SWITZERLAND, Zurich — Based on breaking news and events, it appears that the CIA in Switzerland has ordered the Chinese government to execute a surprise attack upon the United States, most likely in Hawaii and/or California.
The impending Chinese attack will likely involve on or more of the following terror scenarios: a) a cyber-attack on U.S. military; b) a conventional nuclear attack; c) a TV-related cyber-hijack and subsequent nuclear attack; d) an EMP attack; and/or e) the full-scale Chinese invasion of Hawaii or mainland United States.
Exactly which combination of the aforementioned scenarios will be implemented is not known, but it will most likely involve a surprise Chinese attack on Naval Station Pearl Harbor followed by the full-scale Chinese invasion of Hawaii. Once China has the full attention of the world, they will likely execute an unprecedented TV-related cyber-attack which will show the world nuclear bombs detonating in Los Angeles.
The notion that the Chinese are plotting a nuclear attack on Los Angeles was openly flaunted back on October 31, 2013, when the Chinese government released nuclear blast map projections for the U.S. cities of Seattle and Los Angeles after they were struck by Chinese nuclear warheads.
As reported ad nausea, the Swiss CIA is actively attempting to trigger World War III between the U.S. and China. To date, at least 9 different of Chinese “surprise” attack plots have been identified and exposed by Truther.org, this being the latest.
In the wake of these various Chinese attack plots, roughly 60 Chinese officials suddenly died due to unnatural causes. Although impossible to confirm, it appears that these officials in China were executed due to their first-hand knowledge of the aforementioned war plots which were ultimately foiled.
California Nuclear Attack Drills
In what appears to be the nuclear terror drills for a Chinese nuke attack upon Los Angeles, it was reported on April 1, 2015, that DHS executed a nuke attack drill on the US-Mexico border. According to reports, the exercise simulated “an emergency involving the detonation of a weapon of mass destruction near the U.S./Mexico border”. Authorities drilled on how they would deal with thousands of people crossing over from Mexico to escape the catastrophe, a scenario which would transpire in reality post-nuclear attack in Los Angeles. Two days later on April 3, 2015, it was revealed that a dirty bomb drill would be executed on April 11, 2015 involving hundreds of soldiers, airmen, police and fire officials. According to reports, the nuclear terror drill was executed in Richmond, California, just 381 miles north of Los Angles.
Top Chinese Attack Locations
Although a Pearl Harbor-like surprise attack against the United Stated by China could theoretically transpire in any American city or U.S. military base, the following seven location are the most likely due to their name recognition and close proximity to the Pacific Ocean.
Potential Chinese Attack Locations:
1. San Francisco, California
2. Seattle, Washington
3. Las Vegas, Nevada
4. Los Angeles, California
5. San Diego, California
6. Honolulu, Hawaii
7. Naval Station Pearl Harbor
U.S. vs. China Trending
Recent reports in respect to China suggest that they are about to strike the United States. For example, back on August 21, 2014, it was reported that a Chinese jet carried out an “aggressive” intercept of a U.S. Navy intelligence jet, a potential act of war. Two days later on August 23, 2014, it was reported that the U.S. sent a second aircraft carrier to Asia amid tensions with China. In the wake of a Chinese attack, the carrier deployment by Obama will likely be cited as the motive for the drone attack. Three days later on August 26, 2014, it was reported that a futuristic Chinese “supersonic” sub could reach America’s shores in less than two hours. The report was evidently designed to show that the Chinese can attack America whenever they want. A day later on August 27, 2014, it was reported that a Chinese fighter jet’s interception of a U.S. Navy sub-hunter aircraft was possibly triggered when the American plane dropped a sonar surveillance system into the South China Sea. The incident was designed to be a U.S. provocation that could theoretically be construed as an act of war. Lastly, on September 9, 2014, it was reported that U.S. National Security Adviser Susan Rice stated that China and the United States should avoid close calls between their respective militaries. The statement by Rice was evidently made in order to show that the U.S. and China are on thin ice and one event could trigger an all-out war between the two nuclear powers.
Surprise Attack Propaganda
Prior to a high-profile Asian based attack on the United States, the public must be psychologically prepared to accept that this is in fact possible. Hollywood movie propaganda is a slick way of showing that yes, it can happen. “Red Dawn” (2012) is a film (see trailer) in which the United States is the victim of a red-dawn surprise attack by military aircraft from North Korea. “Battleship” (2012) is another film (see trailer) in which the U.S. Navy and the State of Hawaii are the victims of a surprise attack, by transformer-like machines. “Olympus Has Fallen” (2013) is a film (see trailer) in which Washington D.C., is ambushed in a surprise attack by an ex-North Korean terrorists who employ military aircraft, suicide bombers and cyber-attacks in a bid to overthrow the U.S. government. “Pacific Rim” (2013) is a film (see trailer) which features a plot in which the U.S. is attacked by monster-like machines from deep under the Pacific Ocean. According to the trailer, the machines target San Francisco, California, Manila, Philippines, and Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, two of which are targets in reality. On May 16, 2014, “Godzilla” (2014) is a film (see trailer) which depicted an Asian-based monster who travels across the Pacific to attack the city of San Francisco. Interestingly, a day before the movie premiered, a San Francisco traffic sign was reportedly hacked to warn drivers of a “Godzilla Attack”. Exactly when this Asian “surprise” attack propaganda will manifest itself in reality is not known, but the masses have been conditioned for an attack on the West Coast of America, one which may transpire prior to during the 2014 RIMPAC Navel Exercise.
I. CHINESE CYBER-ATTACK:
1.1: Chinese Cyber-Attacks Trending
The notion that the Chinese government is actively hacking the U.S. military was confirmed back on September 18, 2014, when it was revealed by a U.S. Senate panel that the China has hacked U.S. military contractors. Roughly 2-months later on November 2, 2014, it was reported that China has successfully developed a laser-based drone defense system. The report was designed to show that China is actively developing drone system, one which will go offensive in the near future. A week later on November 9, 2014, it was reported that China will launch the world’s longest ‘hack-proof’ network by 2016, further tying China to hacking just prior to an unprecedented cyber-hijack of U.S. drones. Coincidentally, a day later on November 10, 2014, it was reported that the U.S. Postal Service confirmed a security breach and that the Chinese hackers are suspected. Three days later on November 12, 2014, the Chinese allegedly hacked U.S. weather systems as well as a satellite network. The wave of Chinese cyber-attacks is designed to show that Chinese cyber-related aggression is escalating. Lastly, on November 20, 2014, CNN published a report entitled “The U.S. Government Thinks China could take Down the Power Grid”. Needless to say, the timely propaganda report was designed to foreshadow a massive Chinese cyber-attack on the United States not only possible but imminent.
1.2: U.S. Vulnerable to Cyber-Attack
In what appears to be a warning of a Chinese attack, Fox News published a report on November 25, 2014 entitled “Amid Hacking Attack, State Department Info-Security Still in Shambles. The timely report stated that the U.S. government “identified control deficiencies across a total of 102 different systems”. In other words, the entire U.S. government has been hacked, most likely be China. The report also stated that the info-tech weaknesses amount to a “significant deficiency” in its security, defined as a weakness that “significantly restricts the capability of the agency to carry out its mission or compromises the security of its information, information systems, personnel, or other resources, operations, or assets”. A day later on November 26, 2014, Fox New published a report entitled “US Lacks Strategy to Counter Unconventional Warfare Threats from States and Terrorists. The timely report by the Army Special Operations Command stated that China is waging unconventional warfare around the world, and the U.S. currently lacks a clear strategy to counter the threat. In other words, the U.S. is vulnerable to an unconventional Chinese attack, something a drone attack would qualify under. The report went on to state that “This challenge is hybrid warfare combining conventional, irregular, and asymmetric means, to include the persistent manipulation of political and ideological conflict”.
1.3: Regin Malware
The Chinese malware needed for a successful cyber-attack on the United States was recently identified by CNN in their November 23, 2014, report entitled “‘Regin’ Malware Described as ‘Groundbreaking and Almost Peerless’”. According to the timely report, “Reign” is malware that has been lurking in computers for as long as six years, according to Symantec (SYMC, Tech30), the cybersecurity firm that produces Norton Antivirus. “Its capabilities and the level of resources behind Regin indicate that it is one of the main cyberespionage tools used by a nation state,” Symantec explained and that “development took months, if not years, to complete.” Researchers stated little to answer several key questions such as: Who designed it? How widely has it spread? What has it scooped up? What are the risks? In other words, the entire internet infrastructure of the United States has been hijacked by the Regin malware and therefore any type of cyber-related attack or hijack of on America’s military is possible. In reality, the internet was built specifically so that a third party can access it and crash certain entities when politically expedient.
II: CYBER-HIJACK DRONE ATTACK:
2.1 Chinese Cyber-Hijack Possible
Back on November 19, 2013, U.S. Navy Captain Mark Hagerott warned that sonic computer viruses launched by hackers could “jump the air gap” and target military systems that are not connected to the internet. In other words, Chinese computer viruses are able to attack U.S. military defense systems, even those not connected to the internet. The report was evidently designed to make the notion of drone hacking seem more feasible prior to its fruition in reality. After all, if viruses are able to “jump the air gap”, infecting airborne drones isn’t such an outrageous mental leap.
2.2: Drone Hijack Propaganda
In order to bring unprecedented media attention to cyber-hijacking prior to the China hijacking U.S. drones to launch attacks, it was reported on March 16, 2014, that the missing Malaysian Flight MH370 may have been the world’s first ever cyber hijack. Shortly thereafter, the television series entitled “24: Live Another Day” (2014) debuted on May 5, 2014. In short, the plot depicts Islamic terrorists who hijack U.S. military drones. Once under control of the terrorists, the drones are used to attack U.S. interests and allies. A “secret device” is used in the show to override U.S. cyber-security, suddenly turning friendly drones into enemy drones. Because the drones are built with the latest stealth technology, they are almost impossible to bring down. Consequently, the hijacked drones are used to attack football stadiums and hospitals in London, England, killing and terrorizing scores of people. Instead of the U.S. government gaining control over its own drones, a hacker is the one who finds the override code which can be used to control the drones.
2.3: System-Aware Secure Sentinel (SASS)
In what appears to be pre-Chinese drone cyber-hijack programming, it was reported on December 6, 2014, that a US shield will protect drones from ‘spoofing’ cyber-attacks. According to the report, Pentagon-sponsored engineers have developed a system to shield unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) from cyber-attacks. Called “System-Aware Secure Sentinel” (SASS), the new system detects “illogical behavior” compared to how the aircraft normally operates and sounds the alert if a drone starts doing something that it is not supposed to do. “Detections can serve to initiate automated recovery actions and alert operators of the attack,” said Barry Horowitz, a systems and information engineer at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, in a statement. Various threats were simulated by the researchers during five days of in-flight tests, including cyber-attacks launched from the ground, interference with supply chains and attacks from military insiders.
2.4: China’s Military Hacking Program
In order to create a believable narrative in the media prior to China’s cyber-hijack of U.S. drones, a number of fabricated incidents and staged events have taken place in order to set the stage for the attack. For example, on May 19, 2014, the U.S. officially accused China of hacking 6 companies, stating that China was after U.S. military secrets. This was the first time that a nation state was officially charged by the U.S. with cyber-espionage. In total, 5 Chinese “military hackers” were indicted in U.S. courts for cyber spying. Predictably, a day later on May 20, 2014, China suspended its cybersecurity cooperation with the U.S. over the aforementioned charges. That same day, Chinese officials confronted a U.S. envoy over the cyber-spying accusations in what appeared to be a CIA-spawned publicity stunt. Less than 24-hours later on May 21, 2014, China banned the use of Windows 8 on Chinese government computers, producing even more international headlines about the incident. Three days later on May 24, 2014, a report stated that the U.S. plans to “keep up the pressure” on China and that it is now in the process of selecting from a range of retaliatory options. Five days later on May 29, 2014, China openly suggested that the U.S. may have made up evidence for cyber-attacks, further confirming that the cyber-rift is indeed just political theater. Roughly 2 weeks later on June 10, 2014, it was revealed that the Chinese military has been hacking the U.S. aerospace industry for the last 7 years, a timely report designed to show that China likely has the ability to hack U.S. drones. Lastly, on June 10, 2014, it was revealed that a second Chinese military unit has been linked to hacking. According to reports, the Chinese hackers launched attacks against defense, satellite and aerospace firms within the U.S., Japan and Europe. Needless to say, the notion that China and her military are actively engaged in cyber-attacks against the U.S. military has been well established, making the notion of U.S. drones being cyber-hijacked by China seem all the more feasible.
2.5: Revenge Drone Attack
In order to provide a timely motive for a Chinese attack on America using U.S. drones, it was revealed on May 30, 2014, that the U.S. has deployed two advanced military drones to a Japanese airbase. Since China is currently in a dispute with Japan over the Senkaku Islands, the placement of the drones by the U.S. was a slap in the face designed to infuriate China just prior to a revenge attack using cyber-hijacked U.S. drones. Roughly a month later on June 26, 2014, U.S. military experts warned that killer drones will trigger a “slippery slope” into endless war, a propaganda report deigned to foreshadow the start of the cyber-war between the U.S. and China. As previously mentioned, once a drone war starts between the U.S. and China, cyber-hijackings followed by deadly drone attacks will become the norm. This drone war scenario essentially allows the CIA to attack whomever and whatever they want, whenever they want to. In the aftermath of the attack, the U.S. will blame China and China will blame the U.S. In essence, drones attacks will be used to eliminate anybody who doesn’t comply with system.
2.6: “Sting of the Drone”
The notion that the U.S. and China are on an irreversible collision course was recently highlighted during a CNN interview with Richard A. Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar under George W. Bush. Clark stated in respect to the escalation of cyber-espionage between the United States and China that, “I actually hope it does result in escalation and tit-for-tat, because we need this issue resolved…We can’t go on the way it’s been…This first step by the United States will undoubtedly result in an escalation of this issue. And we need to do that. We need to have this issue resolved one way or the other. If the Chinese are going to keep hacking into our companies, then we’re going to have to do something about it”. Interestingly, Clark made his comments while promoting “Sting of the Drone” (2014), his latest book about the impending drone war with China. The interview, which was documented in the May 21, 2014, CNN report entitled “Why U.S./China Cyber Escalation Could Be Good”, is yet another example of how wars are created by the CIA long before they manifest themselves in reality.
III. CHINESE NUCLEAR ATTACK:
3.1: Chinese Nuclear Attack
The notion of a Chinese nuclear attack on the U.S. was openly flaunted back on October 31, 2013, when the Chinese government released nuclear blast map projections for the U.S. cities of Seattle and Los Angeles after they were struck by Chinese nuclear warheads. A few weeks later on December 17, 2013, a Chinese space rover advert showed Europe being nuked, another ominous sign that a Chinese nuclear strike against the West is imminent. According to a report published on February 6, 2014, new Chinese-based submarine patrols have put Hawaii and Alaska within nuclear attack range, further foreshadowing a West Coast nuclear attack by China. Four days later on February 10, 2014, China reportedly showed off its new mobile ICBM on the internet, suggesting that China will soon be using her nuclear weapons in a mobile and offensive manner.
3.2: Chinese Cyber-Hijack Nuke Attack
The notion of a surprise cyber-attack by an Asian country was ominously foreshadowed in the Washington Times report from January 8, 2015, entitled “Preventing a ‘Cyber Pearl Harbor’”. The report stated “we have now reached a new era of cyberterrorism where threats cause just as much damage and fear as a bomb threat”, ultimately linking a cyber-related attack to a real world bomb, most likely nuclear in nature. A television-based cyber-hijack and nuke attack would be a redux of a previous Chinese attack plot depicted in the June 30, 2013, Truther.org report entitled “Live TV” Cyber-Hijack With “Live” Nuclear Detonation Now Trending”. The notion of a Chinese nuclear attack on the U.S. was openly flaunted back on October 31, 2013, when the Chinese government released nuclear blast map projections for the U.S. cities of Seattle and Los Angeles after they were struck by Chinese nuclear warheads. A few weeks later on December 17, 2013, a Chinese space rover advert showed Europe being nuked, another ominous sign that a Chinese nuclear strike against the West is imminent. According to a report published on February 6, 2014, new Chinese-based submarine patrols have put Hawaii and Alaska within nuclear attack range, further foreshadowing a West Coast nuclear attack by China. Four days later on February 10, 2014, China reportedly showed off its new mobile ICBM on the internet, suggesting that China will soon be using her nuclear weapons in a mobile and offensive manner.
IV. CHINESE EMP ATTACK:
4.1: China’s EMP Quest
In a January 8, 2011, report entitled “China’s Quest For Dominance In Electro-Magnetic Warfare”, it was revealed that “China’s continued advancement in their air defense sector has continued to raise more concerns” and that “the Dong Feng 21D, a land-based anti-ship ballistic missile that officials now say has reached its initial operating capability. Which analysts have said the new Chinese missile leaves U.S. aircraft carriers vulnerable to [an EMP] attack”. The article also quotes Vice Admiral Jack Dorsett, the deputy chief of naval operations for information dominance and the service’s intelligence director, as stating that China is trying to dominate “in the electro-magnetic spectrum, to conduct counterspace capabilities, and clearly to conduct cyber activities.” China has already been set-up as the EMP terror scapegoat much the same way that it has been set-up as the cyber-terror scapegoat. If the reports are to be believed, China is currently developing EMP weapons and could use them against U.S. aircraft carriers in a future conflict. If and when an EMP attack strikes America, there is a high probability that China will be ultimately scapegoated and attacked, so long as the American military is able to function post-EMP attack.
4.2: Chinese EMP Attack?
Back on November 10, 2010, it was reported that a satellite monitoring the western coast region of North America detected an “EMP anomalous event” when a Chinese sub allegedly fired an EMP weapon on November 8, 2010. According to the report, the Chinese Navy attacked the U.S. based cruise ship entitled the “Carnival Splendor” with an EMP missile, resulting in a “catastrophic crippling” that left 4,500 passengers stranded and its crew “dead in the water”. Later that day on November 8, 2010, a mysterious missile was caught on video flying off the coast of California near Los Angeles, California. Although the U.S. government denied that they were responsible for the missile, a Russian report later stated that the missile was in fact a BGM-109 (Tomahawk) subsonic cruise missile launched from a U.S. Navy Ohio-Class submarine operating off the coast of California. What exactly happened that day is not clear, but apparently the U.S. and/or the Chinese military attacked the “Carnival Splendor” with an EMP missile. Evidently, the U.S. Navy sent up a Tomahawk cruise missile as a decoy to distract people from this unprecedented EMP missile attack on an American cruise ship. Conversely, it is also possible that the mysterious missile caught flying off the coast of California was in fact the U.S. EMP missile responsible for the “catastrophic crippling” of the Carnival Splendor.
About the Author
David Chase Taylor is an American journalist and the editor-in-chief of Truther.org, a state-sponsored whistle-blower website. Taylor lives in Zurich, Switzerland where he is currently in the process of applying for political asylum since the release of The Nuclear Bible, a book credited with foiling a nuclear terror attack upon Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas on February 6, 2011. Taylor recently authored Greenland Theory: Apocalypse Now, a book and website exposing the true power structure of the world, especially in respect to Greenland and its primary proxy state of Switzerland which is home to the CIA. Taylor has also published The Bio-Terror Bible, a book and website exposing the global bio-terror pandemic planned for 2015. To date, Taylor has blown the whistle on over 100 state-sponsored terror plots, including the 2012 Democratic National Convention Terror Plot, the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the Terrorgate Scandal, the 2014 Memorial Day Massacre, the man-made asteroid attack planned for 2014, and the drone strike which killed “Fast and Furious” star Paul Walker. Taylor was also the first to expose Alex Jones’ treacherous links to STRATFOR and is noted for the 10 reasons why the Rosetta Comet landing was a hoax.
Truther.org Legal Disclaimer
Truther.org’s stated purpose is to stop terrorism by drawing unwanted global attention to terror plots prior to their fruition. Terror alerts and warnings made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility that they may occur based on breaking terror-related news, events and data. Historically speaking, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed, it is immediately canceled, postponed, or reworked (e.g., the 2011 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Super Bowl Nuclear Terror Plot, the 2014 Freedom Tower Nuclear Terror Plot, etc.). State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats, create plausible deniability, and mislead the public from the usual suspects of terror which work at the behest of the CIA in Switzerland. Please support real citizen journalism and help make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste