November 9, 2014, it was reported that China will launch the world’s longest ‘hack-proof’ network by 2016, further tying China to hacking just prior to an unprecedented cyber-hijack of U.S. drones. Coincidentally, a day later on November 10, 2014, it was reported that the U.S. Postal Service confirmed a security breach and that the Chinese hackers are suspected. Three days later on November 12, 2014, the Chinese allegedly hacked U.S. weather systems as well as a satellite network. The wave of Chinese cyber-attacks is designed to show that Chinese cyber-related aggression is escalating. Lastly, on November 20, 2014, CNN published a report entitled “The U.S. Government Thinks China could take Down the Power Grid”. Needless to say, the timely propaganda report was designed to foreshadow a massive Chinese cyber-attack on the United States not only possible but imminent.

1.2: U.S. Vulnerable to Cyber-Attack
In what appears to be a warning of a Chinese attack, Fox News published a report on November 25, 2014 entitled “Amid Hacking Attack, State Department Info-Security Still in Shambles. The timely report stated that the U.S. government “identified control deficiencies across a total of 102 different systems”. In other words, the entire U.S. government has been hacked, most likely be China. The report also stated that the info-tech weaknesses amount to a “significant deficiency” in its security, defined as a weakness that “significantly restricts the capability of the agency to carry out its mission or compromises the security of its information, information systems, personnel, or other resources, operations, or assets”. A day later on November 26, 2014, Fox New published a report entitled “US Lacks Strategy to Counter Unconventional Warfare Threats from States and Terrorists. The timely report by the Army Special Operations Command stated that China is waging unconventional warfare around the world, and the U.S. currently lacks a clear strategy to counter the threat. In other words, the U.S. is vulnerable to an unconventional Chinese attack, something a drone attack would qualify under. The report went on to state that “This challenge is hybrid warfare combining conventional, irregular, and asymmetric means, to include the persistent manipulation of political and ideological conflict”.

reign-malware-1000x520

1.3: Regin Malware
The Chinese malware needed for a successful cyber-attack on the United States was recently identified by CNN in their November 23, 2014, report entitled “‘Regin’ Malware Described as ‘Groundbreaking and Almost Peerless’”. According to the timely report, “Reign” is malware that has been lurking in computers for as long as six years, according to Symantec (SYMC, Tech30), the cybersecurity firm that produces Norton Antivirus. “Its capabilities and the level of resources behind Regin indicate that it is one of the main cyberespionage tools used by a nation state,” Symantec explained and that “development took months, if not years, to complete.” Researchers stated little to answer several key questions such as: Who designed it? How widely has it spread? What has it scooped up? What are the risks? In other words, the entire internet infrastructure of the United States has been hijacked by the Regin malware and therefore any type of cyber-related attack or hijack of on America’s military is possible. In reality, the internet was built specifically so that a third party can access it and crash certain entities when politically expedient.

II: CYBER-HIJACK DRONE ATTACK:

2.1 Chinese Cyber-Hijack Possible

Back on November 19, 2013, U.S. Navy Captain Mark Hagerott warned that sonic computer viruses launched by hackers could “jump the air gap” and target military systems that are not connected to the internet. In other words, Chinese computer viruses are able to attack U.S. military defense systems, even those not connected to the internet. The report was evidently designed to make the notion of drone hacking seem more feasible prior to its fruition in reality. After all, if viruses are able to “jump the air gap”, infecting airborne drones isn’t such an outrageous mental leap.

drone

2.2: Drone Hijack Propaganda
In order to bring unprecedented media attention to cyber-hijacking prior to the China hijacking U.S. drones to launch attacks, it was reported on March 16, 2014, that the missing Malaysian Flight MH370 may have been the world’s first ever cyber hijack. Shortly thereafter, the television series entitled “24: Live Another Day” (2014) debuted on May 5, 2014. In short, the plot depicts Islamic terrorists who hijack U.S. military drones. Once under control of the terrorists, the drones are used to attack U.S. interests and allies. A “secret device” is used in the show to override U.S. cyber-security, suddenly turning friendly drones into enemy drones. Because the drones are built with the latest stealth technology, they are almost impossible to bring down. Consequently, the hijacked drones are used to attack football stadiums and hospitals in London, England, killing and terrorizing scores of people. Instead of the U.S. government gaining control over its own drones, a hacker is the one who finds the override code which can be used to control the drones.

2.3: System-Aware Secure Sentinel (SASS)
In what appears to be pre-Chinese drone cyber-hijack programming, it was reported on December 6, 2014, that a US shield will protect drones from ‘spoofing’ cyber-attacks. According to the report, Pentagon-sponsored engineers have developed a system to shield unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) from cyber-attacks. Called “System-Aware Secure Sentinel” (SASS), the new system detects “illogical behavior” compared to how the aircraft normally operates and sounds the alert if a drone starts doing something that it is not supposed to do. “Detections can serve to initiate automated recovery actions and alert operators of the attack,” said Barry Horowitz, a systems and information engineer at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, in a statement. Various threats were simulated by the researchers during five days of in-flight tests, including cyber-attacks launched from the ground, interference with supply chains and attacks from military insiders.

2.4: China’s Military Hacking Program
In order to create a believable narrative in the media prior to China’s cyber-hijack of U.S. drones, a number of fabricated incidents and staged events have taken place in order to set the stage for the attack. For example, on May 19, 2014, the U.S. officially accused China of hacking 6 companies, stating that China was after U.S. military secrets. This was the first time that a nation state was officially charged by the U.S. with cyber-espionage. In total, 5 Chinese “military hackers” were indicted in U.S. courts for cyber spying. Predictably, a day later on May 20, 2014, China suspended its cybersecurity cooperation with the U.S. over the aforementioned charges. That same day, Chinese officials confronted a U.S. envoy over the cyber-spying accusations in what appeared to be a CIA-spawned publicity stunt. Less than 24-hours later on May 21, 2014, China banned the use of Windows 8 on Chinese government computers, producing even more international headlines about the incident. Three days later on May 24, 2014, a report stated that the U.S. plans to “keep up the pressure” on China and that it is now in the process of selecting from a range of retaliatory options. Five days later on May 29, 2014, China openly suggested that the U.S. may have made up evidence for cyber-attacks, further confirming that the cyber-rift is indeed just political theater. Roughly 2 weeks later on June 10, 2014, it was revealed that the Chinese military has been hacking the U.S. aerospace industry for the last 7 years, a timely report designed to show that China likely has the ability to hack U.S. drones. Lastly, on June 10, 2014, it was revealed that a second Chinese military unit has been linked to hacking. According to reports, the Chinese hackers launched attacks against defense, satellite and aerospace firms within the U.S., Japan and Europe. Needless to say, the notion that China and her military are actively engaged in cyber-attacks against the U.S. military has been well established, making the notion of U.S. drones being cyber-hijacked by China seem all the more feasible.

2.5: Revenge Drone Attack

In order to provide a timely motive for a Chinese attack on America using U.S. drones, it was revealed on May 30, 2014, that the U.S. has deployed two advanced military drones to a Japanese airbase. Since China is currently in a dispute with Japan over the Senkaku Islands, the placement of the drones by the U.S. was a slap in the face designed to infuriate China just prior to a revenge attack using cyber-hijacked U.S. drones. Roughly a month later on June 26, 2014, U.S. military experts warned that killer drones will trigger a “slippery slope” into endless war, a propaganda report deigned to foreshadow the start of the cyber-war between the U.S. and China. As previously mentioned, once a drone war starts between the U.S. and China, cyber-hijackings followed by deadly drone attacks will become the norm. This drone war scenario essentially allows the CIA to attack whomever and whatever they want, whenever they want to. In the aftermath of the attack, the U.S. will blame China and China will blame the U.S. In essence, drones attacks will be used to eliminate anybody who doesn’t comply with system.

HT_sting_of_the_Drone_mar_140507_16x9_608

2.6: “Sting of the Drone”

The notion that the U.S. and China are on an irreversible collision course was recently highlighted during a CNN interview with Richard A. Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar under George W. Bush. Clark stated in respect to the escalation of cyber-espionage between the United States and China that, “I actually hope it does result in escalation and tit-for-tat, because we need this issue resolved…We can’t go on the way it’s been…This first step by the United States will undoubtedly result in an escalation of this issue. And we need to do that. We need to have this issue resolved one way or the other. If the Chinese are going to keep hacking into our companies, then we’re going to have to do something about it”. Interestingly, Clark made his comments while promoting “Sting of the Drone” (2014), his latest book about the impending drone war with China. The interview, which was documented in the May 21, 2014, CNN report entitled “Why U.S./China Cyber Escalation Could Be Good”, is yet another example of how wars are created by the CIA long before they manifest themselves in reality.

III. CHINESE NUCLEAR ATTACK:

3.1: Chinese Nuclear Attack
The notion of a Chinese nuclear attack on the U.S. was openly flaunted back on October 31, 2013, when the Chinese government released nuclear blast map projections for the U.S. cities of Seattle and Los Angeles after they were struck by Chinese nuclear warheads. A few weeks later on December 17, 2013, a Chinese space rover advert showed Europe being nuked, another ominous sign that a Chinese nuclear strike against the West is imminent. According to a report published on February 6, 2014, new Chinese-based submarine patrols have put Hawaii and Alaska within nuclear attack range, further foreshadowing a West Coast nuclear attack by China. Four days later on February 10, 2014, China reportedly showed off its new mobile ICBM on the internet, suggesting that China will soon be using her nuclear weapons in a mobile and offensive manner.

Live TV Nuke

3.2: Chinese Cyber-Hijack Nuke Attack
The notion of a surprise cyber-attack by an Asian country was ominously foreshadowed in the Washington Times report from January 8, 2015, entitled “Preventing a ‘Cyber Pearl Harbor’”. The report stated “we have now reached a new era of cyberterrorism where threats cause just as much damage and fear as a bomb threat”, ultimately linking a cyber-related attack to a real world bomb, most likely nuclear in nature. A television-based cyber-hijack and nuke attack would be a redux of a previous Chinese attack plot depicted in the June 30, 2013, Truther.org report entitled “Live TV” Cyber-Hijack With “Live” Nuclear Detonation Now Trending”. The notion of a Chinese nuclear attack on the U.S. was openly flaunted back on October 31, 2013, when the Chinese government released nuclear blast map projections for the U.S. cities of Seattle and Los Angeles after they were struck by Chinese nuclear warheads. A few weeks later on December 17, 2013, a Chinese space rover advert showed Europe being nuked, another ominous sign that a Chinese nuclear strike against the West is imminent. According to a report published on February 6, 2014, new Chinese-based submarine patrols have put Hawaii and Alaska within nuclear attack range, further foreshadowing a West Coast nuclear attack by China. Four days later on February 10, 2014, China reportedly showed off its new mobile ICBM on the internet, suggesting that China will soon be using her nuclear weapons in a mobile and offensive manner.

IV. CHINESE EMP ATTACK:

4.1: China’s EMP Quest
In a January 8, 2011, report entitled “China’s Quest For Dominance In Electro-Magnetic Warfare”, it was revealed that “China’s continued advancement in their air defense sector has continued to raise more concerns” and that “the Dong Feng 21D, a land-based anti-ship ballistic missile that officials now say has reached its initial operating capability. Which analysts have said the new Chinese missile leaves U.S. aircraft carriers vulnerable to [an EMP] attack”. The article also quotes Vice Admiral Jack Dorsett, the deputy chief of naval operations for information dominance and the service’s intelligence director, as stating that China is trying to dominate “in the electro-magnetic spectrum, to conduct counterspace capabilities, and clearly to conduct cyber activities.” China has already been set-up as the EMP terror scapegoat much the same way that it has been set-up as the cyber-terror scapegoat. If the reports are to be believed, China is currently developing EMP weapons and could use them against U.S. aircraft carriers in a future conflict. If and when an EMP attack strikes America, there is a high probability that China will be ultimately scapegoated and attacked, so long as the American military is able to function post-EMP attack.

4.2: Chinese EMP Attack?
Back on November 10, 2010, it was reported that a satellite monitoring the western coast region of North America detected an “EMP anomalous event” when a Chinese sub allegedly fired an EMP weapon on November 8, 2010. According to the report, the Chinese Navy attacked the U.S. based cruise ship entitled the “Carnival Splendor” with an EMP missile, resulting in a “catastrophic crippling” that left 4,500 passengers stranded and its crew “dead in the water”. Later that day on November 8, 2010, a mysterious missile was caught on video flying off the coast of California near Los Angeles, California. Although the U.S. government denied that they were responsible for the missile, a Russian report later stated that the missile was in fact a BGM-109 (Tomahawk) subsonic cruise missile launched from a U.S. Navy Ohio-Class submarine operating off the coast of California. What exactly happened that day is not clear, but apparently the U.S. and/or the Chinese military attacked the “Carnival Splendor” with an EMP missile. Evidently, the U.S. Navy sent up a Tomahawk cruise missile as a decoy to distract people from this unprecedented EMP missile attack on an American cruise ship. Conversely, it is also possible that the mysterious missile caught flying off the coast of California was in fact the U.S. EMP missile responsible for the “catastrophic crippling” of the Carnival Splendor.

About the Author
David Chase Taylor is an American journalist and the editor-in-chief of Truther.org, a state-sponsored terror whistle-blower website. Taylor currently lives in Switzerland where he applied for political asylum on July 17, 2015. Taylor authored The Nuclear Bible, a book credited with foiling a nuclear terror attack upon Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011, and Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now, a book and website exposing the true power structure of the world, especially in respect to Greenland and its primary proxy state of Switzerland which is coincidentally home to the CIA. Taylor has also published The Bio-Terror Bible, a book and website exposing the global bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. To date, Taylor has blown the whistle on over 100 state-sponsored terror plots, including the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror Plot, the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the Terrorgate Scandal, the 2014 Memorial Day Massacre, the man-made asteroid attack planned for 2015, and the drone strike which killed “Fast and Furious” star Paul Walker. Taylor was also the first to expose Alex Jones’ treacherous links to STRATFOR and is noted for the 10 reasons why the Rosetta Comet landing was a hoax.

READ: World’s ‘Most Wanted’ Whistle-Blower Journalist David Chase Taylor Applies for Political Asylum in Switzerland

Truther.org Legal Disclaimer
Truther.org’s stated purpose is to stop terrorism by drawing unwanted global attention to terror plots prior to their fruition. Terror alerts and warnings made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility that they may occur based on breaking terror-related news, events and data. Historically speaking, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed, it is immediately canceled, postponed, or reworked (e.g., the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Freedom Tower Nuclear Terror Plot, etc.). State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats, create plausible deniability, and mislead the public from the usual suspects of terror which work at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland. Please support real citizen journalism and help make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste

0001 SAFDCT
customLogo.gif
truther-rss

US Russia World War III

Download & Forward PDF

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor officially applied for political asylum in Switzerland on July 17, 2015, the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called “natural disasters” I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, the Swiss CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in Switzerland, consider this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland was harboring the CIA; and b) the CIA has historically not shat were it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland.

JADE HELM 15: CIA Plotting ISIS Invasion of America, Oak Keeper Massacres, Wave of Domestic/Jihad Terror Attacks, Predator Drone Strikes, Suspension of 2016 US Presidential Election, Martial Law & Obama Dictatorship

ISIS ENDGAME: How & Why the CIA Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks

RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA

BREAKING: CERN Complex in Switzerland Identified as CIA Headquarters

David Chase Taylor
August 19, 2015
Truther.org

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Ever since Truther.org revealed that the CIA in Switzerland created ISIS as political cover for nuclear and biological terror attacks, the Swiss CIA has been grooming Russia for a confrontation with the U.S. that will predictably lead to World War III.

In short, the 700-year cover of the CIA in Switzerland was officially blown for the first time in history by whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor in his shocking new book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) and therefore the Swiss CIA is beyond desperate to start World War III.

It is imperative to note that NATO, Russia, the United States and their two respective puppets named Putin and Obama are under the command and control of the CIA in Switzerland, all of which are indirectly funded by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland.

Although a Russian-based attack could theoretically transpire anywhere along its vast borders (e.g., Poland, Sweden, Ukraine, etc.), breaking news suggest that the U.S. state of Alaska will suffer a Russian attack and subsequent invasion. Considering Alaska was purchased from Russia for only $7.2 million in 1867, an invasion to take it back is all but expected.

The notion that the U.S. in concerned about the potential Russian invasion of Alaska was recently rehashed on September 1, 2014, by Telegraph report entitled “America’s Secret Plan to Stop Russian Invasion of Alaska Revealed” which highlighted the Operation Washtub.

According to reports, Operation Washtub was a U.S. military program designed to recruit Alaskan fishermen, trappers and bush pilots as “stay-behind agents” to form a secret American resistance network if and when Russia staged a widely-feared invasion of the state.

The notion that Russia is targeting Alaska was first identified on May 1, 2015, when it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska. The incident conforms, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing an attack on Alaska.

Shortly thereafter in June of 2015, the U.S. war game exercise entitled Northern Edge 2015 was executed in Alaska. The drills reportedly involved more than 200 aircraft and 6,000 U.S. soldiers from all four branches of the military. The unprecedented drill appears to be the U.S. military’s planned response to the impending Russian invasion.

In order to sell the notion that a Russian invasion is imminent, Russian bombers executed a flyby of Alaska on July 4, 2015. Considering that the incident was not reported until 3-weeks later, it can be deduced that the incident was fabricated by the CIA in order to foreshadow a Russia attack on Alaska.

The notion that Russia is about to stage an invasion of the artic was foreshadowed in an August 8, 2015, report from Fox News entitled “Republicans Slam Obama Administration as Russia Tries Arctic Land Grab”. Considering that Alaska is in the artic, an invasion by Russia may be forthcoming.

In order to provide a timely motive for a Russian-based attack on the United States, it was reported on August 11, 2015, that the hit TV terror show “Homeland” will take on Russian President Vladimir Putin in season 5.

That same day, August 11, 2015, it was also reported that the White House blocked a Pentagon report on a missile treaty that was breached by Russia. Considering that Russia allegedly violated the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, a breach of other peace treaties is likely forthcoming.

In order to foreshadow that native Alaskans will suddenly become Russia citizens, it was also reported on August 11, 2015, that visa-free travel to Russia will be reinstated for eligible Alaska Natives. The shocking development was designed to show that diplomatic relations with Russia are about to change in a major way.

A day later on August 12, 2015, it was reported that Japanese paratroopers took part in landmark jump over Alaska. Needless to say, the timely report was designed to foreshadow an invasion of Alaska, most likely by Russian paratroopers.

In what appears to be an ominous sign that a Russian invasion of the U.S. is imminent, it was reported on August 13, 2015, that Russia has moved a huge number of troops to its western border. The alleged move by Russia is an apparent fake to invade Europe while they secretly plot to invade Alaska.

A day later on August 14, 2015, it was reported that a classified Pentagon exercises revealed that the U.S. would struggle to win a war with Russia. The timely report of the once classified exercise was designed to foreshadow the notion that war between the U.S. and Russia is imminent.

That same day, August 14, 2015, it was also reported that the American F-35 fighter is “inferior” to Russia’s Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter aircraft. Again, the timely report was designed to show that the U.S. is inferior to Russia just prior to the surprise attack and/or invasion of Alaska.

A day later on August 15, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Radical Christians Raid Soviet Art Show in Moscow”. The timely report was designed to foreshadow a Russian “raid” just prior to the full-scale invasion of Alaska by Russia.

In what appears to be pre-Russian attack politics, it was reported on August 16, 2015, that Russia is now squeezing critics at home by declaring them “foreign agents”. In other words, Putin is now cracking down on dissent just prior to an unprovoked attack on America, namely Alaska.

In order to put Alaska in the international spotlight just prior to Russian invasion, it was reported on August 18, 2015, that the U.S. will now let Shell drill for oil off the coast of Alaska. Considering that Shell has been drilling in Alaska for years, it can be deduced that the report is a fabricated propaganda report.

That same day, August 18, 2015, it was reported that an Alaska Village is now seeking to be reunited with their Russian relatives. Again, the timely report was designed to foreshadow that Alaska will be reunited with Russia post-Russian invasion.

Lastly, on August 19, 2015, it was reported that 3 men are missing and presumed dead after several landslides in Alaska. The landslides were man-made in nature in order to put Alaska in the national media spotlight just prior to an attack.

World War III US & Russia

World War III Propaganda
Prior to World War III between the U.S. and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, U.S. versus Russia propaganda is now at an all-time high which suggests that a false-flag attack that triggers a nuclear World War III is imminent. This particular narrative was first identified by Truther.org back on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea, causing the Russian defense minister to state that the incident “pose[d] a danger to strategic stability” between the two countries. Roughly a week later on June 8, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Russia has Better Things To Do than Start WW3”, raising the notion of World War III involving Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations visited Ukraine, slamming Russian ‘aggression’. The timely comment foreshadows a Russian-based attack on Ukraine, one which may be nuclear in nature. Five days later on June 16, 2015, Russia herself warned of a “new military confrontation” in Europe, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia will be at war in Europe in the near future. A day later on June 17, 2015, CNN published a report entitled “U.S.-Russia Military Tit for Tat Raises Fears of Greater Conflict”, suggesting that a local U.S.-Russian conflict could translate into World War III. Lastly, on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III between the U.S. and Russia.

Close Calls
Aside from the aforementioned World War III rhetoric and propaganda, there have been a number of close calls which have set the scene for a military showdown between the United States and Russia. One of these incidents could be misinterpreted (purposely of course) which could translate into a hot war between Russia and U.S. and NATO forces. The first close call between the U.S. and Russia was reported on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea. The incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia naval conflict in the Black Sea. This notion is confirmed by NATO war games ongoing in the Black Sea. A day later on June 1, 2015, it was reported that Russian and U.S. planes had a close encounter near Crimea, foreshadowing an aerial-related conflict between the two countries. Again, the incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia conflict in Ukraine. Nine days later on June 10, 2015, it was reported that a Russian jet reportedly harassed U.S. reconnaissance plane, otherwise known as a spy plane. According to reports, the Russian Su-27 fighters reportedly intercepted a US RC-135 intelligence aircraft on May 30, 2015. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a similar incident will lead to a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia.

Putin Nuke Nuclear

Russian Nuclear Terror Attack
Exactly one month before the aforementioned book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) was published on December 21, 2014, Forbes published a report on November 21, 2014, entitled “Does Russia Think Their New Nuclear Weapons Could Win A War?”. This was the first-ever report identified by Truther.org which foreshadowed an unprecedented and unprovoked nuclear strike by Russia. Ever since revelations where made public that Switzerland harbors the CIA, the international media (which operates at the behest of the CIA) has been inundated with the Russian nuclear attack narrative. For example, it was reported back on March 15, 2015, that Vladimir Putin stated that Russia is preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary”. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin again threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Crimea in Ukraine. It is imperative to note that the latter two reports invoking Ukraine and a nuclear attack are key because aside from the United States, Ukraine is most likely NATO country to suffer a Russian nuclear strike. Roughly a month later on May 1, 2015, it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska, conforming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing a nuclear strike. Roughly 4-weeks later on May 27, 2015, a NATO general warned that Russian President Putin is a “dangerous gambler…willing to use nuclear weapons”, an apparent preview of things to come. The notion of a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia was foreshadowed in a Russia Today report from June 7, 2015, entitled “UK Could Host US Nukes to Counter Increased ‘Russian Activity’”, as well as a Telegraph report entitled “Nuclear Missiles Could be Sited Again on British Soil in New ‘Cold War’ with Russia”. In what appears to be an ominous sign of things to come, the Daily Star published a report on June 8, 2015, entitled “Armageddon Strikes: Massive Cloud Sparks Russian Nuclear Attack Panic”. A day later on June 9, 2015, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt was enacted by intelligence operative Mark Dice who created a petition to nuke Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “US and Russia ‘Playing Nuclear Chicken with Each Other’”, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that nuclear war between the two nations is imminent. A day later on June 12, 2015, it was reported that people in Moscow widely oppose the fake petition to nuke America, further raising the specter of nuclear war between the two countries. Four days later on June 16, 2015, Russian President Putin reportedly stated that Russia will get 40 new intercontinental missiles this year, all of which are nuclear in nature. Four days later on June 17, 2015, Kremlin officials stated that Russia’s nuclear buildup is being forced by the West. Three days later on June 20, 2015, Putin stated that the world was no closer to Cold War-style nuclear standoff, raising the notion of a nuclear confrontation just prior to its fruition in reality. Three days later on June 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “The Pentagon Goes Nuclear on Russia” which stated that Russian submarines off the coast of America could engage in a “nuclear turkey shoot”, knocking out every major American city within a few minutes. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles which travel through space. Lastly, on June 25, 2015, Reuters published a report entitled “Russia ‘Playing with Fire’ with Nuclear Saber-Rattling”, further inferring that a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia is now in play by the CIA.

Russian Bio-Terror Attack
Although a Russian-based nuclear attack are the most likely scenario, there is also the chance that the Swiss CIA could spark a biological pandemic in Europe during the impending conflict between the U.S. and Russia. How this bio-terror pandemic will manifest is not yet known, but it has been foreshadowed in the news nonetheless. For example, on June 5, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Expert Predicts Anthrax Attacks Will Be Used to Push Russian War”, consummating the terms Anthrax and Russia within the same headlines. Ten days later on June 15, 2015, Infowars published another report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, stating that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. Needless to say, one of these bio-labs in Eastern Europe could be directly attacked or suffer collateral damage, leading to a biological outbreak that could spark the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015.

I. ALL THE WORLD IS A STAGE:

BIS (2)

1.1: US & Russia Funded by BIS in Switzerland
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland is the financial backbone of the CIA in Switzerland which secretly funds its black operations around the world. In short, the BIS funds 60 central banks which are collectively responsible for 95% of the world’s GDP, making it the sole progenitor of the world’s fiat money supply. These central banks include the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States which funds the U.S. government and her military, and the Bank of Russia which funds the Russian government and her military. Consequently, all monies allocated to the U.S. and Russia for World War III originated from the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland which, aside from Vatican City, is the only country to bear a sovereign flag. Consequently, the United States and Russia do not have sovereign flags, meaning that they are not in control of their own destiny nor their own respective militaries.

Obama Putin

1.2: Presidential Puppets Obama & Putin
Since both U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin are puppets of the CIA, they have no real power and only act when told to do so. In other words, neither of them is actually in charge; they are just political puppets posing for the cameras. However, in order to create the public perception that the beef between the U.S. and Russia is real, Obama reportedly urged G7 leaders to maintain the sanctions on Russia while simultaneously admitting that they don’t work. A day later on June 6, 2015, Putin reportedly stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. The premediated soundbite was given in order to create the perception that Putin is crazy, especially in the aftermath of unprovoked nuclear strikes against the U.S. and NATO. Lastly, it was reported on June 24, 2015, that Putin’s approval rating is at an historic high at 89%, inferring that virtually all of Russia supports his reckless policy. In the aftermath of a nuclear World War III, Putin will be blamed rather that the CIA who orchestrated the nuclear conflict to begin with.

II. PRE-WORLD WAR III PROGRAMMING:

2.1: World War III Saber Rattling
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, saber rattling between the NATO nations and Russia is currently at an all-time high which suggests that a real world attack between the two nations is imminent. Aside from the fact that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska on May 1, 2015, Russia instituted a travel ban against EU officials on May 31, 2015. Less than a week later on June 5, 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military training and exercises to counter Russia. A day later on June 6, 2015, a government reported stated that the U.S. is now considering a harder stance on Russia, one that will predictably lead to war. Two days later on June 7, 2015, U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO, suggesting that an armed conflict is only a matter of time. Less than 48-hours later on June 9, 2015, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush called for a tougher policy toward Russia and Putin. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015, a top Russian security official reportedly stated that the “U.S. would like Russia to cease to exist as a country”, a declaration of war if there ever was one. Lastly, that same day, June 22, 2015, the Independent published a report entitled “Russia ‘Aggression’: US Nuclear Missile Commander says Vladimir Putin’s Actions Echo Those of Nazi Germany in the 1930s”, a report evidently designed to invoke a Russian attack and invasion that may be nuclear in nature. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

Putin Russia

2.2: Motives for a Russian Attack
In order to create the necessary narrative in the media prior to unprovoked Russian nuclear strikes against NATO nations, a number of timely motives have been created by the Swiss CIA. For example, on May 31, 2015, it was reported that Russian President Putin was shut out from the G7 Meeting for the second year running. Less than 2-weeks later on June 10, 2015, the United States reportedly overtook Russia as the world’s top oil and gas producer. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. Roughly a week later on June 19, 2015, the EU Parliament voted to prolong economic sanctions against Crimea till June 2016. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, have given Russia at least 4 motives for an attack against NATO, one which may be nuclear in nature.

2.3: Russian Threats
Prior to a World War III between the U.S. and Russia, a number of threats must be leveled from both sides in order to give the perception that the conflict is real and not being orchestrated by the CIA in Switzerland. The first threat was identified on May 8, 2015, when it was reported that Russia intends to restore a spy base in Cuba, some 90 miles from American shores. That same day, May 8, 2015, Russian students projected a Russian-based tank attack on the White House, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to foreshadow a Russian attack on America. Roughly a month later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep. Since NATO is currently moving military equipment to its border with Russia, a Russian attack is forthcoming. Three days later on June 19, 2015, Russian President Putin stated that no one should talk to Russia through ultimatums, inferring that he will no longer be subjugated by the West. That same day, June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO, an off-handed threat to Ukraine which did in fact join NATO. Lastly, on June 23, 2015, a senior Russian diplomat stated that Russia will longer accept lectures from the United States. The timely comments were designed to show that Russia feels belittled by NATO and may lash out, possibly with nuclear strikes. Needless to say, these threats, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

III. WORLD WAR III ARMS BUILDUP:

Russia Putin

3.1: Russian Military Buildup
Prior to the start of World War III, Russia must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 15, 2015, when it was reported that Russia may beef up its border if U.S. military arms are stationed in Eastern Europe. Since U.S. arms are now flowing into NATO countries such as Poland, it can be assumed that Russia has made good on its promise. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was Russian President Putin stated that Russia will get 40 new nuclear intercontinental missiles this year, an ominous sign that nuclear war is imminent. Less than 24-hours later on June 17, 2015, it was reported that the Russian military is developing an anti-drone microwave gun. The timely propaganda report was designed to associate an aerial aircraft (drone) with radiation (microwave) just prior to nuclear airstrikes by Russia, most likely in America and/or Eastern Europe. Lastly, that same day, June 17, 2015, Russia showed off its news military equipment and vehicles at Army 2015 Expo near Moscow, a flexing of the Russian military muscle if you will. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

3.2: US & NATO Military Buildup

Prior to the start of World War III, NATO must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 4, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S, may deploy missiles in Europe to counter Russia. Ten days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now in talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe. That same day, June 14, 2015, it was reported that Poland and Lithuania discussing plans with the U.S. to harbor military equipment. Said talks became reality a day later on June 15, 2015, when the Pentagon reportedly sent heavy military equipment to Eastern Europe. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force may send F-22s to Europe over the “threat” from Russia. The massive military escalation in Eastern Europe was confirmed on June 18, 2015, when it was reported that NATO is conducting the biggest beef up of defenses since the Cold War. That same day, June 18, 2015, it was also reported that the Pentagon is now building a cruise missile shield to defend U.S. cities from Russia, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that U.S. cities will be attacked by Russian missiles, most likely nuclear in nature. Four days later on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive NATO arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III. The ongoing NATO buildup of weapons was confirmed yet again on June 5, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military aid to NATO to counter Russia. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015: Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide weapons, aircraft and commandos to NATO. A day later on June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. military is now moving tanks and other equipment to allied nations near the Russian border, including but not limited to: 250 military vehicles and Abrams tanks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

3.3: Black Sea Naval Buildup
In order to create the scene for a spectacular World War III battle between the U.S. and Russia, both sides must get their aircraft and ships in position prior an attack. Aside from the USS Taylor (FFG-50) and the USS Mount Whitney (LCC-20) which were originally stationed in the Black Sea during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, the U.S. has also sent the USS Truxtun to the Black Sea which is part of the USS George H.W. Bush strike group stationed in Mediterranean. On the Russian side, there are a total of 7 ships in the Black Sea. According to a March 5, 2014 report, two Russian warships have now entered the Black Sea through the Bosphorus en route to Crimea. The 150 ‘Saratov’ landing ship and the 156 ‘Yamal’ assault ship will reportedly join five other Russian naval ships which are currently stationed in the port city of Sevastopol which is adjacent to Crimea. These ships include the 30th Surface Ship Division, the 41st Missile Boat Brigade, the 247th Separate Submarine Division, the 68th Harbor Defense Ship, and the 422nd Separate Hydrographic Ship Division. In total, there are at least 11 ships in or near the Black Sea.

II. WORLD WAR III WAR GAMES:

putin-binoculars-AP

4.1: Russian War Games
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the Russian military must get their soldiers and equipment ready for battle. War games are in essence practice for war and they have been occurring at an alarming rate. The notion that Russia is actively training for an attack on NATO was first identified back on March 7, 2014, when the Pentagon confirmed that Russian is now conducting air defense drills that will conclude with live fire exercise. Two days later on March 9, 2015, it was reported that Russian jets are practicing “attack scenarios” on NATO ships, further foreshadowing a Russian-based attack, possibly nuclear in nature. Roughly a month later on April 30, 2015, it was reported that Russia and China will hold their first-ever joint naval drills in the Mediterranean in May 2015. Roughly a month later on May 25, 2015, it was reported that Russia launched a massive air force exercise with 250 aircraft, further foreshadowing the notion of a Russian-based aerial attack. Roughly 3-months later on August 11, 2015, it was reported that Iran and Russia held war games in which two Russian warships docked in Iran’s northern Anzali port. Whether these Russian ships will be used in a nuclear-related terror attack or invasion of the United States is not known, but it’s theoretically possible. Considering that war games have a tendency to go live, an armed conflict between NATO and Russia could commence at any time.

V: WHEN RUSSIA ATTACKS
:

5.1: Russian Attacks
In order to set the precedent for an unprecedented nuclear attack by Russia, a narrative has been created in the media by the Swiss CIA that Russia is responsible for a wave of cyber-attacks against the United States, setting the precedent for a far greater attack. This particular narrative was first identified back on January 18, 2014, when it was reported that Russia created the ‘BlackPOS Malware’ to hack Target and Neiman Marcus. Roughly 3-months later on April 8, 2015, it was reported that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. The notion of a Russia-based attack was foreshadowed by Russian President Putin on June 6, 2015, when he stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. Three days later on June 9, 2015, it was reported that the television station TV5 Monde was attack by Russia-based hackers. In the event that Russia launches nuclear strikes against NATO, the world’s TV stations will likely be simultaneously hijacked by a cyber-attack so that the world will collectively witness the nuclear detonation on live on TV. Lastly, on August 6, 2015, it was reported that Russia is “strongly suspected” of the latest cyberattack on the Pentagon.

Russia Putin ISIS

5.2: Russia Terror Attacks
In the last 2-years, at least 5 terror-related incidents (see below) have either been committed by Russian terrorists and/or the Russia government. Whether or not these Russian-based terror attacks will commence with a Russian terror attacks against NATO countries is not known, but it’s highly likely. Said attacks will likely transpire a few days prior to a full-scale nuclear attack by Russia. The notion that terror attacks are now in play for NATO was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, on June 22, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide commandos to NATO. Translation: Special Forces (i.e., professional terrorists) will be used to commit terror attacks in NATO countries (e.g., Lithuania, Poland, etc.). This notion that Russian-based terrorism is imminent was confirmed on June 5, 2015, when it was reported that a 19-year old Russian girl was an ISIS recruit. The girl was reportedly one 13 Russians who were on their way to join ISIS in Syria. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 17, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Pentagon Trained ISIS Unleashed on Russia”, associating Russia with ISIS just prior to state-sponsored Islamic terror attacks in NATO countries. That same day, June 17, 2015, Moscow reportedly launches an anti-ISIS training program for Russian imams, further associating Russia with ISIS just prior to Islamic terror attacks against NATO. Once a war between the U.S. and a Russia commences, it’s highly likely that the creation and funding of ISIS will be blamed on Russia, instead of the CIA in Switzerland where it belongs.

Russian Terror Timeline
:

1. April 15, 2013: Russian Brothers Tsarnaev Execute Boston Marathon Bombings (Boston, MA)
2. December 29, 2013: 14 Dead after Suicide Bombing at Russia Railway Station (Volgograd, Russia)
3. December 30, 2014: Second Suicide Bomber hits Russian City, 14 Killed (Volgograd, Russia)
4. January 25, 2014: Russian Teen Charged in US with Weapon of Mass Destruction (Altoona, PA)
5. August 8, 2015: Jury convicts Russian commander of terror-related charges (Richmond, VA)
6. August 12, 2015: US jury convicts Uzbek refugee of 3 terrorism-related charges (Boise, ID)

[Does not purport to be a complete list of Russian-related terror attacks]

VI. WORLD WAR III FLASHPOINTS:

6.1: Global Flashpoints
Whenever blood must be spilled by the CIA, disputed areas like Crimea (Eastern Europe), Jerusalem (Middle East), Kashmir (Central Asia) or the Senkaku Islands (Asia) are suddenly inflamed by the CIA through the television channels which they control outright. Consequently, politicians, soldiers and militaries equipment are moved like pawns in the global scheme run by the Swiss CIA. In respect to the impending World War III scenario between the U.S. and Russia, Truther.org has identified 4 flashpoints that may suffer an attack, invasion or nuclear strike.

6.2: Poland
The notion that NATO and Russia are about to go to war was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO. Three days later on June 10, 2015, NATO started “very high readiness” war games in Poland, providing a timely motive for a Russian-based attack. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. The CIA-spawned hoax was a publicity stunt designed to provide another timely motive for a Russian-based attack on NATO. Three days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now win talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe, posing a direct threat to Russia. The notion of Russian tanks rolling into Poland was ominously foreshadowed on June 14, 2015, when the Sunday Times published a report entitled “German Tanks Roll Back into Poland”. Similar to the invasion of Crimea, the impending invasion of Poland will be used to sell the notion of a new Cold War between Russia and the West. In order to provide another blatant motive for a Russian attack on Poland, it was reported on June 14, 2015, that Poland has erected observation towers on its border with Russia. The red-and-white metal radio-tower-like structures are reportedly equipped with cameras, rising up to 164 feet. A day later on June 15, 2015, it was confirmed that the U.S. will store heavy weapons in Poland under NATO’s new plan, proving yet another motive for a Russian-based attack on Poland, Islamic terrorist or otherwise. Lastly, the notion that Russia is planning a retaliatory attack on NATO was all but confirmed on June 16, 2015, when it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep in Poland. Consequently, an Islamic and/or Russian based attack is expected.

6.3: Sweden
Aside from being an active participant in numerous NATO war games, Sweden borders Russia to the West and therefore is the most likely of the Western European countries to suffer a direct attack or invasion by Russia. Although a nuclear strike on Sweden is highly unlikely, a bio-terror attack is a far more realistic possibility, possibly sparking the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. The notion of a Sweden-based bio-terror attack was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when it was reported that migrant beggars in Sweden were attacked with acid. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO.

Putin Crimea

6.4: Ukraine
Considering that Ukraine, a NATO nation, was already invaded by Russia during the crisis in Crimea, it’s the most likely country in Europe to suffer a Russian attack and secondary invasion. Based on recent news in respect to both Ukraine and nuclear warfare, a nuclear strike in Ukraine now appears to be in order. This particular narrative was first identified back on March 15, 2015, when Putin stated that Russia was preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary” while simultaneously blaming the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Ukraine. Roughly a month later on April 28, 2015, it was reported that forest fires were heading for Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine. Roughly a month later on June 5, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Kiev to Allow Foreign Armed Forces in Ukraine, incl. ‘Potential Carriers of Nukes’”. These 4 reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based nuclear strike on Ukraine is imminent. The nuclear attack will likely happen just prior to, during, or right after the U.S. led NATO invasion of Ukraine. In order to foreshadow further Russian aggression in Ukraine, CNN published a report on June 11, 2015, entitled “U.S. Ambassador to U.N. Visits Ukraine, Slams Russian ‘Aggression’”. Four days later on June 15, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, starting that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. In a clear sign that war in Ukraine is imminent, it was reported on June 18, 2015, that Iraq War criminal Tony Blair will take on an advisory role in Ukraine. Three days later on June 21, 2015, Ukraine’s Right Sector rejects the Minsk deal, calling for a renewed offensive in Ukraine. The notion that war is about to break out in Ukraine was confirmed on June 22, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S. will provide weapons for NATO commandos to attack Ukrainian separatists. That same day, June 22, 2015, it was also reported that a member of Kiev’s top brass ‘defects’ to anti-government forces. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the traitorous general will lead the opposition to Russia in the coming war. A day later on June 23, 2015, the Guardian published a report entitled “EU Extends Sanctions against Russia as Ukraine Conflict Rumbles On”. Although the conflict in Ukraine has been dormant for months, it apparently going to get a shot in the arm. Lastly, in what appears to be pre-nuclear terror programming for Ukraine, it was reported on August 6, 2015, that ISIS uranium smugglers were busted in special op in western Ukraine. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a WMD-related attack in Ukraine is imminent.

VII. WORLD WAR III ENDGAME:

henry-gruver-russian-invasion-of-america-last-days

7.1: World War III Endgame
In the wake of Russian nuclear attacks in Ukraine or elsewhere, a European Union-type of army will likely be formed to counter Russia. This particular notion was foreshadowed back on March 8, 2015, it was reported that the current President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, called for the creation of EU army. Russian nuclear attacks in Eastern Europe will also provide the Swiss government the political capital it needs to drastically change their current asylum and immigration laws, likely resulting in the immediate removal of all European Union citizens, whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor included. Draconian changes to Swiss asylum and immigration law will predictably result in Taylor’s deportation and subsequent assassination, which is exactly why the CIA in Switzerland is now targeting Europe with Russian nuclear strikes. The notion that Switzerland will deport foreigners was foreshadowed by The Local back on June 19, 2015, when they published a report entitled “Russian Crisis Threatens 40,000 Swiss Jobs”. In the United States, nuclear war will lead to martial law as well as the naked dictatorship of one Barack Hussein Obama. As dictator, Obama will execute Rex 84, a classified government scenario that features a military dictatorship in order to carry out the industrial slaughter of millions of Americans.

7.2: Nuclear Cold War
In the wake of Russian nuclear attack in Ukraine or elsewhere, Putin will predictably blame the U.S. and Obama will predictably blame Russia. This will of course escalate tensions between the two nations which will eventually lead to a new nuclear Cold War. A new and improved U.S. versus Russia feud is coincidentally the theme of the televisions show entitled “The Americans” (2013), as well as the new television mini-series entitled “The Assets” (see trailer) which premiered in the U.S. on January 2, 2014.

About the Author
David Chase Taylor is an American journalist and the editor-in-chief of Truther.org, a state-sponsored terror whistle-blower website. Taylor currently lives in Switzerland where he applied for political asylum on July 17, 2015. Taylor authored The Nuclear Bible, a book credited with foiling a nuclear terror attack upon Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011, and Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now, a book and website exposing the true power structure of the world, especially in respect to Greenland and its primary proxy state of Switzerland which is coincidentally home to the CIA. Taylor has also published The Bio-Terror Bible, a book and website exposing the global bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. To date, Taylor has blown the whistle on over 100 state-sponsored terror plots, including the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror Plot, the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the Terrorgate Scandal, the 2014 Memorial Day Massacre, the man-made asteroid attack planned for 2015, and the drone strike which killed “Fast and Furious” star Paul Walker. Taylor was also the first to expose Alex Jones’ treacherous links to STRATFOR and is noted for the 10 reasons why the Rosetta Comet landing was a hoax.

READ: World’s ‘Most Wanted’ Whistle-Blower Journalist David Chase Taylor Applies for Political Asylum in Switzerland

Truther.org Legal Disclaimer
Truther.org’s stated purpose is to stop terrorism by drawing unwanted global attention to terror plots prior to their fruition. Terror alerts and warnings made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility that they may occur based on breaking terror-related news, events and data. Historically speaking, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed, it is immediately canceled, postponed, or reworked (e.g., the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Freedom Tower Nuclear Terror Plot, etc.). State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats, create plausible deniability, and mislead the public from the usual suspects of terror which work at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland. Please support real citizen journalism and help make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste

0001 SAFDCT
customLogo.gif
truther-rss

World War III US & Russia

Download & Forward PDF

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Because I, David Chase Taylor, am currently in the process of applying for political asylum in Switzerland (which is coincidentally home to the CIA), the state-sponsored terror plots and so-called “natural disasters” I expose rarely come to fruition. In short, the Swiss CIA does not want to afford me any more credibility or publicity than they have to, lest they turn me into a modern-day prophet. They also do not want to provide yet another open-and-shut case as to why I deserve political asylum. For those wondering why I would apply for political asylum in Switzerland, consider this: a) I originally applied for asylum in Switzerland on March 8, 2011, roughly 2-years before I discovered that Switzerland was harboring the CIA; and b) the CIA has historically not shat were it eats in Switzerland. That being said, the CIA has now been exposed for the first time in history. Consequently, they are extremely desperate and may assassinate me Switzerland.

ISIS ENDGAME: How and Why the CIA in Switzerland Created ISIS as Cover for Nuclear and Biological Terror Attacks

RED ALERT: 10 Reasons Why Switzerland is Home to the CIA

David Chase Taylor
June 29, 2015
Truther.org

SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Ever since Truther.org revealed that the CIA in Switzerland created ISIS as political cover for nuclear and biological terror attacks, the Swiss CIA has been grooming Russia for nuclear and biological attacks that will predictably lead to World War III.

Since the 700-year cover of the CIA in Switzerland was officially blown for the first time in history by whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor in his shocking new book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014), the Swiss CIA is beyond desperate to start World War III.

In other words, the Swiss CIA is desperately trying to trigger a nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia so that information about Switzerland’s secret role as the progenitor of assassinations, terror attacks and wars will be lost in the aftermath of World War III.

Consequently, the Swiss CIA is now in a race against time to destroy the world as we know with U.S. and Russian nuclear attacks in a last-ditch effort to cover-up the news that the CIA is located in Switzerland, the eye of the storm which has been free of terror attacks and war for over 500-years.

It is imperative to note that NATO, Russia, and the United States are under the command and control of the CIA in Switzerland, all of which are indirectly funded by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland.

Although Switzerland is publically calling for a nuclear-free world, they are secretly setting up the United States and Russia for World War III that will likely be sparked by a false-flag attack or invasion in Alaska, Poland, Sweden and/or Ukraine. In the event that World War III commences Switzerland is ultimately responsible.

Obama Putin

World War III Propaganda
Prior to World War III between the U.S. and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, U.S. versus Russia propaganda is now at an all-time high which suggests that a false-flag attack that triggers a nuclear World War III is imminent. This particular narrative was first identified by Truther.org back on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea, causing the Russian defense minister to state that the incident “pose[d] a danger to strategic stability” between the two countries. Roughly a week later on June 8, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Russia has Better Things To Do than Start WW3”, raising the notion of World War III involving Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations visited Ukraine, slamming Russian ‘aggression’. The timely comment foreshadows a Russian-based attack on Ukraine, one which may be nuclear in nature. Five days later on June 16, 2015, Russia herself warned of a “new military confrontation” in Europe, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia will be at war in Europe in the near future. A day later on June 17, 2015, CNN published a report entitled “U.S.-Russia Military Tit for Tat Raises Fears of Greater Conflict”, suggesting that a local U.S.-Russian conflict could translate into World War III. Lastly, on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III between the U.S. and Russia.

Close Calls
Aside from the aforementioned World War III rhetoric and propaganda, there have been a number of close calls which have set the scene for a military showdown between the United States and Russia. One of these incidents could be misinterpreted (purposely of course) which could translate into a hot war between Russia and U.S. and NATO forces. The first close call between the U.S. and Russia was reported on May 31, 2015, when Russian military jets and a U.S. destroyer clashed in Black Sea. The incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia naval conflict in the Black Sea. This notion is confirmed by NATO war games ongoing in the Black Sea. A day later on June 1, 2015, it was reported that Russian and U.S. planes had a close encounter near Crimea, foreshadowing an aerial-related conflict between the two countries. Again, the incident was likely staged or fabricated in order to set the precedent for a U.S. versus Russia conflict in Ukraine. Nine days later on June 10, 2015, it was reported that a Russian jet reportedly harassed U.S. reconnaissance plane, otherwise known as a spy plane. According to reports, the Russian Su-27 fighters reportedly intercepted a US RC-135 intelligence aircraft on May 30, 2015. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a similar incident will lead to a full-scale war between the U.S. and Russia.

Putin Nuke Nuclear

Russian Nuclear Terror Attack
Exactly one month before the aforementioned book “Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now” (2014) was published on December 21, 2014, Forbes published a report on November 21, 2014, entitled “Does Russia Think Their New Nuclear Weapons Could Win A War?”. This was the first-ever report identified by Truther.org which foreshadowed an unprecedented and unprovoked nuclear strike by Russia. Ever since revelations where made public that Switzerland harbors the CIA, the international media (which operates at the behest of the CIA) has been inundated with the Russian nuclear attack narrative. For example, it was reported back on March 15, 2015, that Vladimir Putin stated that Russia is preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary”. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin again threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Crimea in Ukraine. It is imperative to note that the latter two reports invoking Ukraine and a nuclear attack are key because aside from the United States, Ukraine is most likely NATO country to suffer a Russian nuclear strike. Roughly a month later on May 1, 2015, it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska, conforming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing a nuclear strike. Roughly 4-weeks later on May 27, 2015, a NATO general warned that Russian President Putin is a “dangerous gambler…willing to use nuclear weapons”, an apparent preview of things to come. The notion of a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia was foreshadowed in a Russia Today report from June 7, 2015, entitled “UK Could Host US Nukes to Counter Increased ‘Russian Activity’”, as well as a Telegraph report entitled “Nuclear Missiles Could be Sited Again on British Soil in New ‘Cold War’ with Russia”. In what appears to be an ominous sign of things to come, the Daily Star published a report on June 8, 2015, entitled “Armageddon Strikes: Massive Cloud Sparks Russian Nuclear Attack Panic”. A day later on June 9, 2015, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt was enacted by intelligence operative Mark Dice who created a petition to nuke Russia. Three days later on June 11, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “US and Russia ‘Playing Nuclear Chicken with Each Other’”, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that nuclear war between the two nations is imminent. A day later on June 12, 2015, it was reported that people in Moscow widely oppose the fake petition to nuke America, further raising the specter of nuclear war between the two countries. Four days later on June 16, 2015, Russian President Putin reportedly stated that Russia will get 40 new intercontinental missiles this year, all of which are nuclear in nature. Four days later on June 17, 2015, Kremlin officials stated that Russia’s nuclear buildup is being forced by the West. Three days later on June 20, 2015, Putin stated that the world was no closer to Cold War-style nuclear standoff, raising the notion of a nuclear confrontation just prior to its fruition in reality. Three days later on June 23, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “The Pentagon Goes Nuclear on Russia” which stated that Russian submarines off the coast of America could engage in a “nuclear turkey shoot”, knocking out every major American city within a few minutes. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles which travel through space. Lastly, on June 25, 2015, Reuters published a report entitled “Russia ‘Playing with Fire’ with Nuclear Saber-Rattling”, further inferring that a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and Russia is now in play by the CIA.

Russian Bio-Terror Attack
Although a Russian-based nuclear attack are the most likely scenario, there is also the chance that the Swiss CIA could spark a biological pandemic in Europe during the impending conflict between the U.S. and Russia. How this bio-terror pandemic will manifest is not yet known, but it has been foreshadowed in the news nonetheless. For example, on June 5, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Expert Predicts Anthrax Attacks Will Be Used to Push Russian War”, consummating the terms Anthrax and Russia within the same headlines. Ten days later on June 15, 2015, Infowars published another report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, stating that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. Needless to say, one of these bio-labs in Eastern Europe could be directly attacked or suffer collateral damage, leading to a biological outbreak that could spark the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015.

I. ALL THE WORLD IS A STAGE:

BIS (2)

1.1: US & Russia Funded by BIS in Switzerland
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland is the financial backbone of the CIA in Switzerland which secretly funds its black operations around the world. In short, the BIS funds 60 central banks which are collectively responsible for 95% of the world’s GDP, making it the sole progenitor of the world’s fiat money supply. These central banks include the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States which funds the U.S. government and her military, and the Bank of Russia which funds the Russian government and her military. Consequently, all monies allocated to the U.S. and Russia for World War III originated from the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland which, aside from Vatican City, is the only country to bear a sovereign flag. Consequently, the United States and Russia do not have sovereign flags, meaning that they are not in control of their own destiny nor their own respective militaries.

PutinObama2013G20Summit640

1.2: Presidential Puppets Obama & Putin
Since both U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin are puppets of the CIA, they have no real power and only act when told to do so. In other words, neither of them is actually in charge; they are just political puppets posing for the cameras. However, in order to create the public perception that the beef between the U.S. and Russia is real, Obama reportedly urged G7 leaders to maintain the sanctions on Russia while simultaneously admitting that they don’t work. A day later on June 6, 2015, Putin reportedly stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. The premediated soundbite was given in order to create the perception that Putin is crazy, especially in the aftermath of unprovoked nuclear strikes against the U.S. and NATO. Lastly, it was reported on June 24, 2015, that Putin’s approval rating is at an historic high at 89%, inferring that virtually all of Russia supports his reckless policy. In the aftermath of a nuclear World War III, Putin will be blamed rather that the CIA who orchestrated the nuclear conflict to begin with.

II. PRE-WORLD WAR III PROGRAMMING:

2.1: World War III Saber Rattling
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the world must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Fraudulent headlines and fabricated events are a slick way of convincing people that yes, it can happen. As evidenced, saber rattling between the NATO nations and Russia is currently at an all-time high which suggests that a real world attack between the two nations is imminent. Aside from the fact that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska on May 1, 2015, Russia instituted a travel ban against EU officials on May 31, 2015. Less than a week later on June 5, 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military training and exercises to counter Russia. A day later on June 6, 2015, a government reported stated that the U.S. is now considering a harder stance on Russia, one that will predictably lead to war. Two days later on June 7, 2015, U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO, suggesting that an armed conflict is only a matter of time. Less than 48-hours later on June 9, 2015, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush called for a tougher policy toward Russia and Putin. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015, a top Russian security official reportedly stated that the “U.S. would like Russia to cease to exist as a country”, a declaration of war if there ever was one. Lastly, that same day, June 22, 2015, the Independent published a report entitled “Russia ‘Aggression’: US Nuclear Missile Commander says Vladimir Putin’s Actions Echo Those of Nazi Germany in the 1930s”, a report evidently designed to invoke a Russian attack and invasion that may be nuclear in nature. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

2.2: Motives for a Russian Attack
In order to create the necessary narrative in the media prior to unprovoked Russian nuclear strikes against NATO nations, a number of timely motives have been created by the Swiss CIA. For example, on May 31, 2015, it was reported that Russian President Putin was shut out from the G7 Meeting for the second year running. Less than 2-weeks later on June 10, 2015, the United States reportedly overtook Russia as the world’s top oil and gas producer. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. Roughly a week later on June 19, 2015, the EU Parliament voted to prolong economic sanctions against Crimea till June 2016. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, have given Russia at least 4 motives for an attack against NATO, one which may be nuclear in nature.

2.3: Russian Threats
Prior to a World War III between the U.S. and Russia, a number of threats must be leveled from both sides in order to give the perception that the conflict is real and not being orchestrated by the CIA in Switzerland. The first threat was identified on May 8, 2015, when it was reported that Russia intends to restore a spy base in Cuba, some 90 miles from American shores. That same day, May 8, 2015, Russian students projected a Russian-based tank attack on the White House, a CIA-spawned publicity stunt designed to foreshadow a Russian attack on America. Roughly a month later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep. Since NATO is currently moving military equipment to its border with Russia, a Russian attack is forthcoming. Three days later on June 19, 2015, Russian President Putin stated that no one should talk to Russia through ultimatums, inferring that he will no longer be subjugated by the West. That same day, June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO, an off-handed threat to Ukraine which did in fact join NATO. Lastly, on June 23, 2015, a senior Russian diplomat stated that Russia will longer accept lectures from the United States. The timely comments were designed to show that Russia feels belittled by NATO and may lash out, possibly with nuclear strikes. Needless to say, these threats, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

III. WORLD WAR III ARMS BUILDUP:

Russia Putin

3.1: Russian Military Buildup
Prior to the start of World War III, Russia must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 15, 2015, when it was reported that Russia may beef up its border if U.S. military arms are stationed in Eastern Europe. Since U.S. arms are now flowing into NATO countries such as Poland, it can be assumed that Russia has made good on its promise. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was Russian President Putin stated that Russia will get 40 new nuclear intercontinental missiles this year, an ominous sign that nuclear war is imminent. Less than 24-hours later on June 17, 2015, it was reported that the Russian military is developing an anti-drone microwave gun. The timely propaganda report was designed to associate an aerial aircraft (drone) with radiation (microwave) just prior to nuclear airstrikes by Russia, most likely in America and/or Eastern Europe. Lastly, that same day, June 17, 2015, Russia showed off its news military equipment and vehicles at Army 2015 Expo near Moscow, a flexing of the Russian military muscle if you will. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that a conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

nato2

3.2: US & NATO Military Buildup

Prior to the start of World War III, NATO must first strengthen its military with soldiers and weapons for the impending conflict. This particular narrative was first identified back on June 4, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S, may deploy missiles in Europe to counter Russia. Ten days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now in talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe. That same day, June 14, 2015, it was reported that Poland and Lithuania discussing plans with the U.S. to harbor military equipment. Said talks became reality a day later on June 15, 2015, when the Pentagon reportedly sent heavy military equipment to Eastern Europe. A day later on June 16, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. Air Force may send F-22s to Europe over the “threat” from Russia. The massive military escalation in Eastern Europe was confirmed on June 18, 2015, when it was reported that NATO is conducting the biggest beef up of defenses since the Cold War. That same day, June 18, 2015, it was also reported that the Pentagon is now building a cruise missile shield to defend U.S. cities from Russia, confirming, albeit in a de facto manner, that U.S. cities will be attacked by Russian missiles, most likely nuclear in nature. Four days later on June 22, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “NATO Heavy Weapons Fueling World War III, conforming that the massive NATO arms buildup on Russia’s border will in fact lead to World War III. The ongoing NATO buildup of weapons was confirmed yet again on June 5, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S must boost military aid to NATO to counter Russia. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 22, 2015: Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide weapons, aircraft and commandos to NATO. A day later on June 23, 2015, it was reported that the Pentagon is rushing to open a new Space-War Center to counter Russia, a report designed to invoke the notion of Russian-based intercontinental ballistic nuclear missiles. That same day, June 23, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. military is now moving tanks and other equipment to allied nations near the Russian border, including but not limited to: 250 military vehicles and Abrams tanks. Needless to say, these reports, taken collectively, suggest that an armed conflict between NATO and Russia is imminent.

3.3: Black Sea Naval Buildup
In order to create the scene for a spectacular World War III battle between the U.S. and Russia, both sides must get their aircraft and ships in position prior an attack. Aside from the USS Taylor (FFG-50) and the USS Mount Whitney (LCC-20) which were originally stationed in the Black Sea during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, the U.S. has also sent the USS Truxtun to the Black Sea which is part of the USS George H.W. Bush strike group stationed in Mediterranean. On the Russian side, there are a total of 7 ships in the Black Sea. According to a March 5, 2014 report, two Russian warships have now entered the Black Sea through the Bosphorus en route to Crimea. The 150 ‘Saratov’ landing ship and the 156 ‘Yamal’ assault ship will reportedly join five other Russian naval ships which are currently stationed in the port city of Sevastopol which is adjacent to Crimea. These ships include the 30th Surface Ship Division, the 41st Missile Boat Brigade, the 247th Separate Submarine Division, the 68th Harbor Defense Ship, and the 422nd Separate Hydrographic Ship Division. In total, there are at least 11 ships in or near the Black Sea.

IV. WORLD WAR III WAR GAMES:

putin-binoculars-AP

4.1: Russian War Games
Prior to World War III between NATO and Russia, the Russian military must get their soldiers and equipment ready for battle. War games are in essence practice for war and they have been occurring at an alarming rate. The notion that Russia is actively training for an attack on NATO was first identified back on March 7, 2014, when the Pentagon confirmed that Russian is now conducting air defense drills that will conclude with live fire exercise. Two days later on March 9, 2015, it was reported that Russian jets are practicing “attack scenarios” on NATO ships, further foreshadowing a Russian-based attack, possibly nuclear in nature. Roughly a month later on April 30, 2015, it was reported that Russia and China will hold their first-ever joint naval drills in the Mediterranean in May 2015. Lastly, on May 25, 2015, it was reported that Russia launched a massive air force exercise with 250 aircraft, further foreshadowing the notion of a Russian-based aerial attack. Considering that war games have a tendency to go live, an armed conflict between NATO and Russia could commence at any time.

VER50217088. DEMOSTRACION DE DESEMBARQUE ANFIBIO Y VERTICAL POR PERSONAL DE LA FUERZA NAVAL DE GOLFO, AL PRESIDENTE VICENTE FOX QUESADA, EN SU GIRA POR EL SALADO, MUNICIPIO DE ALVARADO, VERACRUZ.  NOTIMEX/FOTO/GUSTAVO BENITEZ/GBH/POL/

4.2: US & NATO War Games
Prior to World War III between the United States and Russia, the U.S. and NATO must get their soldiers and equipment ready for battle. War games are in essence practice for war and they have been occurring at an alarming rate. The notion that the U.S. and NATO are actively training for an attack on Russia was first identified back on March 9, 2015, when it was revealed that 3,000 U.S, troops are headed to Eastern Europe for military exercises. Roughly 3-months later on June 5, 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter stated that the U.S. must boost military exercises in Europe to counter Russia. Participating members in the following 7 NATO war games include but are not limited to: Belgium, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, NATO, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Considering that war games have a tendency to go live, an armed conflict between NATO and Russia could commence at any time.

A. ‘Locked Shields 2015’
The NATO war game “Locked Shields 2015” was executed on April 20-25, 2015. The drills reportedly involved 400 people from 16 countries. Based on the plethora of Russian-based cyber-attacks, the drills appears to be preparation for a far deadlier cyber-attack that will predictably be scapegoated onto Russia

B. ‘Siil-2015’ aka ‘Hedgehog’
The NATO war game Siil-2015 or “Hedgehog” was the “largest-ever” military drills in Estonia which concluded on May 15, 2015. The drill reportedly involved 13,000 military forces from Belgium, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, NATO, the Netherlands, Poland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

C. ‘Zaibo Kirtis’ aka ‘Lightning Strike’
The NATO war game “Lightning Strike” or “Zaibo Kirtis”, which reportedly involved over 3,000 troops, was largest drills ever executed by Lithuanian Army. The drill focused on joint action by the army and civilian authorities against so-called hybrid threats combining both military and non-military methods of fighting.

D. ‘Dynamic Mongoose’
The NATO war game “Dynamic Mongoose” is an annual NATO anti-submarine exercise involving Norway, Germany, Sweden and the United States. About 5,000 servicemen from 10 NATO countries took part in the drills that employs the use of sub hunts, surface vessels, aircraft and a variety of radar and sonar technologies.

E. ‘Nobel Jump 2’
The NATO war game “Nobel Jump 2” concluded on June 19, 2015, in Poland. The drills featured some 2,100 soldiers from nine NATO states, including soldiers from the “Very High Readiness Joint Task Force” (VJTF) which was created at the 2014 NATO Summit in response to a perceived threat from Russia. The Noble Jump exercise was first time that high-readiness units are being deployed under the new VJTF framework.

F. ‘Allied Shield’
The NATO war game “Allied Shield” concluded on June 20, 2015. The drills reportedly involved some 15,000 troops from 19 allied states and three partner nations.

G. ‘BALTOPS’
The NATO war game “BALTOPS” concluded on June 20, 2015. The drills, which reportedly involved some 50 vessels from 17 countries and 5,600 troops, featured anti-submarine warfare, air defense, interception of suspect vessels and amphibious landings.

H. ‘Northern Edge 2015’
The U.S. military war game “Northern Edge 2015” was executed in June of 2015. The drills, which reportedly involved more than 200 aircraft and 6,000 U.S. soldiers from all four branches of the military, featured naval exercises in the Gulf of Alaska, as well as the deployment of ground troops.

V: WHEN RUSSIA ATTACKS
:

Putin Russia

5.1: Russian Attacks
In order to set the precedent for an unprecedented nuclear attack by Russia, a narrative has been created in the media by the Swiss CIA that Russia is responsible for a wave of cyber-attacks against the United States, setting the precedent for a far greater attack. This particular narrative was first identified back on January 18, 2014, when it was reported that Russia created the ‘BlackPOS Malware’ to hack Target and Neiman Marcus. Roughly 3-months later on April 8, 2015, it was reported that Russia hacked the Obama White House. Roughly 2-weeks later on April 23, 2015, it was revealed that Russians hacked the Pentagon’s network. Two days later on April 25, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers read Obama’s unclassified emails. Roughly 3-weeks later on May 14, 2015, it was reported that Russian hackers are now targeting U.S. banks. Less than 2-week later on May 27, 2015, it was reported that the IRS now believes that a recent cyberattack on its network originated in Russia. The notion of a Russia-based attack was foreshadowed by Russian President Putin on June 6, 2015, when he stated that “Russia would attack NATO only in mad person’s dream”. Lastly, on June 9, 2015, it was reported that the television station ‘TV5 Monde’ was attack by Russia-based hackers. In the event that Russia launches nuclear strikes against NATO, the world’s TV stations will likely be simultaneously hijacked by a cyber-attack so that the world will collectively witness the nuclear detonation on live on TV.

5.2: Russia Terror Attacks
In the last 2-years, at least 5 terror-related incidents (see below) have either been committed by Russian terrorists and/or the Russia government. Whether or not these Russian-based terror attacks will commence with a Russian terror attacks against NATO countries is not known, but it’s highly likely. Said attacks will likely transpire a few days prior to a full-scale nuclear attack by Russia. The notion that terror attacks are now in play for NATO was confirmed, albeit in a de facto manner, on June 22, 2015, when U.S. Secretary of Defense Carter confirmed that the U.S. will provide commandos to NATO. Translation: Special Forces (i.e., professional terrorists) will be used to commit terror attacks in NATO countries (e.g., Lithuania, Poland, etc.). This notion that Russian-based terrorism is imminent was confirmed on June 5, 2015, when it was reported that a 19-year old Russian girl was an ISIS recruit. The girl was reportedly one 13 Russians who were on their way to join ISIS in Syria. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 17, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Pentagon Trained ISIS Unleashed on Russia”, associating Russia with ISIS just prior to state-sponsored Islamic terror attacks in NATO countries. That same day, June 17, 2015, Moscow reportedly launches an anti-ISIS training program for Russian imams, further associating Russia with ISIS just prior to Islamic terror attacks against NATO. Once a war between the U.S. and a Russia commences, it’s highly likely that the creation and funding of ISIS will be blamed on Russia, instead of the CIA in Switzerland where it belongs.

Russian Terror Timeline
:

1. April 15, 2013: Russian Brothers Tsarnaev Execute Boston Marathon Bombings (Boston, MA)
2. December 29, 2013: 14 Dead after Suicide Bombing at Russia Railway Station (Volgograd, Russia)
3. December 30, 2014: Second Suicide Bomber hits Russian City, 14 Killed (Volgograd, Russia)
4. January 25, 2014: Russian Teen Charged in US with Weapon of Mass Destruction (Altoona, PA)

VI. ORLD WAR III FLASHPOINTS:

6.1: Global Flashpoints
Whenever blood must be spilled by the CIA, disputed areas like Crimea (Eastern Europe), Jerusalem (Middle East), Kashmir (Central Asia) or the Senkaku Islands (Asia) are suddenly inflamed by the CIA through the television channels which they control outright. Consequently, politicians, soldiers and militaries equipment are moved like pawns in the global scheme run by the Swiss CIA. In respect to the impending World War III scenario between the U.S. and Russia, Truther.org has identified 4 flashpoints that may suffer an attack, invasion or nuclear strike.

Russia Nuclear Bomber

6.2: Alaska
Since Alaska borders Russia to the East, it is the most likely region of the United States to suffer a direct attack or invasion. This particular notion was foreshadowed back on May 1, 2015, when it was reported that Russia conducted a nuclear bomber flight near Alaska, conforming, albeit in a de facto manner, that Russia is actively practicing a nuclear strike, possibly on Alaska. The U.S. war game “Northern Edge 2015” was also executed in Alaska in June of 2015. The drills reportedly involved more than 200 aircraft and 6,000 U.S. soldiers from all four branches of the military.

6.3: Poland
The notion that NATO and Russia are about to go to war was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey stated that Russian President Putin intends to undermine NATO. Three days later on June 10, 2015, NATO started “very high readiness” war games in Poland, providing a timely motive for a Russian-based attack. Less than 24-hours later on June 11, 2015, it was reported that a Lithuanian army website hack hoax revealed “NATO plans to annex Russia’s Kaliningrad”. The CIA-spawned hoax was a publicity stunt designed to provide another timely motive for a Russian-based attack on NATO. Three days later on June 14, 2015, it was reported that the U.S. and Poland are now win talks to deploy weapons in Eastern Europe, posing a direct threat to Russia. The notion of Russian tanks rolling into Poland was ominously foreshadowed on June 14, 2015, when the Sunday Times published a report entitled “German Tanks Roll Back into Poland”. Similar to the invasion of Crimea, the impending invasion of Poland will be used to sell the notion of a new Cold War between Russia and the West. In order to provide another blatant motive for a Russian attack on Poland, it was reported on June 14, 2015, that Poland has erected observation towers on its border with Russia. The red-and-white metal radio-tower-like structures are reportedly equipped with cameras, rising up to 164 feet. A day later on June 15, 2015, it was confirmed that the U.S. will store heavy weapons in Poland under NATO’s new plan, proving yet another motive for a Russian-based attack on Poland, Islamic terrorist or otherwise. Lastly, the notion that Russia is planning a retaliatory attack on NATO was all but confirmed on June 16, 2015, when it was reported that Russia “will retaliate” if U.S. tanks and heavy weapons are placed on its doorstep in Poland. Consequently, an Islamic and/or Russian based attack is expected.

6.4: Sweden
Aside from being an active participant in numerous NATO war games, Sweden borders Russia to the West and therefore is the most likely of the Western European countries to suffer a direct attack or invasion by Russia. Although a nuclear strike on Sweden is highly unlikely, a bio-terror attack is a far more realistic possibility, possibly sparking the bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. The notion of a Sweden-based bio-terror attack was ominously foreshadowed back on June 7, 2015, when it was reported that migrant beggars in Sweden were attacked with acid. Roughly 2-weeks later on June 19, 2015, Russia warned Sweden that it will face military action if it joins NATO.

Putin Crimea

6.5: Ukraine
Considering that Ukraine, a NATO nation, was already invaded by Russia during the crisis in Crimea, it’s the most likely country in Europe to suffer a Russian attack and secondary invasion. Based on recent news in respect to both Ukraine and nuclear warfare, a nuclear strike in Ukraine now appears to be in order. This particular narrative was first identified back on March 15, 2015, when Putin stated that Russia was preparing to use nuclear weapons “if necessary” while simultaneously blaming the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine. Roughly 5-months later on April 2, 2015, Putin threatened nuclear war in order to drive NATO out of Baltics and defend Ukraine. Roughly a month later on April 28, 2015, it was reported that forest fires were heading for Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine. Roughly a month later on June 5, 2015, Russia Today published a report entitled “Kiev to Allow Foreign Armed Forces in Ukraine, incl. ‘Potential Carriers of Nukes’”. These 4 reports, taken collectively, suggest that a Russian-based nuclear strike on Ukraine is imminent. The nuclear attack will likely happen just prior to, during, or right after the U.S. led NATO invasion of Ukraine. In order to foreshadow further Russian aggression in Ukraine, CNN published a report on June 11, 2015, entitled “U.S. Ambassador to U.N. Visits Ukraine, Slams Russian ‘Aggression’”. Four days later on June 15, 2015, traitorous Infowars published a report entitled “Why Does Pentagon Need Laboratories in Ukraine?”, starting that the “next stage of development of Ukrainian democracy might be an accidental outbreak of a virus”. In a clear sign that war in Ukraine is imminent, it was reported on June 18, 2015, that Iraq War criminal Tony Blair will take on an advisory role in Ukraine. Three days later on June 21, 2015, Ukraine’s Right Sector rejects the Minsk deal, calling for a renewed offensive in Ukraine. The notion that war is about to break out in Ukraine was confirmed on June 22, 2015, when it was reported that the U.S. will provide weapons for NATO commandos to attack Ukrainian separatists. That same day, June 22, 2015, it was also reported that a member of Kiev’s top brass ‘defects’ to anti-government forces. Although only conjecture, it’s highly likely that the traitorous general will lead the opposition to Russia in the coming war. Lastly, on June 23, 2015, the Guardian published a report entitled “EU Extends Sanctions against Russia as Ukraine Conflict Rumbles On”. Although the conflict in Ukraine has been dormant for months, it apparently going to get a shot in the arm.

VII. WORLD WAR III ENDGAME:

40 Best 3D Fantasy Places HD Wallpapers 1920x1080

7.1: World War III Endgame
In the wake of Russian nuclear attacks in Ukraine or elsewhere, a European Union-type of army will likely be formed to counter Russia. This particular notion was foreshadowed back on March 8, 2015, it was reported that the current President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, called for the creation of EU army. Russian nuclear attacks in Eastern Europe will also provide the Swiss government the political capital it needs to drastically change their current asylum and immigration laws, likely resulting in the immediate removal of all European Union citizens, whistle-blower journalist David Chase Taylor included. Draconian changes to Swiss asylum and immigration law will predictably result in Taylor’s deportation and subsequent assassination, which is exactly why the CIA in Switzerland is now targeting Europe with Russian nuclear strikes. The notion that Switzerland will deport foreigners was foreshadowed by The Local back on June 19, 2015, when they published a report entitled “Russian Crisis Threatens 40,000 Swiss Jobs”. In the United States, nuclear war will lead to martial law as well as the naked dictatorship of one Barack Hussein Obama. As dictator, Obama will execute Rex 84, a classified government scenario that features a military dictatorship in order to carry out the industrial slaughter of millions of Americans.

7.2: Nuclear Cold War
In the wake of Russian nuclear attack in Ukraine or elsewhere, Putin will predictably blame the U.S. and Obama will predictably blame Russia. This will of course escalate tensions between the two nations which will eventually lead to a new nuclear Cold War. A new and improved U.S. versus Russia feud is coincidentally the theme of the televisions show entitled “The Americans” (2013), as well as the new television mini-series entitled “The Assets” (see trailer) which premiered in the U.S. on January 2, 2014.

About the Author
David Chase Taylor is an American journalist and the editor-in-chief of Truther.org, a state-sponsored terror whistle-blower website. Taylor lives in Zurich, Switzerland where he is currently in the process of applying for political asylum since the release of The Nuclear Bible, a book credited with foiling a nuclear terror attack upon Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011. Taylor recently authored Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now, a book and website exposing the true power structure of the world, especially in respect to Greenland and its primary proxy state of Switzerland which is home to the CIA. Taylor has also published The Bio-Terror Bible, a book and website exposing the global bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. To date, Taylor has blown the whistle on over 100 state-sponsored terror plots, including the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror Plot, the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the Terrorgate Scandal, the 2014 Memorial Day Massacre, the man-made asteroid attack planned for 2015, and the drone strike which killed “Fast and Furious” star Paul Walker. Taylor was also the first to expose Alex Jones’ treacherous links to STRATFOR and is noted for the 10 reasons why the Rosetta Comet landing was a hoax.

READ: In the Event of My Death Prior to July 19, 2015—An Open Letter by Journalist David Chase Taylor

Truther.org Legal Disclaimer
Truther.org’s stated purpose is to stop terrorism by drawing unwanted global attention to terror plots prior to their fruition. Terror alerts and warnings made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility that they may occur based on breaking terror-related news, events and data. Historically speaking, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed, it is immediately canceled, postponed, or reworked (e.g., the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Freedom Tower Nuclear Terror Plot, etc.). State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats, create plausible deniability, and mislead the public from the usual suspects of terror which work at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland. Please support real citizen journalism and help make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste

0001 SAFDCT
customLogo.gif
truther-rss